Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) have been making headlines recently for being sold at auction for enormous sums of money. Business school drop-out turned American DJ, 3LAU, apparently sold his NFT collection just over a month ago for $11.6 million USD ($15 million AUD).[1] Grimes, otherwise known as Claire Boucher, a prominent musician and partner to Tesla CEO, Elon Musk, sold multiple digital artworks amounting to a total of $6 million USD ($7.79 million AUD).[2]
So what are NFTs and how can they help you protect your intellectual property (IP)?
How an NFT works
Non-fungible simply means unique or distinguishable from similar goods or assets within a market of trade. This ‘non-fungibility’ is what distinguished NFTs from other tokens, like Bitcoin for example, which are tradeable currency indistinguishable from other Bitcoins. NFT’s are integrated as part of a blockchain, generally, the Ethereum blockchain.[3]
The token element of an NFT represents the method by which ownership can be confirmed. Ownership over cryptocurrencies and similar ‘digital properties’ is represented by tokens, which are like digital certificates establishing ownership. Artists may designate or allocate a particular and distinguishable NFT over any digital artwork, including renderings, videos, paintings, albums or even electronic tickets to see their performances.
How do NFTs benefit rights holders
If you are the owner of digital IP, NFTs provide a meaningful way to either maintain ownership in that IP or transfer it to a prospective purchaser. NFT’s are maintained on a blockchain which can be understood as a type of ledger which establishes the terms of sale of an NFT. That is, the transfer of NFTs between contracting parties is facilitated, or underwritten, by blockchain technology. As an NFT owner, proprietary rights in the artwork to which an NFT is allocated are protected by the security of blockchain technology.
Whilst, and this point is not decided in Australian law, NFTs may provide legal rights, they does not prevent others from using the IP. Of course, neither does a trademark or patent, but NFTs are not some revolutionary creations addressing this issue. In much the same way that Van Gogh’s Starry Night can be reprinted and owned by any individual, so too can works protected by NFTs. In fact, you can view IP protected by NFTs here and here.
Legal issues that can arise with NFTs
As NFTs are relatively new, the legal requirements and implications have not yet fully presented themselves. This makes the possible legal issues of NFTs quite broad and indefinable at this stage. However, there are some things worth considering. Most notably, what the purchaser is receiving in exchange for their money may not be accurate. For example consider the sale of a animate GIF that the purchaser offers a very large monetary sum for at auction because they believe, possibly supported by actual or implied representations of such on behalf of the seller, that they are obtaining the one true original copy when they are in fact not.
Another concern is data security. An NFT on a blockchain has a publicly verifiable chain of ownership meaning that, post-purchase, the purchaser has unrestricted access to the seller’s digital wallet address allowing them to see all transactions contained within.
Takeaways
NFTs have been making a name for themselves in the media of late as the new way to own IP. As they are non-fungible, they do not equate to something of distinct monetary value, like exchanging currency would. Ownership does not prevent others from accessing and using the IP. Owning an NFT is like owning an original artwork. The full legal framework and implications are still to be defined, however, accuracy of NFT description at sale and data security post-purchase can raise some concerning legal issues for both NFT sellers and purchasers.
Further information about non-fungible tokens
If you need advice on the purchase or sale of IP or the transfer of IP rights, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Disclaimer
This article contains general commentary only. You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice. Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstances.
[1] Forbes (2021). Largest NFT Sale Ever Came From A Business School Dropout Turned Star DJ. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/abrambrown/2021/03/03/3lau-nft-nonfungible-tokens-justin-blau/?sh=75635f84643b.
[2] BBC (2021). NFT blockchain drives surge in digital art auctions. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-56252738.
[3] Ethereum is a popular cryptocurrency with its own blockchain.
Related insights about IP purchase, sale or transfer
-
Website blocking orders – what has to be proven?
This article provides an overview of the requirements for companies wishing to offer equity-based crowd-sourced funding in Australia. It covers the types of companies eligible, the type of securities allowed, and the issuer cap.
-
Top 11 legal tips for selling a technology business
These tips include asset sale or share sale, intellectual property ownership, legal and accounting due diligence, change of control issues, restraint of trade clauses, key personnel, and more.
-
s115A Copyright Act – infringement outside Australia
This article examines the concept of shareholder oppression and provides examples of when the Court has found oppressive conduct, as well as when it has not. It also outlines the remedies the Court prefers when faced with oppressive conduct.
-
Do meta tags amount to trade mark infringement?
Find out how the case of Accor Australia & New Zealand Hospitality Pty Ltd v Liv Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 554 highlights the potential risk of trademark infringements to businesses. Read more to discover the case background, takeaways, and tips to protect your business.
-
Assigning intellectual property and the right to sue
This case examines Re Taypar Pty Ltd v Benko Santic [1989] FCA 543, which determined that an assignee of intellectual property rights cannot sue for pre-assignment infringements, unless the assignment explicitly assigns a right to do so.
-
Evidence from the Wayback Machine accepted
Australian Courts are increasingly considering the use of evidence from the Wayback Machine, but questions remain as to whether they will accept such reports in practice and what will be allowed?
-
Adaptations and computer code – copyright issues
An adaption in copyright is the exclusive right of the owner of the work in question. Section 10 of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (Act) defines adaption as it relates to literary works in dramatic and non-dramatic forms, in a computer program and in relation to a musical work. The rights that apply to adaptions…
-
Innocent copyright infringement explained
This article examines the legal defence of “innocent infringement” in the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Find out what evidence is needed to prove both the subjective and objective elements of this defence, and learn the key takeaways to consider when using it in copyright disputes.
-
Know-how vs confidential information
Understand the difference between “know-how” and confidential information when it comes to employer-employee relationships. Find out how to protect confidential trade secrets and use broad contractual terms to ensure protection. Click through to get the full details.
