Is exporting a product a trade mark infringement?

HomePrivate: BlogIP litigation and disputesTrademark infringementIs exporting a product a trade mark infringement?

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

3–5 minutes

A trade mark is a sign used to distinguish goods or services from other similar goods or services, generally to associate that good or service with a brand.  Trade mark signs are a valuable form of intellectual property as they allow consumer to quickly and easily associate products with their favourite brands.  In Australia, the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) (Trade Marks Act) provides protection for the owners of registered trade marks.  In this article, we consider whether a person infringes a trade mark by manufacturing a good to sell overseas rather than in Australia – does the Trade Marks Act protect the Australian trade mark owner?

What rights do registered trade mark owners have?

Once registered, a trade mark provides the owner of the trade mark the exclusive right to use the trade mark in Australia, together with the right to authorise others to use the trade mark (section 20).  Therefore, following registration, the only people able to use the trade mark are the registered owner and those who have been authorised by the owner to use the trade mark.

The value of a trade mark lies in its ability to quickly allow consumers to easily associate a product with a brand that they like.  The value then lies in the allure of the brand, whether that be because of its perceived quality or popularity; if a consumer can easily associate the product with a brand they like, the product is likely to sell well.

What constitutes infringement of a registered trade mark?

A trade mark will be infringed when a person who is not the registered owner of the trade mark (and who has not been authorised to use the trade mark) uses a sign as a trade mark that is substantially similar with, or deceptively similar to, the registered trade mark (section 120).  A person who manufacturers a product and sells it to consumers in Australia will infringe a trade mark if their sign is substantially similar with, or deceptively similar to, the registered trade mark.  However, the question arises, can the Trade Marks Act stop a person from selling a product overseas that infringes an Australian registered trade mark?

Does exporting a product infringe a trade mark?

As the Trade Marks Act is Australian legislation, it does not have the power to enforce Australian trade marks overseas.  However, section 228 of the Trade Marks Act seeks to stop parties from manufacturing a product in Australia and attaching a trade mark that would infringe a registered Australian trade mark and exporting it overseas, outside of the reach of the Trade Marks Act.

Section 228 provides that if a person applies a trade mark to a product in Australia for the purposes of exporting. and it would be considered an infringement if the product was sold in Australia, that conduct (the application of the trade mark to the product) is itself an infringement.  For example, if a manufacturer in Australia produced a product to be exported to America which used the trade mark of a prominent Australian business, the attachment of the trade mark in Australia will still amount to an infringement, even though no products were to be sold in Australia.

What are the remedies for infringement of a trademark?

If a party is deemed to have infringed the registered trade mark of another, the aggrieved party may seek monetary compensation in the form of damages or an account of profits, but may also seek an injunction to stop further infringement (section 126).  A Court may award an additional amount of damages (above what would normally be awarded) in circumstances where the infringement of the trade mark warrants additional penalty, such as flagrant or knowing infringement (section 126(2)).

Takeaways

Trade marks are a valuable advertising and marketing tool which are protected by law in Australia.  It is important that manufacturers or distributors are aware of whether or not their merchandise infringes a registered trade mark.  Even if a manufacturer only produces a product for the purpose of exporting it (and not selling it in Australia), they will still be in breach of the Trade Marks Act, and may be liable for damages to the owner of the trade mark.

Further information about trade mark infringement

If you need assistance with trade marks, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights about trade mark infringement

  • What amounts to use of a trade mark outside of Australia?

    What amounts to use of a trade mark outside of Australia?

    The case of Lamont v Malishus & Ors (No 4) [2019] FCCA 3206 (Lamont v Malishus) involved an action for infringement of a registered trade mark in Australia under the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) (TMA).  This case raised several issues, including, whether using a word as part of a domain name constituted “use” as…

    Read more …

  • Clash of jurisdictions and trade mark infringement

    Clash of jurisdictions and trade mark infringement

    The case of International Hair Cosmetics Group Pty Ltd v International Hair Cosmetics Limited [2011] FCA 339 (Case) considered whether use of Australian registered trade marks on a British website constituted “use in Australia” under section 120 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) (TMA).  It was ultimately held that, despite use of the two…

    Read more …

  • Designer wins High Court case over Katy Perry trade mark dispute

    Designer wins High Court case over Katy Perry trade mark dispute

    On 11 March 2026, the High Court of Australia (High Court) delivered its judgment in the case of Taylor v Killer Queen, LLC [2026] HCA 5 (Taylor v Killer Queen), ending the seventeen (17) year trade mark dispute between pop star Katy Perry and Australian fashion designer Katie Jane Taylor. In a 3:2 majority decision,…

    Read more …

  • IP Australia follows Madrid Goods and Services list

    IP Australia follows Madrid Goods and Services list

    From 26 March 2024, IP Australia has implemented the internationally recognised Madrid Goods and Services list (Madrid List), replacing the AU Goods and Services Picklist.[1]  The adoption of the Madrid List comes as Intellectual Property Australia (IP Australia) seeks to align the Australian classification standards with the other intellectual property offices around the world.

    Read more …

  • Use of a competitors trade marks for comparative advertising

    Use of a competitors trade marks for comparative advertising

    Comparative advertising can be a powerful tool, but it must be done within the bounds of the law. Learn more about the legal implications of comparative advertising in Australia, including the case of GlaxoSmithKline Australia Pty Ltd v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Limited (No 2) [2018] FCA 1.

    Read more …

  • Trade mark infringement – the good faith defence

    Trade mark infringement – the good faith defence

    Navigating trade mark law can be difficult. This article explains the good faith defence and what circumstances must be fulfilled for it to be available, as well as relevant case law and further info.

    Read more …

  • Opposing a trade mark on grounds of bad faith

    Opposing a trade mark on grounds of bad faith

    Court found respondent infringed copyright of Dee Snider’s works, awarding AUD $1.5 million for flagrant, contumelious infringements. Not fair or satirical.

    Read more …

  • Case study – intellectual property protection structures

    Case study – intellectual property protection structures

    Protect your valuable intellectual property and secure revenue for product development. Learn how Dundas Lawyers can help you create an intellectual property protection structure with potential benefits for your business.

    Read more …

  • Calculating account of profits – trade mark infringement

    Calculating account of profits – trade mark infringement

    This article examines the calculation of damages when an account of profits is awarded as a remedy for trade mark infringement. It covers the general principle, the proportionality rule, and the deduction of overhead costs.

    Read more …

Send this to a friend