A recent test case decision handed down by the Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission (Commission) has ruled that comments posted on social media can amount to workplace bullying even if neither the person who posted them or their target were at work at the time. The case highlights the importance of employers having a strong social media policy in place.
The Full Bench held that the posted comments constitute ‘bullying at work’ if the worker reads them later while at work.
Background facts
In Bowker et al v DP World Melbourne Limited T/A DP World; Maritime Union of Australia, The Victorian Branch and Others three employees of DP World Melbourne Limited each made an application to the Commission under section 789FC of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) for a declaration that they had been bullied at work and for an order to stop the bullying.
The allegations of bullying were made against employees of DP World who were members of the MUA, and by MUA officials.
It was alleged these employees had posted various unreasonable and insulting allegations about the applicants on Facebook.
It was also alleged the applicants were threatened and excluded.
The respondents claimed that the alleged conduct was not made ‘at work’ within the meaning of s.789FD of the Act. This is relevant as the Commission only has jurisdiction to make orders to stop bullying if, among other things, the Commission is satisfied that ‘the worker has been bullied at work’ (s.789FF(1)(b)(i) of the Act).
Meaning of ‘at work’?
The Full Bench stated that the concept of being ‘at work’ encompasses both the performance of work (at any time or location) and when the worker is engaged in some other activity which is authorised or permitted by their employer. This might include being on a meal break or accessing social media while performing work.
Therefore a worker could be considered to be ‘at work’ at any time the worker performs work, regardless of his or her location or the time of day.
As a result, the Full Bench found that the worker need not be ‘at work’ at the time the comments were posted on Facebook. It would suffice if they accessed the comments later while ‘at work’.
Summary
The Full Bench ruling highlights the need for companies to have clear social media policies. These policies must make it clear that posting inappropriate material on social media sites about the company, managers or employees is unacceptable.
Further information
If you are an employer and need advice on issues arising from alleged workplace bullying, please contact us for an obligation free and confidential discussion.
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Disclaimer
This article contains general commentary only. You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice. Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstances.
Related insights about employment law for employers
-
Bullying in the workplace by a body corporate
This investigation reveals the legal implications of workplace bullying in a body corporate. Find out what the Obligations of Reasonableness and the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) mean for workers and how to apply for an order to stop the bullying.
-
What’s an unfair preference claim?
Understand the implications of unsecured debts, insolvent transactions, and unfair preference claims in the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Discover the defences available to protect against unfair preference claims and other related legal matters.
-
Contracting with Minors – is it even possible?
In the innovation economy it is becoming more prevalent for individuals aged less than eighteen (18) years (Minors) to seek to build enterprises. From time to time we are asked to consider whether a client can contract with a Minor. The law in Australia[1] and Queensland[2] states that a Minor is someone who has yet…
-
Changes affecting unfair dismissal and minimum wage
Employers should be aware of three changes to employment law that came into effect on 1 July 2016, which have a significant impact on employee rights, including the unfair dismissal high income threshold, maximum compensation for claims, and minimum wage.
-
Terminating a contract with no set end date
In practice, we come across commercial agreements of varying types (Contracts) that, for whatever reason, don’t provide for a term or an end date (Expiry Date). There may have been reasons for this at the time that can no longer be recalled. It raises a number of issues, particularly where the subject matter of the…
