Corporate law Brisbane

Is your ACN on all your public documents?

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

In Australia every company is issued with a unique, nine-digit number known as an Australian Company Number (ACN).  The ACN must appear on all public documents.  The purpose of the ACN is to ensure that companies are identified when conducting business transactions.1  On registration, new companies are issued with an ACN by the Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC).2

Section 153 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act) provides that a company must set out its name and ACN on all its public documents and negotiable instruments.

What is a public document?

Section 88A of the Act defines a public document as:

(a)       an instrument which is required by the Act, the Australian Securities & Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth), or any other Australian Law; or

(b)       an  instrument for the purposes of a particular transaction or dealing; or

(c)       a business letter, statement of account, invoice, receipt, order for goods, order for services or official notice of, or purporting to be signed or issued by or on behalf of, the body.

ASIC Regulatory Guide 13 provides that the items on which the ACN should appear include:

(a)     all documents required to be lodged with ASIC;

(b)       contracts and dealings where the company intends to be contractually bound;

(c)       business letterheads;

(d)       official company notices;

(e)       statements of account, including invoices;

(f)        orders for goods and services;

(g)       cheques, promissory notes and bills of exchange; and

(h)      receipts (which are not machine-produced);

(i)        written advertisements which make a specific offer that is capable of being accepted (such as an order form).

The following additional guidelines are provided by ASIC:

(a)       the ACN following the company’s name must be shown on the first page, if a company’s name appears on a document with two (2) or more pages;

(b)       the ACN should be clear, easy to read, and obvious as to the company to which it relates; and

(c)       the ACN should be identified by the words ‘Australian Company Number’, or by the abbreviations ‘ACN’ or ‘A.C.N.’ which is permitted by section 149 of the Act.

When is the ACN not required?

Section 88A(2) of the Act provides that a thing is not a public document of a body if it:

(a)       is applied, or to be applied:

(i)        to goods; or

(ii)        to a package, label, reel or thing in or with which goods are, or are to be, supplied; and

(b)       is so applied, or is intended or required to be so applied, for a purpose connected with the supply of the goods.

As described in Regulatory Guide 13, the items on which the ACN is not required include:

(a)       packaging and labelling, including envelopes and transport documents;

(b)       advertisements which do not make a specific offer which is capable of being accepted (such as advertisements which only promote the company and its goods or services in general);

(c)       machine-generated receipts;

(d)       business cards and ‘with compliments’ slips;

(e)       credit cards and credit card vouchers; and

(f)        items which are not documents.

What are the penalties for non-compliance?

The penalty for non-compliance is ten (10) penalty units ($1,100) or three months imprisonment, or both, pursuant to Schedule 3 Item 17 of the Act.[3]

Further information


Related insights about corporate law

  • Director’s misuse of funds held to be oppressive

    Director’s misuse of funds held to be oppressive

    This article explores shareholder oppression, examining Section 232 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and Martin v Australian Squash Club Pty Ltd (1996) 14 ACLC 452, to understand the cumulative effect of individual acts.

    Read more …

  • What are sophisticated investors?

    What are sophisticated investors?

    This article provides an overview of the requirements for a person to be a sophisticated investor under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and the Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth). It covers the definition of ‘person’, the Assets Test and Income Test, Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) guidance, and the complexities of self-managed super funds.

    Read more …

  • e-Signatures – legally binding on companies?

    e-Signatures – legally binding on companies?

    E-signatures are becoming increasingly popular, but are they legally binding? Find out in this article, which examines the Adelaide Bank case and reveals the limitations of e-signatures when it comes to executing a deed. Click through to learn more.

    Read more …

  • Company funds must be used for company purposes

    Company funds must be used for company purposes

    This article examines the legal principles behind when it is permissible to use company funds, focusing on the case of Re D G Brims and Sons Pty Ltd (1995) 16 ASCR 559, which established that company funds must only be used for company purposes and not to pay for legal costs of proceedings for the…

    Read more …

  • The running account defence to unfair preference claims

    The running account defence to unfair preference claims

    Creditors who have been paid by a customer on credit may find themselves facing an Unfair Preference claim letter from a liquidator. Learn more about the defences available to creditors and how to protect yourself from repaying more than your fair share.

    Read more …

  • Unfair preferences & the set-off defence

    Unfair preferences & the set-off defence

    Under section 588FA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act) an unfair preference is defined as a transaction, such as payment of an outstanding debt, between a company and an unsecured creditor which results in that unsecured creditor receiving more than it would have received if it had to prove in the winding up of the…

    Read more …

  • Unfair preferences – the Doctrine of Ultimate Effect

    Unfair preferences – the Doctrine of Ultimate Effect

    Explore the Doctrine of Ultimate Effect, running account defence and more in this article by Dundas Lawyers. Learn how these concepts can provide a defence to an unfair preference claim under Section 588FA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

    Read more …

  • Bullying in the workplace by a body corporate

    Bullying in the workplace by a body corporate

    This investigation reveals the legal implications of workplace bullying in a body corporate. Find out what the Obligations of Reasonableness and the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) mean for workers and how to apply for an order to stop the bullying.

    Read more …

  • Director’s duties – the case of MG Corrosion Consultants PL v Gilmour

    Director’s duties – the case of MG Corrosion Consultants PL v Gilmour

    The case of MG Corrosion Consultants Pty Ltd v Gilmour [2014] FCA 990 serves as a reminder of the need for Directors to uphold their obligations under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Uncover the Courts findings and the implications for Directors.

    Read more …


Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend