internet law

What does a network access agreement cover?

HomePrivate: BlogLegal insightsWhat does a network access agreement cover?

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Network access agreements are agreements between licenced carriers in which a carrier (First Carrier) gives another carrier (Second Carrier) access to its network, which the Second Carrier can then access to provide telecommunications services to end customers or other wholesale carriers.  Below we set out the key considerations, carriers need to cover in their network access agreements.

Routing

Carriers need freedom to re-route services as required.  It is important for the First Carrier to clearly state that the service does not include redundancy, particular wavelengths, particular equipment, assets or links or particular routing, unless specified in a service order, otherwise the First Carrier could be in breach of the agreement if it re-routes services between the points of interconnect or changes the equipment used to provide the service.   Likewise, carriers should not take on obligations to provide or utilise any specific configuration of assets, links or waveforms, network architecture, technology or related equipment, in providing the network services, unless agreed in a service order.

Faults and interruptions

Network access agreements should clearly provide that the First Carrier is not responsible for rectifying any fault in a service where the fault arises in or is caused by the Second Carrier’s network, equipment or facilities beyond the points of interconnect.

Acceptance testing

Where the network service is subject to acceptance testing, the criteria needs to be clearly set out in the order.  Where the Second Carrier does not give the First Carrier a certificate of acceptance or a notice of failure within a certain period of the service activation date, the agreement should state that the Second Carrier is deemed to have accepted the service.

Suspension

It is important that the First Carrier has the right to suspend its services to the Second Carrier if an upstream supplier terminates or suspends the underlying service.  There are two (2) broad approaches to addressing the risk of an upstream supplier cancelling the underlying service:

  • giving the First Carrier a broad suspension right; and
  • specifying more detailed scenarios where the First Carrier can suspend which more closely reflect upstream supplier’s rights to terminate or suspend.

Pass through charges

It is imperative that the First Carrier has the right to charge the Second Carrier additional amounts to cover events which cause the cost to provide the service increase, such as:

  • additional pass through charges directly imposed by an upstream supplier (including price increases, network extension costs, special and one-off charges);
  • to service, modify, repair or replace a service or any equipment, as a result of the Second Carrier’s breach of the agreement, failure of the Second Carrier’s equipment, or an act or omission of Second Carrier, Second Carrier’s personnel or an end user;
  • for installation or activation, if the information Second Carrier provides to determine the installation required is incomplete or inaccurate; and
  • for installation, maintenance and any other services that Second Carrier requests that the First Carrier provide outside normal business hours.

Network obligations – Second Carrier

The agreement should clearly state that the Second Carrier must ensure that its network and equipment is compatible with the First Carrier’s network and equipment, including all technical requirements set out in the Service Order, otherwise the service will not function properly.

 A prohibition on the Second Carrier Customer installing or connecting any equipment to the First Carrier’s network without first the First Carrier’s express written consent should be clearly stated, otherwise there is a risk that the equipment of the Second Carrier could interrupt, degrade or damage the First Carrier’s network and equipment which can cause service interruption to other carriers and end users.

Indemnity

It is important that the First Carrier is not faced with claims made by third parties against it arising from the acts or omissions of the Second Carrier.  To protect the First Carrier, the agreement should include an indemnity given by the Second Carrier against such claims.  The Second Carrier may request that the First Carrier give a reciprocal indemnity. 

 If the First Carrier considers this, the scope of such indemnity should be to the extent the liabilities of the Second Carrier has to third parties do not exceed the liability of the First Carrier to Second Carrier under the agreement For example, up to the designated cap with certain types of loss excluded, such as loss of profits.

Takeaways

Network access agreements require careful consideration to ensure carriers are not liable for any service interruption caused by upstream carriers or by its carrier customers.  A well-drafted network access agreement can avoid these scenarios and give the First Carrier freedom to re-route and suspend services as required and on-charge any pass-through costs.

Links and further references

Legislation

Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth)

Further information about network access agreements

If you need advice on network access agreements, please feel free to contact me for a confidential and obligation free discussion.


Related insights about technology law

  • AI businesses should have duty of care

    AI businesses should have duty of care

    In a recent interview with InnovationAus.com, Victorian Senator Michelle Ananda-Rajah (Senator) emphasised the need to adopt digital duty of care laws for artificial intelligence (AI) companies.[1]  As a representative of the ALP and former AI start-up founder, the Senator calls for the proposed digital duty of care to apply to AI companies.  If implemented, the…

    Read more …

  • Federal Court orders winding up of crypto mining investment scheme

    Federal Court orders winding up of crypto mining investment scheme

    The Federal Court of Australia delivered judgment in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v NGS Crypto Pty Ltd (No 5) [2025] FCA 1611, on 18 December 2025 ordering the winding up of two (2) cryptocurrency related entities after finding that they operated an unlicensed financial services business and an unregistered managed investment scheme in contravention…

    Read more …

  • Online Safety – is your online business a DIS or a RES?

    Online Safety – is your online business a DIS or a RES?

    Whether your online business has to comply with the obligations contained in the Online Safety Act 2021 (Cth) (OSA), and related standards and industry codes will largely depend on how your business is classified because of the functionality it provides to end users in Australia.

    Read more …

  • Bill to allow victims of AI deepfakes to sue for emotional damages

    Bill to allow victims of AI deepfakes to sue for emotional damages

    On 24 November 2025, Senator David Pocock introduced a private Senator’s bill, the Online Safety and Other Legislation Amendment (My Face, My Rights) Bill 2025 (Cth) (Bill) to amend the Online Safety Act 2021 (Cth) (Online Safety Act) and the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) (Privacy Act). 

    Read more …

  • Malcolm Burrows on ABC’s “Legal Eagles” segment – Deepfakes

    Malcolm Burrows on ABC’s “Legal Eagles” segment – Deepfakes

    On 3 December 2025, Malcolm Burrows appeared live on Katherine Feeney’s ABC Radio program, “Legal Eagles” as the Technology and Intellectual Property Lawyer to discuss the proposed amendments to the Online Safety Act 2021 (Cth) through the introduction of the Online Safety and other legislation Amendment (My Face Rights) Bill (Cth) 2025 (My Face Rights…

    Read more …

  • Federal Gov rules out copyright text and data mining exception for AI

    Federal Gov rules out copyright text and data mining exception for AI

    On 26 October 2025, the Attorney-General, Hon Michelle Rowland MP, published a media release reiterating that the current Federal Government will not introduce a text and data mining (TDM) exception to copyright infringement in the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (Copyright Act).  The Attorney-General’s Department will instead engage in further consultations with members of the Copyright…

    Read more …

  • Australian Government announces a digital duty of care

    Australian Government announces a digital duty of care

    The Australian Government has announced that it will soon be introducing legislation to create a digital duty of care under the Online Safety Act 2021 (Cth) (Act) in response to findings from an independent Statutory Review of the Online Safety Act 2021 (Review).  The Honourable Anika Wells MP announced that “big tech” companies will soon…

    Read more …

  • Dundas Lawyers achieves SMB1001 gold level cyber security certification

    Dundas Lawyers achieves SMB1001 gold level cyber security certification

    On 14 November 2025 Dundas Lawyers achieved the Gold level of the SMB1001 cybersecurity standard.

    Read more …

  • OAIC publishes new guidance for under-16s social media ban

    OAIC publishes new guidance for under-16s social media ban

    On 10 October 2025, the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC), led by Privacy Commissioner, Ms Carly Kind, released a twenty-nine (29) page Privacy Guidance on Part 4A (Social Media Minimum Age) of the Online Safety Act 2021 (New Guidance).  This New Guidance details the privacy obligations for Age-Restricted Social Media Platforms (Restricted Platforms)…

    Read more …


Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend