Corporate law Brisbane

Director resignations – effects from 18 February 2021

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawCorporate lawDirector resignations – effects from 18 February 2021

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

2–4 minutes

Last year, the Treasury Laws Amendment (Combating Illegal Phoenixing) Act 2020 (Phoenixing Act) was enacted to target illegal phoenix activities, where directors create a new company to continue the business of an existing insolvent company to escape paying outstanding debts.  The Phoenixing Act introduces several amendments to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act).  The changes introduced by the Phoenixing Act mainly seeks to prevent directors from improperly backdating resignations or resigning leaving a company without any directors.

Resignation date

From 18 February 2021, the newly commenced section 203AA of the Corporations Act provides that a resignation of a director will now take effect:

  • If, within 28 days after the day the person stopped being a director of the company, ASIC is notified of that fact, the day the person stopped being a director of the company; or
  • In any other case – the day written notice is lodged with ASIC stating that the person has stopped being a director of the company.

Therefore if the director’s resignation is notified to Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) after twenty-eight (28) days of the day the person stopped being a director, the resignation date will be taken to be the date that the written notice is lodged with ASIC.

Under section 203AA(5) of the Corporations Act, It should be noted that a person may apply to ASIC or a Court to fix a different resignation day.  The power to alter a resignation date is discretionary, must be made within a limited timeframe, and any decision is to be determined by a case-to-case basis.

Last director standing

Under section 203AB of the Corporations Act, a director’s resignation will not take effect if the resignation will leave the company with no directors on ASIC records, unless a company is being wound up or other general exceptions such as death of the last director, or where the person did not consent to act as director.

ASIC will now reject the lodgement of Form 484 ‘Change to company details’ or Form 370 ‘Notification by officeholder of resignation or retirement’, where the result would be that the last appointed director ceases their appointment without another director replacing that appointment.

This change is aimed to prevent directors ‘abandoning the ship’ before the company becoming liquidated or otherwise involving in certain wrongdoing.  It will still be applicable regardless of the number of directors resign – therefore if all directors resign on the same day, their resignations will be unsuccessful unless there is one remaining director.

In practice, where internal disputes arise within the company, directors should be mindful of being the ‘last director standing’ and having to be responsible for the former directors’ actions.

With the changes carrying out, it is particularly essential that all directors are fully aware of their obligations and potential liabilities as a director and the timing and circumstances in which they can resign from their position.

Links and further references

Legislation

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)

Treasury Laws Amendment (Combating Illegal Phoenixing) Act 2020

Further information about the changes to the Corporations Act

If you need advice on how the changes to the Corporations Act may affect you and your company, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights about corporate law

  • Buy/sell agreements for business succession planning

    Buy/sell agreements for business succession planning

    Buy/Sell Agreements, also referred to as Put and Call Option agreements, provide certainty for a business on the death or disablement of an equity participant. This article explores the various ownership and taxation implications, including insurance trusts, cross ownership, individual ownership, SMSF ownership, group insurance policies, and transfer via will.

    Read more …

  • Is your trust deed Bamford compliant?

    Is your trust deed Bamford compliant?

    Trust deeds created more than two years ago may not comply with the Bamford ruling, resulting in consequences for trustees and beneficiaries. Dundas Lawyers can help review trust deeds and ensure they meet legal requirements.

    Read more …

  • Appointing an alternate director explained

    Appointing an alternate director explained

    Appointing an Alternate Director? Understand the powers and responsibilities with our obligation free and confidential discussion. Learn more now.

    Read more …

  • Failure to review contracts can cost millions…

    Failure to review contracts can cost millions…

    The case of The State of NSW v UXC Limited [2011] NSWCS 530 serves as a reminder of the need for organisations to pay close attention to contract details. An oversight can result in costly damages.

    Read more …

  • Is your business ready for investors?

    Is your business ready for investors?

    Want to attract investors? This article reveals the essential steps to make your business “investor ready.” From crafting a solid business plan to securing legal certainty, learn how to prepare your business for successful investment and stand out to potential backers.

    Read more …

  • What exactly is securities hawking?

    What exactly is securities hawking?

    This article examines Section 736 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), which prohibits security hawking. It outlines exemptions, consequences, definitions and further references.

    Read more …

  • Raising capital without disclosure

    Raising capital without disclosure

    This article explains the rules under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for raising capital in Australia without a formal disclosure document, such as a prospectus. It covers exceptions like the “20/12 rule” for small-scale offerings and other exemptions for specific investors. The article also highlights key provisions, restrictions on advertising, and ASIC’s role in regulating…

    Read more …

  • Directors and associates may be personally liable for SGC and PAYG

    Directors and associates may be personally liable for SGC and PAYG

    The Federal Government introduced legislation increasing director liability for non-compliance with Pay as you go (PAYG) and Super guarantee charge (SGC). The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) expanded recovery powers. Click through to learn more and ensure compliance.

    Read more …

  • Directors’ Duties in Australia

    Directors’ Duties in Australia

    Directors of unlisted companies in Australia have a range of legal obligations to uphold. This article examines the duties of directors, as well as the potential penalties for breaching them. Discover more about the three sources of law that apply and how to ensure compliance.

    Read more …


Posted

in

, ,
Send this to a friend