Corporate law Brisbane

Prohibition on the acquisition of relevant interests

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawCorporate lawProhibition on the acquisition of relevant interests

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

2–3 minutes

Section 606 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corps Act) contains a prima facie prohibition against the acquisition of relevant interests in voting shares.

What is a relevant interest?

Relevant interest in relation to securities is defined in section 9 of the Corps Act as taking its meaning from section 608 and section 609.

Section 608 provides that a person has a relevant interest if they:

  • are the holder of the securities;
  • have the power to exercise or to control a right attached to securities; or
  • have the power to dispose of the securities;

Subsections 2 and 3 of section 608 further provide for what is broadly described as “grouping provisions” meaning that for the purposes of determining whether or not a person has a relevant interest, interests controlled through trusts and bodies corporate are included. The remainder of section 608 contains other requirements which, if satisfied will mean that a person has a relevant interest.

What is the threshold that applies?

The prohibition against the acquisition of a relevant interest contained in section 606 applies to:

  • listed companies;
  • an unlisted public company with more than 50 members;

Therefore, by exception it does not apply to unlisted public companies which have less than 50 members or proprietary limited companies.

Where the person acquires the interest through a transaction in relation to securities and because of the transaction a person’s voting power in the company increases:

  • from 20% or below to more than 20%; or
  • for a starting point that is above 20% and below 90%.

Note 3 to section 606 of the Corps Act provides that:

If the acquisition of relevant interests in an unlisted company with 50 or fewer members leads to the acquisition of a relevant interest in another company that is an unlisted company with more than 50 members, or a listed company, the acquisition is caught by this section because of its effect on that other company”.

There is also an implicit part of section 606 which prohibits the entering into a transaction which creates a relevant interest on behalf of a third party.

Exceptions

Section 611 of the Corps Act contains the exceptions to the acquisition of a relevant interest.

There are twenty (20) exceptions, notably subsection 9, known as the “creeping provisions” which allow a 3% creep in 6 months and section 7 which provides for approval by resolution of the general members of the company, subject to certain conditions. Refer to section 611 of the Corps Act for a complete list of exceptions.

Links and further references

Legislation

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s606

Cases

Australian Pipeline Limited v Alinta Limited [2007] FCAFC 55 – application for a declaration of contravention of s606

McMillan Properties Pty Ltd v W C Penfold Ltd and Anor [2001] NSWSC 1173 (11 December 2001) – a useful analysis of section 606 is conducted by Young CJ at 15

Viento Group Limited [2011] ATP 1 (13 January 2011)

Further information

If you need advice or further information about acquiring a relevant interest in voting shares, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights about corporate and contract law

  • Director’s identification numbers to become a reality

    Director’s identification numbers to become a reality

    On 12 June 2020, the Treasury Laws Amendment (Registries Modernisation and Other Measures) Act 2020 introduced the requirement for all Australian company directors to have a “Director Identification Number” (DIN).  The DIN will become a single identifier for each director across all of their office holdings with the true identity of each director is verified…

    Read more …

  • What exactly is a section 293 direction?

    What exactly is a section 293 direction?

    There are several reasons why a shareholder may require financial information, primarily they are denied access to the ‘accounts’ so as to make informed decision about the company.  The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act) provides various mechanisms for shareholders to obtain financial and accounting information about a company, to allow them to access full and…

    Read more …

  • Director’s misuse of funds held to be oppressive

    Director’s misuse of funds held to be oppressive

    This article explores shareholder oppression, examining Section 232 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and Martin v Australian Squash Club Pty Ltd (1996) 14 ACLC 452, to understand the cumulative effect of individual acts.

    Read more …

  • What are sophisticated investors?

    What are sophisticated investors?

    This article provides an overview of the requirements for a person to be a sophisticated investor under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and the Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth). It covers the definition of ‘person’, the Assets Test and Income Test, Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) guidance, and the complexities of self-managed super funds.

    Read more …

  • e-Signatures – legally binding on companies?

    e-Signatures – legally binding on companies?

    E-signatures are becoming increasingly popular, but are they legally binding? Find out in this article, which examines the Adelaide Bank case and reveals the limitations of e-signatures when it comes to executing a deed. Click through to learn more.

    Read more …

  • Company funds must be used for company purposes

    Company funds must be used for company purposes

    This article examines the legal principles behind when it is permissible to use company funds, focusing on the case of Re D G Brims and Sons Pty Ltd (1995) 16 ASCR 559, which established that company funds must only be used for company purposes and not to pay for legal costs of proceedings for the…

    Read more …

  • The running account defence to unfair preference claims

    The running account defence to unfair preference claims

    Creditors who have been paid by a customer on credit may find themselves facing an Unfair Preference claim letter from a liquidator. Learn more about the defences available to creditors and how to protect yourself from repaying more than your fair share.

    Read more …

  • Unfair preferences & the set-off defence

    Unfair preferences & the set-off defence

    Under section 588FA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act) an unfair preference is defined as a transaction, such as payment of an outstanding debt, between a company and an unsecured creditor which results in that unsecured creditor receiving more than it would have received if it had to prove in the winding up of the…

    Read more …

  • Unfair preferences – the Doctrine of Ultimate Effect

    Unfair preferences – the Doctrine of Ultimate Effect

    Explore the Doctrine of Ultimate Effect, running account defence and more in this article by Dundas Lawyers. Learn how these concepts can provide a defence to an unfair preference claim under Section 588FA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

    Read more …


Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend