The Federal Government is proposing to introduce legislation that will target the publication of offensive or harassing material aimed at children on social media websites.
The anticipated legislation (once passed) will establish the Children’s e-Safety Commissioner (Commissioner) to administer the new legislation. It is currently proposed that the Commissioner will have the power to:
- issue take down notices for offensive material to individuals and social media websites;
- require a person make an apology; and
- refer serious matters to the police.
The legislation is expected to include a two (2) stage monitoring process for the removal of offensive material published on social media:
- firstly, a social media website will be provided with the opportunity to adhere to take-down notices issued by the Commissioner; and
- secondly, failure to comply with orders of the Commissioner will result in the imposition of financial penalties.
It is proposed that fines of up to $A17,000 per day could be issued to social networking websites that repeatedly fail to adhere to take-down notices issued by the Commissioner.
The legislation plans to be a real incentive for social media giants like Facebook, Twitter and Instagram to review content and take active steps to remove offensive material that fuel online bullying.
We will provide further information on this legislation as it comes to light.
Links and further references
Australian Government, Department of Communication, “Enhancing Online Safety for Children”, January 2014
Further information
If you need further information about social media law and how it may impact on your organisation, please contact us for an obligation free and confidential discussion.
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Disclaimer
This article contains general commentary only. You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice. Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstance.
Related insights about social media law
-
Advertising guide for carriage service providers released
Carriage Service Providers must follow the Telecommunications Consumer Protections Code 2019 when advertising their offers to consumers. Learn the key elements to include, the advertising medium, and the use of disclaimers to avoid financial and reputational risks. Read this article to find out more.
-
Standard form telecom services agreements
Carriage service providers must comply with a range of legal requirements to protect their customers and their business. Learn what these are and how to ensure your company meets them in this informative article.
-
Revisiting software as a service agreement
Discover the legal considerations of commercialising a SaaS (Software-as-a-Service) Agreement as a business model. Uncover the key issues to consider when going to market with a SaaS offering, such as subscription terms, service levels, data handling, intellectual property (IP) in customizations, and more.
-
Managed service agreements for IT businesses
A Managed Services Agreement (MSA) outlines the roles and responsibilities of IT services provider and client, detailing services, payment, security, and more. It helps mitigate risks and ensure both parties are clear on expectations.
-
Top 11 legal tips for selling a technology business
These tips include asset sale or share sale, intellectual property ownership, legal and accounting due diligence, change of control issues, restraint of trade clauses, key personnel, and more.
-
s115A Copyright Act – infringement outside Australia
This article examines the concept of shareholder oppression and provides examples of when the Court has found oppressive conduct, as well as when it has not. It also outlines the remedies the Court prefers when faced with oppressive conduct.
-
Do meta tags amount to trade mark infringement?
Find out how the case of Accor Australia & New Zealand Hospitality Pty Ltd v Liv Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 554 highlights the potential risk of trademark infringements to businesses. Read more to discover the case background, takeaways, and tips to protect your business.
-
Electronic document execution by directors
The Federal Government has issued a ruling allowing companies to sign documents electronically until 6 November 2020. Find out more about how this ruling affects your business.
-
Assigning intellectual property and the right to sue
This case examines Re Taypar Pty Ltd v Benko Santic [1989] FCA 543, which determined that an assignee of intellectual property rights cannot sue for pre-assignment infringements, unless the assignment explicitly assigns a right to do so.
