In commercial contracts, a change of control clause is one that allows one of the parties to an agreement to terminate or modify its terms if a third party acquires a controlling stake in the other. A change of control clause grants a party certain rights, such a right to accelerate an obligation to pay or the right to terminate the contract for example. This is often sought due to a concern that a competitor may acquire a controlling stake in the company that a business is contracting with.
What transactions can trigger a change of control?
While there is no standard definition for a change of control clause, common events which can trigger a change of control clause include:
- the sale of all or a substantial amount of a contracting company’s assets;
- any “merger” of the contracting company with another company; or
- the transfer of a certain percentage of the contracting companies’ securities.
However, the class of commercial contract that can include change of control clauses is by no means closed. The case law cites joint venture agreements, executive employment agreements and what are change of control clauses to protect the interests of at least one of the parties.
Case law providing examples of a change of control clause
For example, in the case of Plzen Pty Ltd v P&O Wharf Management Pty Ltd [2007] VSC 318 the following was the change of control clause at issue:
“Clause 13.8 of the joint venture agreement stated:
(a) In the event of a Change of Control in respect of any party the following provisions shall apply:
(b) Change of Control for the purposes of this clause means any transfers or allotments of shares in the capital of any party (or that party’s holding companies) which have the effect of altering the identity of the person or group of persons who held directly or indirectly more than one half of the capital of that party (or that party’s holding companies) immediately prior to such transfer or allotment.
(c) The party affected by a Change of Control must immediately notify the other parties in writing of that fact and supply all relevant material particulars of the Change of Control to the other parties.
(d) Upon a Change of Control (whether or not notified under clause 13.8(c)) the party affected by the Change of Control will be deemed to have served a Transfer Notice under clause 13.2, with the Offer Price of Fair Market Value, and the provisions of clauses 13.2, 13.5 and 13.6 will apply with any necessary changes.”
The case of Kay v KRM (Vic) Pty Ltd; Classic Bet (NSW) Pty Ltd v Kay & Ors [2020] NSWCA 92 provides an example of a change of control clause as follows:
“Change of Control” was defined as follows:
“Change of Control occurs, in respect of an entity when:
(a) a person who did not have Control of the entity at the date of this Agreement acquires Control of the entity; or
(b) a person who did have Control of the entity at the date of this Agreement ceases to have Control of the entity but does not include a change due to an amalgamation or reconstruction of the shareholding of the entity as at the date of this Agreement involving an Associated Entity of the shareholder as at that date.”
“Control” was defined as having:
“the meaning given in the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).”
Section 50AA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) defines “Control” as:
“(1) For the purposes of this Act, an entity controls a second entity if the first entity has the capacity to determine the outcome of decisions about the second entity’s financial and operating policies.
(2) In determining whether the first entity has this capacity:
(a) the practical influence the first entity can exert (rather than the rights it can enforce) is the issue to be considered; and
(b) any practice or pattern of behaviour affecting the second entity’s financial or operating policies is to be taken into account (even if it involves a breach of an agreement or a breach of trust).
(3) The first entity does not control the second entity merely because the first entity and a third entity jointly have the capacity to determine the outcome of decisions about the second entity’s financial and operating policies.
(4) If the first entity:
(a) has the capacity to influence decisions about the second entity’s financial and operating policies; and
(b) is under a legal obligation to exercise that capacity for the benefit of someone other than the first entity’s members;
the first entity is taken not to control the second entity.”
In short there is no precise or prescribed form of a change of control clause.
Why include a change of control clause in a commercial contract?
Businesses may find including a change of control clause in a contract to be useful if they are wanting to ensure that the party that they contracted with does not change without their consent. It is particularly relevant where favourable commercial terms have been negotiated and any new owner may not want to continue on the same terms and conditions. A change of control clause can act to protect one or both party’s interests.
Links and further references
Legislation
Cases
Chameleon Mining NL v International Litigation Partners Pte Limited [2010] NSWSC 972; 79 ACSR 462
Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd (2014) 251 CLR 640
Fardell v Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 346
Goldus Pty Ltd v Australian Mining Pty Ltd [2015] SASCFC 193
Hancock v Rinehart [2015] NSWSC 646
Hutchison 3G Australia Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Limited [2009] VSC 203
Kay v KRM (Vic) Pty Ltd; Classic Bet (NSW) Pty Ltd v Kay & Ors [2020] NSWCA 92
Landream Melbourne Pty Ltd v Aust & NZ International Investment Group Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCA 318
Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 37
Multicon Engineering Pty Ltd v Federal Airports Corporation (1997) 47 NSWLR 631
Plzen Pty Ltd v P&O Wharf Management Pty Ltd [2007] VSC 318
Water Board v Moustakas (1988) 180 CLR 491
Further information about commercial contracts
If your business needs a change of control clause included in a commercial contract, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Disclaimer
This article contains general commentary only. You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice. Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstances.
Related insights about commercial contracts
-
Does your start-up meet the ESIC tax-offset criteria?
Federal government introduced the Tax Laws Amendment (Tax Incentives for Innovation) Act 2016 (Cth) to provide tax incentives for investors in an eligible early stage innovation company (ESIC), including 20% up-front non-refundable tax offset and capital gains tax (CGT) exemption for all types of investors meeting criteria.
-
Valuing ESS Interests
A company, whether listed or unlisted, can grant its employees an interest in its equity (ESS Interest), including through an employee share scheme (ESS) or employee share option plan (ESOP). There are restrictions contained in both the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) and Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) (ITAA) that determine the price…
-
ESS vs ESOP – what’s the difference?
Employee share schemes (ESS) and employee share option plans (ESOP) are commonly used by corporations to incentivise employees and align performance with company growth by providing them with an interest in the company. While the terms are often used interchangeably, they have distinct legal and structural differences under Australian law. This article explains the key…
-
Disputed ESOP – Selak v National Tiles Co Pty Ltd
In the case of Selak v National Tiles, the Vic Supreme Court considered whether a company breached an option agreement governed by the terms of an Employee Share Option Plan (ESOP) by requiring an option holder to execute an undisclosed shareholders’ agreement as a condition of exercising vested options.
-
Can a unit trust be wound up by the oppression remedies
The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corps Act) grants the Courts the power to award remedies under section 233, specifically designed to address situations of oppression within corporate entities under section 232. These remedies, also known as the “Oppression Remedies”, aim to resolve situations where a company’s conduct unfairly prejudices its members or shareholders. While primarily…
-
Directors’ obligations to comply with Accounting Standards
Directors are personally liable for ensuring their company operates in accordance with corporate governance and accounting standards. Obligations contained in part 2M.2 and 2M.3 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) outline obligations for companies to keep financial records and prepare annual financial and director’s reports. Sections 180 and 344 of the Corporations Act…
-
Accounting standards matter: the company’s obligation
Australian accounting standards (Accounting Standards) are often considered solely the domain of auditors and accountants. However, they are a crucial aspect of corporate law and governance in Australia. For directors, officers, and their professional advisers, the key issue is not the technical details of the Accounting Standards, but rather their legal enforceability. A failure to…
-
When a thumbs up emoji means accepting an offer
In a time where communication increasingly takes place through text messages and social media platforms, the legal recognition of non-traditional expressions, such as emojis, presents a potential evolution of the doctrine of acceptance in contract law. The 2023 Canadian decision by the Saskatchewan Court of King’s Bench (Court) in South West Terminal Ltd v Achter…
-
What is an indemnity clause?
The word indemnity, in its’ legal context, is defined as “legal protection against liabilities arising from one’s actions.” An indemnity clause therefore, represents the contractual embodiment of this definition, serving as a formal mechanism which protects one party from the from the actions or inactions of another. In effect, it enables parties to allocate risk…
