Corporate law Brisbane

The legal requirements of crowdfunding in business

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawCorporate lawThe legal requirements of crowdfunding in business

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

3–4 minutes

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) defines equity-based crowd-sourced funding (CSF) as:

… a company raising funds—usually through an online intermediary—from a large number of individual investors who make relatively small financial contributions to the company… [and] a fundraising option for start-ups or small to medium-sized companies.[1]

Part 6D.3A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act) provides a regulatory framework for CSF (Regime).  Section 738G(1)(a)-(f) of the Act requires a company wishing to offer an issue of shares though CSF (CSF Offer) must:

  • issue shares that are of the specified class;
  • be an eligible company (Eligible CSF Company);
  • not offer more than the issuer cap (Issuer Cap); and
  • not reinvest in raised funds other entities or schemes.

This article discusses these requirements.

Shares issued of the specified class

Section 761E(1)-(2) of the Act defines an issue as the first time a share is made available to a person by the issuer.[2]  This makes transfers within a company or the sale of already issued shares ineligible under the Regime.[3]

Regulation 6D.3A.01(1) of the Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth) (Regulations) provides that fully paid ordinary shares are the only securities class permitted in a CSF Offer under the Regime.  This means that a company cannot offer an issue of partly paid or preference shares nor options or debentures.[4]

Eligible CSF Companies

Section 738H(1) of the Act provides Eligible CSF Companies are:

  • public companies and limited by shares; or
  • proprietary companies with at least two (2) directors.

The section also requires companies to:

  • be unlisted;
  • have its principal place of business located and the majority of director’s residing in Australia;
  • have a consolidated gross assets value of less than $25 million;[5]
  • have a consolidated annual revenue value that is less than $25 million;[6] and
  • have a primary purpose that is not investing in securities.

The Issuer Cap

Section 738G(2) of the Act provides that the sum of an Eligible CSF Company’s:

  • maximum amount sought to be raised;
  • total amounts raised one year after the CSF Offer; and
  • total amount raised in undisclosed offerings one year before the CSF Offer,

cannot exceed $5 million.

Takeaways

Only private companies limited by shares or proprietary companies with two (2) or more directors can raise funds by issuing equity through CSF.  These companies must be unlisted and primarily conduct business within Australia to utilise CSF in the country.  The company must also have gross assets and revenue values of less than $25 million, respectively.  The shares must be issued meaning the first time they are sold on the market.  The issue must be of ordinary fully paid shares meaning transfers within the company are not allowed under the Regime.  Finally, the sum of the maximum sought to be raised, amounts raised one (1) year after the CSF Offer and total raised that is undisclosed one (1) year before the CSF offer, must be equal or less to $5 million.

Links and further references

Related materials

Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Regulatory Guide 261 Crowd-sourced funding: Guide for companies (June 2020)

Legislation

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)

Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth)

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth)

Further information about equity issuing and raising

If you need advice on equity issuing and raising for your company, or obligations and rights that may apply to you, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:

[1]  Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Regulatory Guide 261 Crowd-sourced funding: Guide for companies (June 2020), RG 261.1-4.

[2] See also Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 9, 761, 1023B; The Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) s 12BAA.

[3] See also Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 761E(7); Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Regulatory Guide 261 Crowd-sourced funding: Guide for companies (June 2020), RG 261.37.

[4] Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Regulatory Guide 261 Crowd-sourced funding: Guide for companies (June 2020), RG 261.37.

[5] See also Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 738H(a)(i).

[6] See also Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 738H(b)(i).


Related insights about equity issuing and raising

  • WIJOAV v Goldstone – shareholder oppression in a private equity context

    WIJOAV v Goldstone – shareholder oppression in a private equity context

    The recent case of WIJOAV Services Pty Ltd v Goldstone Private Equity Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 622 (WIJOAV v Goldstone) involved a claim of shareholder oppression under section 232 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act).  The case established that a shareholder in a private equity fund may be oppressed by a co-investor where…

    Read more …

  • Mere puffery vs misleading and deceptive conduct – where is the line?

    Mere puffery vs misleading and deceptive conduct – where is the line?

    In the case of Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54 (ACCC v TPG), the High Court of Australia (High Court) drew a distinction between mere puffery and representations with the intention of marketing.  This article explores the decision in ACCC v TPG and the distinction between puffery and…

    Read more …

  • Federal Court dismisses continuous disclosure claim

    Federal Court dismisses continuous disclosure claim

    The Federal Court recently dismissed Australia Securities and Investment Commission’s (ASIC) claim in Australian Securities and Investment Commission v Nuix Limited [2026] FCA 490 (ASIC v Nuix) that Nuix Limited breached its obligations under section 674 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act).  Nuix Limited (Nuix) successfully contested ASIC’s allegation that it had breached…

    Read more …

  • Individual Flexibility Arrangements: an overview

    Individual Flexibility Arrangements: an overview

    Modern awards and enterprise agreements set out the minimum terms and conditions of employment for most Australian workers performing different roles.  The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act) provides a mechanism by which an employer and an individual employee may, by agreement, adjust the operation of certain terms in their Award to better suit theircircumstances. …

    Read more …

  • Coercive control and shareholder oppression

    Coercive control and shareholder oppression

    The Criminal Law (Coercive Control and Affirmative Consent) and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2024 (Qld) came into effect on 18 March 2024, by adding chapter 29A to the Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld) (Criminal Code).  This chapter establishes a separate offence of “coercive control’, which stems from domestic violence offences and involves the use of…

    Read more …

  • Overview of the Unfair Trading Practices Bill 2026

    Overview of the Unfair Trading Practices Bill 2026

    On 1 April 2026, the Australian Government introduced the Competition and Consumer Amendment (Unfair Trading Practices) Bill 2026 (Cth) (Bill) to amend the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA) and Australian Consumer Law (ACL).[1]  If passed, the reform will take effect on 1 July 2027.  The Bill’s amendments aim to protect consumers from manipulative…

    Read more …

  • Does your start-up meet the ESIC tax-offset criteria?

    Does your start-up meet the ESIC tax-offset criteria?

    Federal government introduced the Tax Laws Amendment (Tax Incentives for Innovation) Act 2016 (Cth) to provide tax incentives for investors in an eligible early stage innovation company (ESIC), including 20% up-front non-refundable tax offset and capital gains tax (CGT) exemption for all types of investors meeting criteria.

    Read more …

  • White-Anting: An employer’s lawful termination guide

    White-Anting: An employer’s lawful termination guide

    Employees who use White Anting tactics to deliberately undermine management or disrupt workplace harmony may be summarily dismissed, provided the relevant legal conditions are met and a proper process is followed.  Following our 28 April 2026 article “White Anting: serious misconduct?“, this article provides practical “how to” steps for employers to lawfully dismiss employees who…

    Read more …

  • White Anting: serious misconduct?

    White Anting: serious misconduct?

    White Anting is an Australian term meaning to sabotage, undermine, or destroy an organisation, project, or person from within.  White Anting in the workplace often involves the quiet, insidious undermining of a colleague or superior through gossip, withholding information, exclusion, or spreading doubt.  White Anting  has been recognised by psychologists as a psychosocial hazard and…

    Read more …


Posted

in

, ,
Send this to a friend