The Federal Government is proposing to introduce legislation that will target the publication of offensive or harassing material aimed at children on social media websites.
The anticipated legislation (once passed) will establish the Children’s e-Safety Commissioner (Commissioner) to administer the new legislation. It is currently proposed that the Commissioner will have the power to:
issue take down notices for offensive material to individuals and social media websites;
require a person make an apology; and
refer serious matters to the police.
The legislation is expected to include a two (2) stage monitoring process for the removal of offensive material published on social media:
firstly, a social media website will be provided with the opportunity to adhere to take-down notices issued by the Commissioner; and
secondly, failure to comply with orders of the Commissioner will result in the imposition of financial penalties.
It is proposed that fines of up to $A17,000 per day could be issued to social networking websites that repeatedly fail to adhere to take-down notices issued by the Commissioner.
The legislation plans to be a real incentive for social media giants like Facebook, Twitter and Instagram to review content and take active steps to remove offensive material that fuel online bullying.
We will provide further information on this legislation as it comes to light.
Links and further references
Australian Government, Department of Communication, “Enhancing Online Safety for Children”, January 2014
Further information
If you need further information about social media law and how it may impact on your organisation, please contact us for an obligation free and confidential discussion.
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS. Legal Practice Director T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred) M: +61 419 726 535 E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Disclaimer
This article contains general commentary only. You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice. Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstance.
On 10 October 2025, the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC), led by Privacy Commissioner, Ms Carly Kind, released a twenty-nine (29) page Privacy Guidance on Part 4A (Social Media Minimum Age) of the Online Safety Act 2021 (New Guidance). This New Guidance details the privacy obligations for Age-Restricted Social Media Platforms (Restricted Platforms)…
On 8 October 2025, the Federal Court published the judgement of Justice Halley in the case of Australian Information Commissioner v Australian Clinical Labs Limited (No 2) [2025] FCA 1224 (AIC v ACL). Australian Clinical Labs Limited (ACL) was ordered to pay $5.8 million in civil penalties in relation to a 2022 data breach. This…
On 22 October 2025, Malcolm Burrows appeared live on Katherine Feeney’s ABC Radio program, “Legal Eagles” as the Technology and Intellectual Property Lawyer to discuss legal issues associated with artificial intelligence and the justice system.
On 10 September 2025, Malcolm Burrows appeared live on Katherine Feeney’s ABC Radio program, “Legal Eagles” as the Technology and Intellectual Property Lawyer to discuss legal issues associated with copyright subsisting in artificial intelligence (AI) training data.
On 31 August 2025, the Australian Government published the Final Report (Report) on the Age Assurance Technology Trial (Trial). Conducted by the independent Age Check Certification Scheme (ACCS), the Trial offers insights into the technical feasibility, privacy implications, and operational deployment capabilities of various age assurance technologies. While the Report explicitly states it is neutral…
On 9 September 2025, the eSafety Commissioner, Mrs Julie Inman Grant (Commissioner), registered six (6) new codes (New Codes) under the Online Safety Act 2021(Cth) (Online Safety Act) aimed at protecting children from the “clear and present” dangers of harmful AI chatbots and other online adult content. On 9 March 2026, these New Codes will…
Several authors commenced class action lawsuit against Claude AI (Anthropic) in the San Francisco District Court. The authors allege Anthropic infringed their copyright by using millions of pirated and purchased books to train its artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot, Claude AI. Anthropic has agreed to settle the class action approximately $1.5 billion US dollars, avoiding further…
On 31 July 2025, the Australian Government’s Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) published a 102-page AI Technical Standard (AI Standard) to promote responsible AI use by public sector entities and their staff (Entities). In a media release, DTA’s General Manager Lucy Poole explained that the AI Standard is “designed to integrate with what agencies already do”…
On 20 August 2025, Malcolm Burrows appeared live on Katherine Feeney’s ABC Radio program, “Legal Eagles” as the Technology and Intellectual Property Lawyer to discuss legal issues associated with the adoption of artificial intelligence and its’ intersection with copyright law.