TRADE MARKS — s 62(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – where an Examiner considered that a trade mark under examination was not inherently adapted to distinguish in respect of a certain class, and sought evidence or representations as to the trade mark applicant’s prior use of the mark – where the representations as to prior use by the trade mark applicant were false – where the primary judge held that the trade mark in question was inherently adapted to distinguish, and so evidence of prior use was irrelevant to the registrability of the mark – whether the primary judge erred in holding that evidence or representations are not “false in material particulars” unless false in a way that affects the registrability of the trade mark – Colorado Group Ltd v Strandbags Group Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 160; 67 IPR 628 and Colorado Group Ltd v Strandbags Group Pty Ltd [2007] FCAFC 184; 164 FCR 506, considered – held: the ground of opposition in s 62(b) can be established even where the evidence or representations in ques
Related cases about trademark infringement
-
Container Rotation Systems Pty Ltd v Intermodal Solutions (Group) Pty Ltd [2026] FCA 161
TRADE MARKS – infringement – container rotation systems – containerised bulk handling field – word mark – “rotainer” – whether “rotainer” is purely descriptive – genericism – where the infringer attempted to genericise the registered trade mark – where purported generic and descriptive meaning of the word mark is uncertain – evolution theory of changes…
-
Prezzee Pty Ltd v Epay Australia Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 1662
TRADE MARKS – applicant the registered owner of trade marks comprising or including the word “Prezzee” – applicant using the word “Prezzee” on and in relation to electronic gift cards – respondent incorporating the word “Prezzy” on physical and electronic gift cards – applicant seeking interlocutory relief pending judgment on an action alleging trade mark…
-
NCL Corporation Ltd v Norwegian Brand Ltd [2025] FCA 1613
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – trade marks – international registration designating Australia – objection to extension of international protection to Australia – whether trade mark applicant had intention to use mark in Australia – where trade mark applicant did not participate in appeal proceeding – no intention to use found PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – international service –…
