Corporate law Brisbane

Overview of loan agreements

HomePrivate: BlogLegal insightsOverview of loan agreements

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

A loan agreement (Loan Agreement) is a formal document under which one party (Lender) advances funds to another (Borrower), subject to the Borrower’s obligation to repay that money.  In any situation involving a loan, even between friendly or related parties, it is considered best to enter into a formal Loan Agreement to protect both the Lender’s and Borrower’s interests.

Loan Agreements range from the relatively straightforward to the exceedingly complex.

Common clauses in Loan Agreements

Most Loan Agreements will include clauses that:

  • secure the funds advanced against the assets of the Borrower, usually by the granting of a security interest in favour of the Lender (PPSA Clauses);
  • outline events which lead to the Early Repayment Amount becoming immediately due and payable (Events of Default);
  • provide for a set Repayment Date on which the Borrower must make all payments owing to the Lender, in a manner prescribed by the Lender (Repayment of Secured Moneys); and
  • set out representations, warranties and covenants made by the Borrower to the Lender (Representations, Warranties and Covenants).

As the arrangement between the parties increases in complexity, it is not uncommon for the Loan Agreement to also include clauses that:

  • enable the advancing of further funds to the Borrower, on the same terms as the initial advance (Loan Facility); and
  • provide a variable interest rate, that is triggered in the event that the Borrower defaults on their obligations (Payment of Interest).

Of course there are many other variations depending on the rights held by the Lender, the relationship between the Lender and Borrower, and the intention of both parties.

Common “pitfalls”

For parties entering into Loan Agreements there is much to consider.  The risks include, but are certainly not limited to:

  • the Lender requiring a director, shareholder or beneficiary to provide a guarantee for the Borrower;
  • the relationship between the Lender and Borrower giving rise to a presumption that the loan is in fact a gift;
  • ambiguity in the Repayment of Secured Moneys clauses leading to a claim under the Loan Agreement becoming statute barred; and
  • the Lender failing to register any security interest granted under the Loan Agreement on the Personal Property Securities Register within the required times.

Each situation will depend on the negotiating power of each respective party and the rights and obligations that they are able to negotiate.

Recent cases

Loan agreements between family members

Liakos v Zervos & Anor [2011] FamCA 547

  • A father loaned his son $587,000 over a number of years.
  • No formal Loan Agreement was written up until the son and his wife separated.
  • The Court found the Loan Agreement to be unenforceable as the terms had never been enforced by the father. As such, the transaction constituted a gift, and the funds were able to be taken into consideration in the son’s divorce proceedings.

Loan agreements and oral agreements

Equuscorp Pty Ltd v Glengallan Investments Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 55

  • The Borrower argued that prior to entering into the written Loan Agreement, it had entered into an oral agreement with the Lender, the terms of which were inconsistent with the written Agreement.
  • The Court held that the Borrower was bound by the written Agreement, and as such had defaulted on the repayments.

Further information about drafting or negotiating the terms of a Loan Agreement

If you need assistance drafting or negotiating the terms of a Loan Agreement, please contact us for a confidential and obligation free discussion:


Related insights about drafting or negotiating the terms of a Loan Agreement

  • Director’s misuse of funds held to be oppressive

    Director’s misuse of funds held to be oppressive

    This article explores shareholder oppression, examining Section 232 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and Martin v Australian Squash Club Pty Ltd (1996) 14 ACLC 452, to understand the cumulative effect of individual acts.

    Read more …

  • What are sophisticated investors?

    What are sophisticated investors?

    This article provides an overview of the requirements for a person to be a sophisticated investor under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and the Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth). It covers the definition of ‘person’, the Assets Test and Income Test, Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) guidance, and the complexities of self-managed super funds.

    Read more …

  • e-Signatures – legally binding on companies?

    e-Signatures – legally binding on companies?

    E-signatures are becoming increasingly popular, but are they legally binding? Find out in this article, which examines the Adelaide Bank case and reveals the limitations of e-signatures when it comes to executing a deed. Click through to learn more.

    Read more …

  • Company funds must be used for company purposes

    Company funds must be used for company purposes

    This article examines the legal principles behind when it is permissible to use company funds, focusing on the case of Re D G Brims and Sons Pty Ltd (1995) 16 ASCR 559, which established that company funds must only be used for company purposes and not to pay for legal costs of proceedings for the…

    Read more …

  • The running account defence to unfair preference claims

    The running account defence to unfair preference claims

    Creditors who have been paid by a customer on credit may find themselves facing an Unfair Preference claim letter from a liquidator. Learn more about the defences available to creditors and how to protect yourself from repaying more than your fair share.

    Read more …

  • Unfair preferences & the set-off defence

    Unfair preferences & the set-off defence

    Under section 588FA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act) an unfair preference is defined as a transaction, such as payment of an outstanding debt, between a company and an unsecured creditor which results in that unsecured creditor receiving more than it would have received if it had to prove in the winding up of the…

    Read more …

  • Unfair preferences – the Doctrine of Ultimate Effect

    Unfair preferences – the Doctrine of Ultimate Effect

    Explore the Doctrine of Ultimate Effect, running account defence and more in this article by Dundas Lawyers. Learn how these concepts can provide a defence to an unfair preference claim under Section 588FA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

    Read more …

  • Bullying in the workplace by a body corporate

    Bullying in the workplace by a body corporate

    This investigation reveals the legal implications of workplace bullying in a body corporate. Find out what the Obligations of Reasonableness and the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) mean for workers and how to apply for an order to stop the bullying.

    Read more …

  • Director’s duties – the case of MG Corrosion Consultants PL v Gilmour

    Director’s duties – the case of MG Corrosion Consultants PL v Gilmour

    The case of MG Corrosion Consultants Pty Ltd v Gilmour [2014] FCA 990 serves as a reminder of the need for Directors to uphold their obligations under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Uncover the Courts findings and the implications for Directors.

    Read more …


Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend