copyright dispute lawyer

Proposed changes to use of orphan works

HomePrivate: BlogIP litigation and disputesCopyright infringementProposed changes to use of orphan works

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

3–4 minutes

On 13 August 2020, Paul Fletcher MP, Minister for Communications, Cyber Safety and the Arts, announced amendments to the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (Act).  The amendments follow two (2) years of stakeholder consultation, and finalise the Government’s response to the Productivity Commission’s 2016 Intellectual Property Arrangements Report.  The reforms focus on the use of “orphan works”, with an aim to provide a framework for copyright that is fit for the digital age.

What are orphan works?

Orphan works are works where the copyright owner cannot be identified, meaning it is difficult for a proposed user to seek permission to reproduce them.  An orphan work can be any type of work in which copyright subsists, such as photographs, paintings, written works and sound recordings (Orphan Work).

Works may be orphaned through a variety of circumstances, including where:

  • the work created was a long time ago;
  • required information was missing or deliberately removed, such as lack of metadata on images online; and
  • the owner has inadequate skills or tools to accurately claim rights in the works.

There is no specific provision in relation to the use of Orphan Works in the Act.  Unless covered by an exception or licence, the use of an orphan work may amount to an infringement of copyright.

Exceptions

There are some exceptions which allow individuals to use or reproduce orphan works.  These include the fair dealing exception and a statutory license.  The fair dealing exception only covers specific circumstances, including:

  • giving legal advice;
  • news reporting;
  • criticism;
  • research; and
  • parody.

Libraries and archives may also utilise orphan works for socially useful purposes under section 200AB of the Act.  The Copyright Amendment (Disability Access and Other Measures) Act 2017 (Cth) enhanced protection for libraries and archives to an extent by permitting them to create “preservation copies” of resource in their collections without infringing copyright.

A proposed limited liability scheme for use of orphan works

The proposed amendments include a limited liability scheme for use of Orphan Works.  This scheme will permit the use of copyright material where:

  • a reasonably diligent search has been performed, but the copyright owner cannot be identified or located; and
  • as far as reasonably possible, the work has been clearly attributed to the author.

The scope of diligent searches has not yet been confirmed, so it is strongly recommended for creative industries and other relevant sectors to assist in establishing guidelines around performing diligent searches.

If a copyright owner comes forward, users will be exempt from liability for use of the work for the period it was orphaned.  However, users will only be allowed to continue using the work on reasonable terms as agreed with the copyright owner or as fixed by the Copyright Tribunal.  If reasonable terms cannot be met, the copyright owner may seek an injunction against future use of their work.

Other proposed amendments

There are other proposed amendments of the limited liability scheme, including:

  • new specific fair dealing exception for quoting copyright material, subject to the quotation occurring for the purposes of non-commercial use;
  • the update of the library and archives exceptions, so that they are equally applied to all copyright materials and are technologically neutral;
  • the amendment of education exceptions, where current limitations and uncertainties around the use of copyright material in classroom teaching are removed; and
  • the streamline of government statutory licensing regime, which involves simplifying the method of determining fees payable to collecting societies and how these are paid.

Takeaways

The proposed reforms are forecast to benefit both the owner of an Orphan Work and the users of the works. It will allow orphan works to be utilised in creative industries, and will result in larger collections of works to be increasingly accessible by libraries, archives and educational institutions.

Links and further references

Legislation

Copyright Act 1968 (Cth)

Copyright Amendment (Disability Access and Other Measures) Act 2017 (Cth)

Report

2016 Intellectual Property Arrangements Report

Further information about orphan works

If you need advice on any protecting your copyright, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free and discussion:


Related insights about orphan works

  • Calculating account of profits – trade mark infringement

    Calculating account of profits – trade mark infringement

    This article examines the calculation of damages when an account of profits is awarded as a remedy for trade mark infringement. It covers the general principle, the proportionality rule, and the deduction of overhead costs.

    Read more …

  • Non-fungible tokens – a new way to hold IP?

    Non-fungible tokens – a new way to hold IP?

    Discover the rising phenomenon of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) and how they can help protect your Intellectual Property (IP). Learn how NFTs works, its benefits for rights holders, and potential legal issues. Get the full picture here.

    Read more …

  • Unjustified trade mark infringement threats

    Unjustified trade mark infringement threats

    Comprehensive list of Australian Court decisions and related legislation covering corporate, technology, intellectual property, commercial, employment, negligence, confidentiality, copyright, moral rights, user generated content, click wrap/browse wrap, trademarks, torts and social media law.

    Read more …

  • What exactly are moral rights?

    What exactly are moral rights?

    This article provides an overview of moral rights in Australia, including the three moral rights available to authors and performers, the works protected by them, their retrospective application, when they may be infringed, and the case of Meskenas v ACP Publishing Pty Ltd [2006] FMCA 1136 (Meskenas). Helping readers understand the implications of moral rights…

    Read more …

  • How much copying leads to copyright infringement?

    How much copying leads to copyright infringement?

    This article outlines the definition of Literary Works, the subsistence of copyright in such works, and the test for infringement of copyright under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). It also provides an overview of the four major characteristics to consider when determining if copying is substantial.

    Read more …

  • What is the proposed “patent box” tax incentive?

    What is the proposed “patent box” tax incentive?

    The Federal Government has announced a ‘patent box’ tax regime to boost Australian biotech and medtech innovators with a $206 million corporate tax cut. Learn more about the scope, qualifications and prerequisites for patenting an invention.

    Read more …

  • Accessory liability and copyright infringement

    Accessory liability and copyright infringement

    Manufacturers and service providers can be held liable for copyright infringement, but when? This article examines the legal implications of the Sea Shepherd (UK) v Fish & Fish Ltd [2015] UKSC 10 case and accessory liability.

    Read more …

  • Palmer breaches copyright – liable for $1.5m AUD in damages

    Palmer breaches copyright – liable for $1.5m AUD in damages

    Court found Respondent infringed copyright of Daniel “Dee” Snider’s works, awarding $1.5M for flagrant, contumelious infringements. It was found as not fair and not satirical/parodical.

    Read more …

  • Cost awards in unfair dismissal cases – part 1

    Cost awards in unfair dismissal cases – part 1

    Employers in Australia must be aware of potential costs involved when defending an unfair dismissal claim at the Fair Work Commission. Despite success, employers rarely get the option to recover costs from the complainant employee.

    Read more …

Send this to a friend