Dundas Lawyers® advises digital marketers on all aspects of compliance with the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) and Australian Consumer Law (ACL). Whether you are an advertiser, agency, technology business or media owner, the ACCC will regulate the content of digital advertising and disclosures through the ACL. Our team at Dundas Lawyers specialises in the knowledge and expertise to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements so that businesses can focus on what they do best.
Why choose Dundas Lawyers®?
Having exerted Blood Sweat and Years® since April 2010 we are the team you want on your side for the long term to act as the ‘bodyguard’ for your business in digital marketing. Some of the reasons clients choose Dundas Lawyers® include:
- our Uncommon business acumen;
- our Uncommon expertise in transactional, compliance and litigious matters;
- our Uncommon expertise forensic case preparation;
- our Uncommon customer focus;
- the fact that we don’t just know law, we know business!
- how we leverage our Uncommon Nous® to provide client centric solutions.
Considering getting a lawyer to advise your business?
For a confidential, no obligation initial telephone call to find out how we can help your business gain an uncommon advantage in digital marketing, please phone our team on either 1300 386 529 or 07 3221 0013.
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Legislation
Recent insights for digital marketers
-
What is the US Take It Down Act?
The Tools to Address Known Exploitation by Immobilizing Technological Deepfakes on Websites and Networks Act (Take It Down Act ) is a United States (US) federal law enacted on 19 May 2025. The Take It Down Act amends 47 U.S. Code § 223 (Code) of the Communications Act 1934 (US) (Communications Act) by establishing new…
-
The © (copyright) symbol in use
It is something that is often overlooked, however it is considered best practice to add a copyright statement and the little © symbol (Copyright Statement) on any literary or artistic works (Works) that a business publishes and asserts that it owns. Under Australian law, the “material form” of all original Works is automatically protected by…
-
Australian Court: AI can’t be “inventor” in Australian patent
The Federal Court of Australia has made a groundbreaking ruling on the patentability of works created by Artificial Intelligence. Explore the implications of this decision and what it could mean for the future of patent law.
-
Can social media chat logs be documents in Federal Court?
The Federal Court has addressed the hearsay rule exception of using a log from an instant messaging platform to prove the identity of the sender, date, time of the message, and contents of the statement.
-
Legal risks in the in-app purchase model
Software developers and publishers are offering users the chance to make In-App Purchases within their software, but there are legal risks involved. Learn how to protect yourself and your business by understanding the requirements of distribution platforms and Australian consumer law.
-
Understanding the legal issues of gamification
Gamification is a popular way to engage customers, but there are many legal issues to consider. This article looks at those issues and offers advice on how to get started.
Recent Federal Court decisions regarding digital marketers
-
Google LLC v Defteros [2022] HCA 27 (17 August 2022)
-
Commissioner for Consumer Affairs (SA) v Star Plus Group Pty Ltd (in liq) [2023] FCA 778
CONSUMER LAW – Application by regulator for declaratory and injunctive relief together with the imposition of pecuniary penalties for conduct by the respondents – where respondents posted fake consumer testimonials and reviews of their business to comparator websites – where respondents provided false tax invoices to a comparator website in order to post false testimonials…
-
Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v Telstra Limited [2024] FCA 246
COPYRIGHT – whether site blocking orders should be made under s 115A of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) Held: site blocking and related orders made
