A software development agreement (Software Development Agreement) is a contract where one party (Developer) agrees to develop a software application for another party (Client). Concise drafting is key in Software Development Agreements to ensure that the resulting software meets the Client’s requirements and also does not allow for scope to the detriment of the Developer.
Common clauses in Software Development Agreements
The provisions in this sort of agreement will vary according to the size and scope of the software to be developed, but commonly include:
- acceptance testing – details any testing requirement the software must pass to be accepted by the Client;
- confidentiality – imposes obligations on the parties to keep all confidential information strictly confidential, except in listed circumstances;
- development stages – deadlines for the provision of software modules (also known as “deliverables”) by the Developer;
- escrow – requires the Developer to deliver the software to an escrow agent and outlines timeframes and responsibility for payment of such delivery;
- hosting – details which party is responsible for hosting the Software;
- indemnity – requires the Developer to compensate the Client for any loss or damage which results from a breach of the Contract;
- intellectual property ownership – states which party owns copyright in the software source code and any other materials provided to the Client;
- marketing – details whether the Developer is allowed to use the Software development as part of its marketing and advertising campaigns ;
- moral rights – the Client may request moral rights (that is, the right to attribution and the right to freedom from derogatory treatment) in the software are waived in the Client’s favour;
- restraint of trade – the Client may request that the Developer does not create competing software for the Client’s competitors for a specified period of time after expiration or termination of the Agreement; and
- warranty period – how long the Software should work without major errors or bugs.
Common problems with Software Development Agreements
A common issue is not adequately addressing ownership of intellectual property (IP) in the software itself. Under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) ownership of copyright in an original work generally rests with the original “author” of the work – in this instance the Developer. However, this can create issues for the Client who may wish to expand or modify the software in the future. Alternatively, assigning all copyright in the software to the Client can cause problems for the Developer, in that it prohibits them from using their common core libraries. To avoid these sorts of issues, it is best that they be documented in the Developer’s standard form contracts.
Links and further references
Cases
Intelmail Explorenet Pty Ltd v Vardanian (No 2) [2009] FCA 1018
Legislation
Further information about Software Developer Agreements
If you need assistance drafting a Software Development Agreement, please telephone me for an obligation free and confidential discussion.
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Disclaimer
This article contains general commentary only. You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice. Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstances.
Related insights about Software Developer Agreements
-
Misuse of confidential information within source code
In Australia, computer code can amount to confidential information as well as being subject to copyright protection. In some cases the two things overlap as was the case in decision of the Court in Optus Networks Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Ltd (2010) 265 ALR 281; [2010] FCAFC 21.
-
Updated USPTO guidelines on AI assisted inventions
In response to the Biden administration’s Executive Order on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence on 30 October 2023, which outlined policies and principles to promote responsible Artificial Intelligence innovation and competition, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued inventorship guidance for artificial intelligence (AI) assisted inventions. These…
-
Software developer obtains Court order – names behind IP addresses
Justice Burley of the Federal Court of Australia in the case of Siemens Industry Software Inc v Telstra Corporation Limited [2020] FCA 901 ordered that Telstra, within fourteen (14) days, provide to Siemens all documents in its control relating to the identity of certain Telstra Account holders. Those account holders were suspected by Siemens of…
-
The Digital ID Bill 2023 (Cth) – key points
On 30 November 2023, the Digital ID Bill 2023 (Cth) and the Digital ID (Transitional and Consequential Provisions) Bill 2023 (Digital ID Bills) were introduced in the Australian Senate. Digital IDs are designed to provide individuals with a convenient way to verify their identity when completing certain online transactions and dealing with government and certain…
-
What are adequate cybersecurity measures?
The adequacy of cyber security measures was considered in the case of Australian Securities and Investments Commission v RI Advice Group Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 496 (ASIC v Ri Advice Group). One of the issues raised was whether the respondent had adequate cyber security and cyber resilience in place across its network of financial advisors. …
-
National Classification Scheme – proposed federal changes
Albanese Government announces intention to reform National Classification Scheme, proposing R18+ for games simulating gambling and M for computer games with paid loot boxes/in-game purchases linked to chance. Learn more about proposed reforms and if simulated gambling needs to be addressed.
-
Digital Platform Services Inquiry – submissions sought
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission is investigating the activities of digital platform service providers and their impact on competition, consumerism, and business. Have your say and make a submission by 5 April 2023. Learn more in the seventh report of the Digital Platform Services Inquiry.
-
Australian legislation tackles loot boxes in video games
The Classification (Publications, Films and Computer Games) Amendment (Loot Boxes) Bill 2022 (Bill) has been tabled in the House of Representatives on the 28 November 2022. The private member’s Bill acts in response to growing support for the regulation of features and elements within video games which appear to simulate gambling.
-
Influencers now regulated when promoting therapeutic goods
The Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code 2021 (Cth) (2021 TGA Code) brings regulations for social media endorsements of therapeutic goods. Learn more about the changes and how to ensure compliance before they take effect on 1 January 2022.
