Corporate law Brisbane

New Anti-Money Laundering Bill introduced

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

4–5 minutes

On 11 September 2024 the (Bill) was introduced to the House of Representatives.[1]  The Bill will amend the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (Cth) (AML/CTF Act) to include provisions regarding deterrence, detection and disruption of money laundering and terrorism financing.[2]  Most changes will take effect from 31 March 2026.

Objectives of the Anti-Money Laundering Bill

The Bill has three (3) objectives:

  • allowing the AML/CTF Act to account for high-risk services provided by tranche two (2) entities which are lawyers, accountants, real estate agents, and property managers in Schedule 1 Division 2 section 26C;[3]
  • simplification and clarification of the AML/CTF Act so that businesses have better flexibility and less regulatory impact when attempting to prevent and detect financial crimes in Schedule 5;[4] and
  • modernising the regulation of digital currency, as well as virtual asset and payments technology in Schedule 6.[5]

Key changes in the Bill

The Bill’s nine (9) key changes include:

  • Changes to AML/CTF program requirements: This includes risk assessment to consider money laundering, terrorism financing and proliferation financing risks the reporting entity may reasonably face, proportionate risk mitigation measures to respond to the risk assessment, a new simplified reporting group concept to allow reporting entities to manage and mitigate common risks more efficiently, roles and responsibilities of a reporting entity’s governing body and AML/CTF compliance officer in Schedule 1.[6]
  • Changes to customer due diligence: Includes reporting entities being required to identify and verify the identity of their customer and certain associated persons, and understand the money laundering, terrorism financing and proliferation financing risks associated with providing designated services to the customer and take steps to mitigate these risks, as well as changes to the customer due diligence exemption for assisting investigation of certain offences, and the exemption for the gaming and gambling sector in Schedule 2.[7]
  • Regulating additional high-risk services: The Bill will extend the AML/CTF regime to certain higher risk services provided by gatekeeper professions such as estate professionals, dealers in precious stones and precious metals, and professional service providers such as lawyers, conveyancers, accountants, and trust and company service providers in Schedule 3.[8]
  • Legal professional privilege includes privilege under Division 1 of Part 3.10 of the Evidence Act 1995 where legal professional; privilege is defined in section 242 and the guidelines in relation to legal professional privilege are provided in section 242A in Schedule 4.[9]
  • Changes to the tipping off offence in Schedule 5.[10]
  • Changes for the virtual assets sector: This includes exchanges between virtual assets, transfers of virtual assets of behalf of customers, safekeeping or administration of virtual assets, and participation in and provision of financial services related to an issuer’s offer and, or the sale of a virtual asset in Schedule 6.[11]
  • Changes for the financial sector: This includes value transfer obligations and international value transfer service reporting, and bearer negotiable instruments in Schedule 7, and Schedule 8.[12]
  • AUSTRAC information-gathering powers: This includes a new examination power, notice to produce power, and ‘authorisation to produce’ in Schedule 9.[13]
  • Repeal of the Financial Transaction Reports Act 1988: This is located in Schedule 11.[14]

Customer due diligence standards substantially updated

The Explanatory Memorandum to the Bill clarifies that customer due diligence should be focused on the outcomes to be achieved.[15]

Key obligations for reporting entities

If the Bill is passed, reporting entities under the AML/CTF Act will be obligated to:

  • enrol with AUSTRAC;
  • develop and maintain an AML/CTF program tailored to their business;
  • conduct initial consumer due diligence;
  • conduct ongoing customer due diligence;
  • report certain transactions and suspicious activities; and
  • make and keep records.[16]

Links and further references

Legislation

Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment Bill 2024

Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment Bill 2024 Explanatory Memorandum

Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules Instrument 2007 (No. 1)

Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing (Prescribed Foreign Countries) Regulations 2018

Further information about anti-money laundering compliance

If your business needs advice on any aspect of anti-money laundering compliance, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:

[1] Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism Financing Amendment Bill 2024 (Cth).

[2] Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (Cth).

[3] Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism Financing Amendment Bill 2024 (Cth) Schedule 1 Division 2 section 26C.

