TRADE MARKS – infringement of registered trade mark established – where registered trade mark is a name – joint tortfeasance – principles discussed
TRADE MARKS – specification of registered goods – meaning of “clothes” – role of the Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks as an aid to construction
TRADE MARKS – defence to infringement – where infringing mark is a name mark – own name defence – whether joint tortfeasor who does not use the infringing mark can rely on the defence – whether defence applies to the use of an adopted name – where person relying on defence has assigned the name mark – whether assignor can rely on continuing use of own name as a defence
TRADE MARKS – defence to infringement – where infringing mark is deceptively similar to the registered mark – whether person using the infringing mark would obtain registration – honest concurrent use – whether concurrent use established – whether honest use established
TRADE MARKS – cancellation – whether, because of reputation in prior mark, use of the registered mark would be likely to deceive or cause confusion – where ground of cancellation established – whether discretion should be exercised not to cancel the registration of the registered mark
TRADE MARKS – cancellation – whether, because of circumstances applying at the time when the application for rectification is filed, the use of the registered mark is likely to deceive or cause confusion – where ground of cancellation is established – whether discretion should be exercised not to cancel the registration of the registered mark
Related Federal Court cases on trade marks
-
Paco Nominees PL v Ella Secret Australia PL (Default Judgment) [2025] FCA 366
TRADE MARKS – default judgment – respondents’ failure to comply with orders and appear – claim of trade mark infringement – default judgment granted PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for default judgment pursuant to r 5.23 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – whether appropriate to grant injunction – whether satisfied that an order…
-
Somers Enterprises Australia PL v Basefun PL [2025] FCA 218
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – trade marks – registration – application for removal for non-use – appeal de novo – extent of use in relevant class within Australia – discretion of Court to allow mark to remain on Register of Trade Marks – appeal allowed – Trade Mark retained on Register Related cases about trademark revocation Original…
-
Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd v Lavazza Australia Pty Ltd [2025] FCAFC 12
TRADE MARKS – validity – ownership – where primary judge found appellant (Cantarella) was not the owner of the ORO trade mark and ordered that registrations be cancelled pursuant to ss 88(1)(a) and 58 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) (“the Act”) – where primary judge found prior use of trade marks by third…
Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/full/2024/2024fcafc0149
For more information, see the original judgement.
