Corporate law Brisbane

Prohibition on the acquisition of relevant interests

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawCorporate lawProhibition on the acquisition of relevant interests

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

2–3 minutes

Section 606 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corps Act) contains a prima facie prohibition against the acquisition of relevant interests in voting shares.

What is a relevant interest?

Relevant interest in relation to securities is defined in section 9 of the Corps Act as taking its meaning from section 608 and section 609.

Section 608 provides that a person has a relevant interest if they:

  • are the holder of the securities;
  • have the power to exercise or to control a right attached to securities; or
  • have the power to dispose of the securities;

Subsections 2 and 3 of section 608 further provide for what is broadly described as “grouping provisions” meaning that for the purposes of determining whether or not a person has a relevant interest, interests controlled through trusts and bodies corporate are included. The remainder of section 608 contains other requirements which, if satisfied will mean that a person has a relevant interest.

What is the threshold that applies?

The prohibition against the acquisition of a relevant interest contained in section 606 applies to:

  • listed companies;
  • an unlisted public company with more than 50 members;

Therefore, by exception it does not apply to unlisted public companies which have less than 50 members or proprietary limited companies.

Where the person acquires the interest through a transaction in relation to securities and because of the transaction a person’s voting power in the company increases:

  • from 20% or below to more than 20%; or
  • for a starting point that is above 20% and below 90%.

Note 3 to section 606 of the Corps Act provides that:

If the acquisition of relevant interests in an unlisted company with 50 or fewer members leads to the acquisition of a relevant interest in another company that is an unlisted company with more than 50 members, or a listed company, the acquisition is caught by this section because of its effect on that other company”.

There is also an implicit part of section 606 which prohibits the entering into a transaction which creates a relevant interest on behalf of a third party.

Exceptions

Section 611 of the Corps Act contains the exceptions to the acquisition of a relevant interest.

There are twenty (20) exceptions, notably subsection 9, known as the “creeping provisions” which allow a 3% creep in 6 months and section 7 which provides for approval by resolution of the general members of the company, subject to certain conditions. Refer to section 611 of the Corps Act for a complete list of exceptions.

Links and further references

Legislation

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s606

Cases

Australian Pipeline Limited v Alinta Limited [2007] FCAFC 55 – application for a declaration of contravention of s606

McMillan Properties Pty Ltd v W C Penfold Ltd and Anor [2001] NSWSC 1173 (11 December 2001) – a useful analysis of section 606 is conducted by Young CJ at 15

Viento Group Limited [2011] ATP 1 (13 January 2011)

Further information

If you need advice or further information about acquiring a relevant interest in voting shares, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights about corporate and contract law

  • Shareholders’ right to information

    Shareholders’ right to information

    When shareholders are restricted from accessing company information, it may be a sign of a dispute. The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) provides mechanisms for minority shareholders to obtain relevant information, but they must prove they are acting in ‘good faith’ and ‘for a proper purpose’.

    Read more …

  • Is your liquidated damages clause a penalty?

    Is your liquidated damages clause a penalty?

    This article explores the enforceability of liquidated damages clauses in contracts, examining tests, and precedent cases to determine when a clause is a “genuine pre-estimate of damages” and not a penalty.

    Read more …

  • Director loans – can they be recalled anytime?

    Director loans – can they be recalled anytime?

    This article explores the legal considerations of when loans between family members or directors of a company are due and payable on demand. Learn more about the relevant case law and express terms that may be implied by conduct.

    Read more …

  • What exactly is a partly-paid share?

    What exactly is a partly-paid share?

    Investing in partly-paid shares can come with unique benefits, such as voting rights and profits. Learn more about the legal and financial implications of this type of investment and the payment process involved.

    Read more …

  • Can a third party be held accountable for breaching director duties?

    Can a third party be held accountable for breaching director duties?

    This article examines how the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) holds third parties “knowingly involved” in director misconduct accountable. Learn more about the tests, cases, and damages that can result from company business gone wrong.

    Read more …

  • Preventing ex-employees from using your client list

    Preventing ex-employees from using your client list

    This article examines a Federal Court of Australia decision to grant an interlocutory injunction against a former employee. Learn how the Court reached its decision, what businesses can take away from the case, and find out how to protect your business from similar breaches.

    Read more …

  • Holding company responsibility for subsidiary debts

    Holding company responsibility for subsidiary debts

    Uncover the factors that affect a holding company’s liability for its subsidiary’s debts. Learn when a holding company can be liable and what defences are available to protect it.

    Read more …

  • ASIC v Macdonald – have the lessons really been forgotten?

    ASIC v Macdonald – have the lessons really been forgotten?

    The case of Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Macdonald (No 11) [2009] NSWSC 287 highlights the importance of properly documenting Directors’ meetings to ensure they are legally compliant. This article examines the facts of the case, the basis of The Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s argument, and the principles of preparing minutes of Directors’…

    Read more …

  • The Crowd-sourced Funding Bill 2016 – overview

    The Crowd-sourced Funding Bill 2016 – overview

    Revised from the 2015 Bill, the 2016 Bill provides a regulatory framework for Crowd Sourced Funding (CSF) with eligibility requirements, obligations for Intermediaries facilitating the CSF Offers, and restrictions on advertising to protect retail investors.

    Read more …


Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend