internet law

Dark fibre contracts for telecommunications providers

HomePrivate: BlogLegal insightsDark fibre contracts for telecommunications providers

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

4–5 minutes

Dark fibre refers to access to ‘unlit’ (unused) telecommunications fibre.  Generally, large telecommunications carriers and government utilities (Supplier) have dark fibre networks laid out that can be available to carriage service providers (CSPs) to access to scale up their network.  Below we set out key elements of dark fibre and corresponding issues in telecommunications service agreements between CSPs and their business end users (End User).

Layer 2 or layer 3 ethernet compared dark fibre

Dark fibre exists in certain areas because Carriers have laid out more fibre optic infrastructure than needed.  The physical cables are then able to support CSPs who want their own connections.  In comparison, layer 2 or layer 3 ethernet service is used on a leased bandwidth basis.  The network is already activated and the CSP is not generally managing the connection or equipment.

Benefits of dark fibre

Dark fibre has many benefits, including:

  • Giving CSPs full control and freedom over their network, equipment and connection settings. The CSP can implement the type of transmission technology, protocols and features of the network and is a way of CSPs ‘building’ their own network with control over how it works, as the service won’t be shared with others;
  • Dark fibre also allows CSPs to upscale to suit the CSPs’ changing business needs. Consequently, data and speed capacities are only limited by the equipment the CSP uses over the dark fibre network;
  • Point-to-point connections are more reliable as they bypass the carriers core network routing and switching;
  • With linked point-to-point networks, data is highly secure and does not enter the public internet and the CSP can specify the security protocol and standards, including encryption standards and settings; and
  • Creating a network without buying the infrastructure.

Access to dark fibre

Access to dark fibre is a service with the underlying fibre-optic infrastructure leased or purchased from a Supplier.

Therefore, it is important to frame the licence granted to the End User to use the dark fibre service component.  End Users should ensure that that the licence gives them an exclusive licence to use a dark fibre circuit between two end points.  This ensures that the circuit is not shared and traffic impairment and latency is minimised.

Often Suppliers and CSP’s will allocate the fibre optic cores to be used in circuits on the condition that they have the discretion to modify, substitute, replace or relocate the path of the cores.  This can potentially cause service disruption for the End User, so the End User should ensure that advance notice of the change is given in order that the End User may make any required network changes.  The End User should also ensure that any change to the path of the cores can only be done if the standard of service is not materially reduced.

Service Levels

Service levels for dark fibre access provided by Supplier’s must be clearly stated, such as committed service availability and resolution times.  Service levels for a single path may be, say, 99.95%, however the End User should expect that service levels for the service which consists of multiple paths with complete physical separation should be higher, say 99.999%.

As dark fibre agreements are B2B, the End User should insist on service credits for failure to reach the service level availability target on a sliding scale dependent on the length of downtime.  In this sector, a significant downtime of, say, 4 hours in month with an availability of <99.5%, should carry with it a substantial service credit of around 50%.

From the Supplier’s perspective, it should exclude specified events from the calculation of service availability time, such as force majeure, failure of the End User’s equipment, planned maintenance, failure of third party upstream Suppliers and any permitted service suspension rights the CSP has.

Liability

CSPs should insist that the payment of any service credits is sole and exclusive remedy of the End User and exclude liability for any loss of profits, loss of business, loss of data incurred by the End User arising from the failure to achieve the service levels or provide the services.

Security and viruses

CSPs should clearly state that they do not have complete control over the security or content of data passing over the network and any systems operated by third parties.

Further, the CSP should clearly state that any property damage suffered by the End User, say damage to the End User equipment arising from a network virus, is limited and falls under the general liability cap.

Takeaways

Using dark fibre to provide a telecommunications service has many benefits, particularly around scalability, network control and reducing infrastructure spend, however Suppliers still need to ensure that there End User agreements limit their liability and risk exposure.

Links and further references

Legislation

Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth)

Further information about dark fibre agreements for telcos

If you need advice on Carrier to CSP dark fibre access agreements or CSP to End User telecommunications service agreements, please feel free to contact me for a confidential and obligation free discussion.


Related insights for telecommunication service providers

  • Computer code libraries and copyright ownership

    Computer code libraries and copyright ownership

    The Australian case of Redrock Holdings Pty Ltd and Hotline Communications Ltd v Hinkley [2001] VSC 91 has shed light on how the ownership of copyright in code libraries is determined. Learn more about the dispute and its implications for copyright ownership in this blog post.

    Read more …

  • e-Signatures – legally binding on companies?

    e-Signatures – legally binding on companies?

    E-signatures are becoming increasingly popular, but are they legally binding? Find out in this article, which examines the Adelaide Bank case and reveals the limitations of e-signatures when it comes to executing a deed. Click through to learn more.

    Read more …

  • New safety standards proposed for online platforms

    New safety standards proposed for online platforms

    The Australian Government has proposed an Online Safety Act that could significantly change the way businesses manage user-generated content online. Find out how this proposed Act could affect your business and how you can prepare for it.

    Read more …

  • Has my software been copied? – legal test explained

    Has my software been copied? – legal test explained

    This article examines the legal test for a “substantial reproduction” of computer code, as established by the High Court in Data Access Corporation v Powerflex Services Pty Ltd [1999] HCA 49 and further discussed in subsequent cases. The Court will consider the essential features of the work to determine if there has been a substantial…

    Read more …

  • Technology startups – top 5 legal considerations

    Technology startups – top 5 legal considerations

    Start your tech startup on the right footing by considering the top five (5) legal considerations: entity structure and asset protection, intellectual property (IP), confidentiality, contracts, privacy and compliance.

    Read more …

  • Legal concerns in software support agreements

    Legal concerns in software support agreements

    Software developers must consider tech and product support services when taking software to market, such as differences between technical and product support, supported and non-supported items, and differences between installed and hosted software support agreements.

    Read more …

  • De-encryption Bill currently before Joint Committee

    De-encryption Bill currently before Joint Committee

    The much awaited Telecommunications and other Legislation Amendment (Assistance And Access) De-encryption Bill 2018 (De-encryption Bill) has been referred to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security (Joint Committee).  The Joint Committee has allowed three (3) weeks for submissions.  It is a very short time-frame for submissions considering the controversial nature of the Bill.…

    Read more …

  • Making financial forecasts – legal pitfalls for business

    Making financial forecasts – legal pitfalls for business

    Organisations must be aware of the legal risks associated with social media use, such as wrongful dismissal, trade mark infringement, and defamation. This article outlines these risks and provides steps to protect against them.

    Read more …

  • De-encryption laws: compelling tech giants to cooperate with law enforcement

    De-encryption laws: compelling tech giants to cooperate with law enforcement

    The Australian Government is introducing encryption-related legislation that could have significant implications. Get the full scoop on what this Bill could mean for companies and citizens before it is officially announced.

    Read more …


Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend