Corporate law Brisbane

Prohibition on the acquisition of relevant interests

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawCorporate lawProhibition on the acquisition of relevant interests

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

2–3 minutes

Section 606 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corps Act) contains a prima facie prohibition against the acquisition of relevant interests in voting shares.

What is a relevant interest?

Relevant interest in relation to securities is defined in section 9 of the Corps Act as taking its meaning from section 608 and section 609.

Section 608 provides that a person has a relevant interest if they:

  • are the holder of the securities;
  • have the power to exercise or to control a right attached to securities; or
  • have the power to dispose of the securities;

Subsections 2 and 3 of section 608 further provide for what is broadly described as “grouping provisions” meaning that for the purposes of determining whether or not a person has a relevant interest, interests controlled through trusts and bodies corporate are included. The remainder of section 608 contains other requirements which, if satisfied will mean that a person has a relevant interest.

What is the threshold that applies?

The prohibition against the acquisition of a relevant interest contained in section 606 applies to:

  • listed companies;
  • an unlisted public company with more than 50 members;

Therefore, by exception it does not apply to unlisted public companies which have less than 50 members or proprietary limited companies.

Where the person acquires the interest through a transaction in relation to securities and because of the transaction a person’s voting power in the company increases:

  • from 20% or below to more than 20%; or
  • for a starting point that is above 20% and below 90%.

Note 3 to section 606 of the Corps Act provides that:

If the acquisition of relevant interests in an unlisted company with 50 or fewer members leads to the acquisition of a relevant interest in another company that is an unlisted company with more than 50 members, or a listed company, the acquisition is caught by this section because of its effect on that other company”.

There is also an implicit part of section 606 which prohibits the entering into a transaction which creates a relevant interest on behalf of a third party.

Exceptions

Section 611 of the Corps Act contains the exceptions to the acquisition of a relevant interest.

There are twenty (20) exceptions, notably subsection 9, known as the “creeping provisions” which allow a 3% creep in 6 months and section 7 which provides for approval by resolution of the general members of the company, subject to certain conditions. Refer to section 611 of the Corps Act for a complete list of exceptions.

Links and further references

Legislation

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s606

Cases

Australian Pipeline Limited v Alinta Limited [2007] FCAFC 55 – application for a declaration of contravention of s606

McMillan Properties Pty Ltd v W C Penfold Ltd and Anor [2001] NSWSC 1173 (11 December 2001) – a useful analysis of section 606 is conducted by Young CJ at 15

Viento Group Limited [2011] ATP 1 (13 January 2011)

Further information

If you need advice or further information about acquiring a relevant interest in voting shares, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights about corporate and contract law

  • ACCC consultation environmental and sustainability guidance

    ACCC consultation environmental and sustainability guidance

    The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission releases Draft Guidance to help businesses make environmental and sustainability claims without misleading consumers. Seeking input from stakeholders to ensure guidance is effective and up-to-date with consumer law.

    Read more …

  • Greenwashing on Facebook – ASIC fines Future Super

    Greenwashing on Facebook – ASIC fines Future Super

    Learn more about Greenwashing in Australia and the alleged incidents, with Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) responsible for regulating misconduct. ASIC issued an infringement notice to Future Super for making misleading Greenwashing claims on Facebook. Understand the legislative framework and how to avoid making false claims.

    Read more …

  • Consumer law updates business owners should know

    Consumer law updates business owners should know

    The Treasury Laws Amendment (More Competition, Better Prices) Act 2022 (Cth) (Act) amends various pieces of legislation to provide stronger competition and consumer protections.  In particular, the Act bolsters the penalties applicable for offences relating to unfair practices and unfair contract terms under as contained within the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA) and…

    Read more …

  • Resigning as director – when is it effective?

    Resigning as director – when is it effective?

    On 18 February 2021, the Treasury Laws Amendment (Combating Illegal Phoenixing) Act 2020 (Cth) (Treasury Act) came into effect and introduced various measures to combat “phoenixing”.  One of the reasons for this legislation was to help combat illegal phoenix activity which involves the creation of a new company to continue the business of an existing…

    Read more …

  • DIN update – deadline looms for Australian company directors

    DIN update – deadline looms for Australian company directors

    As 30 November 2022 approaches, Australian company directors must apply for a Director Identification Number (DIN) to comply with the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and the Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Act 2006 (Cth). Learn how to obtain your DIN, the application process and what documents you must provide.

    Read more …

  • Can contractors owe fiduciary duties to principals?

    Can contractors owe fiduciary duties to principals?

    This article examines whether independent contractors owe fiduciary duties to their principal, as well as any additional statutory duties that may be imposed on independent contractors who are company directors.

    Read more …

  • Disputed debts in body corporate matters

    Disputed debts in body corporate matters

    This article examines the potential consequences of missing contribution levy payments in community titles schemes. It looks at specific cases and the risks associated with disputed body corporate debts, including the High Court decision of David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1992] HCA 48.

    Read more …

  • Employee share scheme reforms from 1 October 2022

    Employee share scheme reforms from 1 October 2022

    Changes to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (CA) will reduce regulatory requirements and remove barriers for businesses to offer employee share schemes (ESS). This offers cash-poor businesses the potential to attract and retain employees who can benefit from ESS.

    Read more …

  • Director’s right to review company records

    Director’s right to review company records

    As a director, it is important to understand your obligations and rights, including the right to access the company books. Explore this further in this article, which examines the case of Oswal v Burrup Holdings Limited [2011] FCA 609 and the implications of a company refusing a director access.

    Read more …


Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend