Lawyers for litigation

Purcell v IDN24 [2025] FCA 215

Purcell v IDN24 [2025] FCA 215

CONTEMPT OF COURT – Contempt of the Australian Crime Commission punishable as contempt of Federal Court – failure or refusal to answer questions – whether a purported lack of recollection could amount to a failure or refusal to answer questions – whether lack of memory is inherently implausible – inferences – Applicant failed to discharge its burden – application dismissed


Related cases on Contempt

  • Purcell v IDN24 [2025] FCA 215

    CONTEMPT OF COURT – Contempt of the Australian Crime Commission punishable as contempt of Federal Court – failure or refusal to answer questions – whether a purported lack of recollection could amount to a failure or refusal to answer questions – whether lack of memory is inherently implausible – inferences – Applicant failed to discharge…

  • Guoao Holding Group Co Ltd v Xue (Sentencing) [2024] FCA 1503

      CONTEMPT OF COURT – consideration of sentence for convictions for criminal and civil contempt of court by breach of freezing orders – imposition of sentence Related cases – contempt Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2024/2024fca1503For more information, see the original judgement.

  • Transportable Shade Sheds Australia Pty Ltd v Aussie Shade Sheds Pty Ltd (Contempt Application) [2024] FCA 1112

    CONTEMPT OF COURT – application brought in relation to alleged non-compliance with order which restrained conduct by reference to list of assets contained in schedule to agreement annexed to affidavit – order served without annexure – to overcome defect in service, oral application made at hearing to amend statement of charge to rely upon further…

Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2025/2025fca0215

For more information, see the original judgement.


Posted

in

Send this to a friend