Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) have been making headlines recently for being sold at auction for enormous sums of money. Business school drop-out turned American DJ, 3LAU, apparently sold his NFT collection just over a month ago for $11.6 million USD ($15 million AUD).[1] Grimes, otherwise known as Claire Boucher, a prominent musician and partner to Tesla CEO, Elon Musk, sold multiple digital artworks amounting to a total of $6 million USD ($7.79 million AUD).[2]
So what are NFTs and how can they help you protect your intellectual property (IP)?
How an NFT works
Non-fungible simply means unique or distinguishable from similar goods or assets within a market of trade. This ‘non-fungibility’ is what distinguished NFTs from other tokens, like Bitcoin for example, which are tradeable currency indistinguishable from other Bitcoins. NFT’s are integrated as part of a blockchain, generally, the Ethereum blockchain.[3]
The token element of an NFT represents the method by which ownership can be confirmed. Ownership over cryptocurrencies and similar ‘digital properties’ is represented by tokens, which are like digital certificates establishing ownership. Artists may designate or allocate a particular and distinguishable NFT over any digital artwork, including renderings, videos, paintings, albums or even electronic tickets to see their performances.
How do NFTs benefit rights holders
If you are the owner of digital IP, NFTs provide a meaningful way to either maintain ownership in that IP or transfer it to a prospective purchaser. NFT’s are maintained on a blockchain which can be understood as a type of ledger which establishes the terms of sale of an NFT. That is, the transfer of NFTs between contracting parties is facilitated, or underwritten, by blockchain technology. As an NFT owner, proprietary rights in the artwork to which an NFT is allocated are protected by the security of blockchain technology.
Whilst, and this point is not decided in Australian law, NFTs may provide legal rights, they does not prevent others from using the IP. Of course, neither does a trademark or patent, but NFTs are not some revolutionary creations addressing this issue. In much the same way that Van Gogh’s Starry Night can be reprinted and owned by any individual, so too can works protected by NFTs. In fact, you can view IP protected by NFTs here and here.
Legal issues that can arise with NFTs
As NFTs are relatively new, the legal requirements and implications have not yet fully presented themselves. This makes the possible legal issues of NFTs quite broad and indefinable at this stage. However, there are some things worth considering. Most notably, what the purchaser is receiving in exchange for their money may not be accurate. For example consider the sale of a animate GIF that the purchaser offers a very large monetary sum for at auction because they believe, possibly supported by actual or implied representations of such on behalf of the seller, that they are obtaining the one true original copy when they are in fact not.
Another concern is data security. An NFT on a blockchain has a publicly verifiable chain of ownership meaning that, post-purchase, the purchaser has unrestricted access to the seller’s digital wallet address allowing them to see all transactions contained within.
Takeaways
NFTs have been making a name for themselves in the media of late as the new way to own IP. As they are non-fungible, they do not equate to something of distinct monetary value, like exchanging currency would. Ownership does not prevent others from accessing and using the IP. Owning an NFT is like owning an original artwork. The full legal framework and implications are still to be defined, however, accuracy of NFT description at sale and data security post-purchase can raise some concerning legal issues for both NFT sellers and purchasers.
Further information about non-fungible tokens
If you need advice on the purchase or sale of IP or the transfer of IP rights, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Disclaimer
This article contains general commentary only. You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice. Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstances.
[1] Forbes (2021). Largest NFT Sale Ever Came From A Business School Dropout Turned Star DJ. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/abrambrown/2021/03/03/3lau-nft-nonfungible-tokens-justin-blau/?sh=75635f84643b.
[2] BBC (2021). NFT blockchain drives surge in digital art auctions. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-56252738.
[3] Ethereum is a popular cryptocurrency with its own blockchain.
Related insights about IP purchase, sale or transfer
-
Ownership of employee inventions – disputing ownership of patents
Section 35(6) of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) establishes a general rule that an employer will own the copyright in many types of works if they were created by an employee or apprentice, in the course of their employment. Unfortunately, there is no such legislative equivalent in the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) (Act). The absence…
-
Reverse engineering of software – legal boundaries?
Reverse engineering software in Australia is complex, with legal implications and cases providing authority on “infringing” verses “non-infringing” reverse engineering. Courts have provided some protection to intellectual property (IP) through licence agreements and distinguishing between ideas and expressions of a program.
-
Dallas Buyers Club wins preliminary discovery order
The Federal Court of Australia has granted a controversial application that could allow copyright holders to identify and pursue alleged infringers of their work. Find out what conditions were imposed on the copyright holders and what this could mean for the future of online copyright infringement.
-
Plant breeder’s rights – an introduction
This article explores the Plant Breeders Rights Act 1994 (Cth) and its implications for plant variety protection. Learn more about the exclusive rights granted to plant breeders, the registration requirements, and the exceptions that apply.
-
Selling counterfeit poles breaches IP rights
Australian sellers Vertical Leisure Ltd and Dance4Me Pty Ltd have won AU$394,800 in damages from competitor Skyrunner Pty Ltd, who sold counterfeit “X-Pole” dancing poles. The Federal Circuit Court’s decision provides guidance for calculating damages for multiple IP rights breaches.
-
Trade mark infringement
A registered trade mark is a sign used to distinguish traders’ goods/services from others. This article explains the form, purpose, infringement and penalties of trade marks, as governed by the Trade Marks Act 1995 in Australia.
-
Social media rant costs respondent over $350k!
Posting unsubstantiated allegations on social media can be risky. Learn about the consequences of a case in which a business was found to have misled and deceived customers, and how to protect yourself from similar situations. Read the full article to find out more.
-
Employee or contractor – impact on intellectual property
This article explores the legal implications of determining whether an individual is an employee or contractor. Learn how a multi-factor test can help to identify the correct status, and understand the potential impact on intellectual property.
-
Copyright in artistic works – Australian law
Discover how copyright law protects artistic works and what to consider when reproducing them. Learn about the implications of ownership, what constitutes ‘substantial’ infringement, and how to get permission or licence a copyright.