[4] Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism Financing Amendment Bill 2024 (Cth) Schedule 5.

[5] Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism Financing Amendment Bill 2024 (Cth) Schedule 6.

[6] Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism Financing Amendment Bill 2024 (Cth) Schedule 1.

[7] Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism Financing Amendment Bill 2024 (Cth) Schedule 2.

[8] Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism Financing Amendment Bill 2024 (Cth) Schedule 3.

[9]  Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism Financing Amendment Bill 2024 (Cth) Schedule 4 section 242, section 242A.

[10] Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism Financing Amendment Bill 2024 (Cth) Schedule 5.

[11] Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism Financing Amendment Bill 2024 (Cth) Schedule 6.

[12] Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism Financing Amendment Bill 2024 (Cth) Schedule 7; Schedule 8.

[13] Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism Financing Amendment Bill 2024 (Cth) Schedule 9.

[14] Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism Financing Amendment Bill 2024 (Cth) Schedule 11.

[15] Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment Bill 2024 (Cth) Explanatory Memorandum.

[16] Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism Financing Amendment Bill 2024 (Cth) Schedule 1.


Related insights about anti-money laundering compliance

  • Director’s identification numbers to become a reality

    Director’s identification numbers to become a reality

    On 12 June 2020, the Treasury Laws Amendment (Registries Modernisation and Other Measures) Act 2020 introduced the requirement for all Australian company directors to have a “Director Identification Number” (DIN).  The DIN will become a single identifier for each director across all of their office holdings with the true identity of each director is verified…

    Read more …

  • What exactly is a section 293 direction?

    What exactly is a section 293 direction?

    There are several reasons why a shareholder may require financial information, primarily they are denied access to the ‘accounts’ so as to make informed decision about the company.  The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act) provides various mechanisms for shareholders to obtain financial and accounting information about a company, to allow them to access full and…

    Read more …

  • Director’s misuse of funds held to be oppressive

    Director’s misuse of funds held to be oppressive

    This article explores shareholder oppression, examining Section 232 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and Martin v Australian Squash Club Pty Ltd (1996) 14 ACLC 452, to understand the cumulative effect of individual acts.

    Read more …

  • What are sophisticated investors?

    What are sophisticated investors?

    This article provides an overview of the requirements for a person to be a sophisticated investor under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and the Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth). It covers the definition of ‘person’, the Assets Test and Income Test, Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) guidance, and the complexities of self-managed super funds.

    Read more …

  • e-Signatures – legally binding on companies?

    e-Signatures – legally binding on companies?

    E-signatures are becoming increasingly popular, but are they legally binding? Find out in this article, which examines the Adelaide Bank case and reveals the limitations of e-signatures when it comes to executing a deed. Click through to learn more.

    Read more …

  • Company funds must be used for company purposes

    Company funds must be used for company purposes

    This article examines the legal principles behind when it is permissible to use company funds, focusing on the case of Re D G Brims and Sons Pty Ltd (1995) 16 ASCR 559, which established that company funds must only be used for company purposes and not to pay for legal costs of proceedings for the…

    Read more …

  • The running account defence to unfair preference claims

    The running account defence to unfair preference claims

    Creditors who have been paid by a customer on credit may find themselves facing an Unfair Preference claim letter from a liquidator. Learn more about the defences available to creditors and how to protect yourself from repaying more than your fair share.

    Read more …

  • Unfair preferences & the set-off defence

    Unfair preferences & the set-off defence

    Under section 588FA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act) an unfair preference is defined as a transaction, such as payment of an outstanding debt, between a company and an unsecured creditor which results in that unsecured creditor receiving more than it would have received if it had to prove in the winding up of the…

    Read more …

  • Unfair preferences – the Doctrine of Ultimate Effect

    Unfair preferences – the Doctrine of Ultimate Effect

    Explore the Doctrine of Ultimate Effect, running account defence and more in this article by Dundas Lawyers. Learn how these concepts can provide a defence to an unfair preference claim under Section 588FA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

    Read more …

Send this to a friend