Corporate law Brisbane

Director resignations – effects from 18 February 2021

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawCorporate lawDirector resignations – effects from 18 February 2021

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

2–4 minutes

Last year, the Treasury Laws Amendment (Combating Illegal Phoenixing) Act 2020 (Phoenixing Act) was enacted to target illegal phoenix activities, where directors create a new company to continue the business of an existing insolvent company to escape paying outstanding debts.  The Phoenixing Act introduces several amendments to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act).  The changes introduced by the Phoenixing Act mainly seeks to prevent directors from improperly backdating resignations or resigning leaving a company without any directors.

Resignation date

From 18 February 2021, the newly commenced section 203AA of the Corporations Act provides that a resignation of a director will now take effect:

  • If, within 28 days after the day the person stopped being a director of the company, ASIC is notified of that fact, the day the person stopped being a director of the company; or
  • In any other case – the day written notice is lodged with ASIC stating that the person has stopped being a director of the company.

Therefore if the director’s resignation is notified to Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) after twenty-eight (28) days of the day the person stopped being a director, the resignation date will be taken to be the date that the written notice is lodged with ASIC.

Under section 203AA(5) of the Corporations Act, It should be noted that a person may apply to ASIC or a Court to fix a different resignation day.  The power to alter a resignation date is discretionary, must be made within a limited timeframe, and any decision is to be determined by a case-to-case basis.

Last director standing

Under section 203AB of the Corporations Act, a director’s resignation will not take effect if the resignation will leave the company with no directors on ASIC records, unless a company is being wound up or other general exceptions such as death of the last director, or where the person did not consent to act as director.

ASIC will now reject the lodgement of Form 484 ‘Change to company details’ or Form 370 ‘Notification by officeholder of resignation or retirement’, where the result would be that the last appointed director ceases their appointment without another director replacing that appointment.

This change is aimed to prevent directors ‘abandoning the ship’ before the company becoming liquidated or otherwise involving in certain wrongdoing.  It will still be applicable regardless of the number of directors resign – therefore if all directors resign on the same day, their resignations will be unsuccessful unless there is one remaining director.

In practice, where internal disputes arise within the company, directors should be mindful of being the ‘last director standing’ and having to be responsible for the former directors’ actions.

With the changes carrying out, it is particularly essential that all directors are fully aware of their obligations and potential liabilities as a director and the timing and circumstances in which they can resign from their position.

Links and further references

Legislation

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)

Treasury Laws Amendment (Combating Illegal Phoenixing) Act 2020

Further information about the changes to the Corporations Act

If you need advice on how the changes to the Corporations Act may affect you and your company, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights about corporate law

  • ACCC guide on country of origin labelling requirements

    ACCC guide on country of origin labelling requirements

    The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has released guidelines for businesses to comply with country of origin legislation and avoid serious penalties. Learn more about the safe harbour defence available and the criteria businesses must meet to stay compliant.

    Read more …

  • Prohibition on the acquisition of relevant interests

    Prohibition on the acquisition of relevant interests

    Section 606 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) prohibits acquiring a relevant interest in voting shares, with exceptions. This article explains the definitions and thresholds that apply, provides a full list of exceptions, relevant case studies, and further resources for legal advice.

    Read more …

  • Transfer Duty in business acquisitions

    Transfer Duty in business acquisitions

    This article explores the application of transfer duty in business acquisitions, including what it is, what is a dutiable transaction, dutiable property, dutiable value, unencumbered value, when it is determined, and who must pay.

    Read more …

  • The GST going concern exemption explained

    The GST going concern exemption explained

    When selling a business in Australia, it’s important to know the going concern exemption to goods and services tax (GST). Learn more about the applicable threshold requirements and legislative references.

    Read more …

  • Drag along rights can be enforced in Court

    Drag along rights can be enforced in Court

    This article examines a 2013 case, William McCausland v Surfing Hardware International Holdings Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 902, which serves as a reminder of the enforceability of drag along clauses in shareholders agreements and the complexity of factors that can affect the legal position of the parties involved.

    Read more …

  • Redeemable preference shares – what to know

    Redeemable preference shares – what to know

    This article discusses the rights, obligations and taxation implications of Redeemable Preference Shares (REDP), hybrid securities with both debt and equity characteristics as defined by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). Case law examples and the process for issuing REDP according to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) are also discussed.

    Read more …

  • Restraint of trade & commercial contracts – a systemic approach

    Restraint of trade & commercial contracts – a systemic approach

    This article provides an invaluable overview of restraint of trade clauses (ROTs). It examines the enforceability of ROTs, their test of reasonableness, and the role of the Court in determining their reasonableness, providing a valuable guide for those wishing to draft and enforce them.

    Read more …

  • Debt collection – done right

    Debt collection – done right

    Uncovering debt and how to recover it effectively can be challenging. Dundas Lawyers can advise on strengths and weaknesses of a debt claim and options to advance it.

    Read more …

  • Businesses’ obligations when trading online – Competition and Consumer Act 2010

    Businesses’ obligations when trading online – Competition and Consumer Act 2010

    The Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) provides legal remedies for those aggrieved by a business’s online conduct, such as penalties, damages, etc. This article explores remedies for misleading, deceptive, unconscionable conduct and unfair contract terms.

    Read more …


Posted

in

, ,
Send this to a friend