litigation and disputes resolution

Debt collection – done right

HomePrivate: BlogLegal insightsDebt collection – done right

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

3–5 minutes

There are many effective ways in which you can seek to recover a debt.  That is not the problem. The issue that we often encounter is the presumption that a genuine debt, which is due and payable at law, exists to begin with.  This must, naturally, always be the first question to be asked and unless you can answer it in the affirmative (which is not always easy, and this is precisely the message we are hoping to deliver in this article), you may find that you will be throwing away good money after bad. 

Today, in our complex business environment, there are literally an infinite number of reasons and events that may render a seemingly due and payable debt into one that is not so recoverable, at least not in the conventional way (whereby you issue a short form letter of demand to the debtor which asserts, without explanation, that because “x” number of invoices have been issued to the debtor, that “x” number of dollars must be due and owing to the creditor). This approach may work if you’re dealing with a debt of couple of hundred dollars, (where the debtor will just pay the debt to spare themselves the headache of a dispute) but if you’re dealing with a debt of several thousands of dollars, or tens of thousands of dollars, you can rest assured that the debtor will not make his or her decision to pay so lightly.

We have seen debtors raise a thousand interesting excuses (some legitimate, some not so much) as to why the debt is not due and payable, or they automatically engage legal representatives, in which case you have an entirely different situation on your hands. Even worse, you may have a case where the debtor will seek to frustrate the claim by concealing or destroying documents, records and other physical or intangible property, the subject of your claim, which will make your claim difficult or impossible to prove. Or you may have a debtor that simply disappears of the face of the earth once he or she learns that they are being pursued for a debt, but not before they’ve managed to liquidate their assets, empty their accounts and wire the resources to some offshore account.

Basically, and the moral of the story is this, if you wish to recover a debt, and the debt is for a larger sum of money, you want to ask yourself some of the following questions right at the outset?

Does a debt exist to begin with?

What is the amount of the debt? Is this amount certain or arguable? Why is it due and payable now, and not at some time in the future?

Can I prove that a due and payable debt exists?

Do I have evidence in writing, or was it a handshake agreement?

What are my legal options for recovering the debt?

Do I need to commence Court proceedings? Do I have any effective out of Court options that I can use?

Who is the debtor?

Am I dealing with a company or an individual? What is their trading history, their reputation, their financial health and ability to meet financial commitments? Is the company presently insolvent or in administration? Is the individual a bankrupt or subject to creditor compromise agreements?

Does the debtor have a defence, a set-off or a counterclaim to my claim for payment?

What can the debtor raise as an argument about the quality or fitness for purpose of the goods or services supplied?

What can I do to preserve the debtor’s assets whilst my debt is being recovered?

If you are experiencing difficulty, or uncertainty, in answering some of these questions, and you wish to determine your prospects in recovering your debt, it is always advisable to seek legal advice right at the outset.

Further Information

At Dundas Lawyers, we can undertake a preliminary assessment of your claim, advise on its relative strengths and weaknesses and options you can adopt to advance your claim in the right way.  If you would like further information on the best way to recover your debts, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights about commercial law

  • Re-settlement of trusts – towards a definitive test

    Re-settlement of trusts – towards a definitive test

    The Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) has been amended to allow copyright owners to apply to the Federal Court to block access to infringing websites or online locations outside Australia, and to stop search engine providers from indexing them.

    Read more …

  • Overview of convertible notes

    Overview of convertible notes

    This article examines the features, accounting treatment, benefits, and legal issues of Convertible Notes – a complex financial instrument. It explores how both issuer and holder may benefit, and potential legal issues associated with their use.

    Read more …

  • Changes to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Limited [2014] FCA 634

    Changes to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Limited [2014] FCA 634

    Coles has been found to have breached the Australian Consumer Law (ACL). Find out what this means and how it could affect you. Get in touch for an obligation free and confidential discussion.

    Read more …

  • Misleading and deceptive conduct in commercial dealings

    Misleading and deceptive conduct in commercial dealings

    Business dealings between two or more parties often involve statements or representations during negotiations prior to reaching a concluded bargain. This article considers some case examples of conduct found to be misleading and deceptive in a variety of common business and commercial settings

    Read more …

  • Working with an Expert Adviser

    Working with an Expert Adviser

    Expert advisors may be consulted for business acquisitions, including IT consultants, industry experts, insurance brokers, scientists, lawyers, and patent attorneys. Advisory team must understand role, scope of work, and due date for successful work.

    Read more …

  • Selecting a business valuation methodology

    Selecting a business valuation methodology

    Are you considering a business acquisition? Learn three methods of valuation and which are best for businesses with high asset values, those that are not profitable, and those valued on a going concern basis. Read this article from RSM Bird Cameron Chartered Accountants to find out more.

    Read more …

  • ACCC v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 634

    ACCC v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 634

    In Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Limited [2014] FCA 634, Coles has been accused of misleading customers over their partially-baked bread. Learn more, including the obiter suggested by Allsop CJ, by clicking through to the article.

    Read more …

  • ACCC v A Whistle (1979) PL

    ACCC v A Whistle (1979) PL

    The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has taken action against a business for allegedly publishing false reviews online. Learn more about the case and what businesses can do to avoid breaching the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) and ACCC guidelines.

    Read more …

  • Businesses obligations when trading online – CC Act 2010 (Cth)

    Businesses obligations when trading online – CC Act 2010 (Cth)

    This article provides an overview of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) and its application to online sales, including provisions relating to misleading conduct, single price representation, unconscionable conduct, unfair contract terms and remedies for contraventions.

    Read more …


Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend