software development disputes

What are Software Development Agreements?

Home → Legal insights → What are Software Development Agreements?

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

2–3 minutes

A software development agreement (Software Development Agreement) is a contract where one party (Developer) agrees to develop a software application for another party (Client).  Concise drafting is key in Software Development Agreements to ensure that the resulting software meets the Client’s requirements and also does not allow for scope to the detriment of the Developer.


Common clauses in Software Development Agreements

The provisions in this sort of agreement will vary according to the size and scope of the software to be developed, but commonly include:

  • acceptance testing – details any testing requirement the software must pass to be accepted by the Client;
  • confidentiality – imposes obligations on the parties to keep all confidential information strictly confidential, except in listed circumstances;
  • development stages – deadlines for the provision of software modules (also known as “deliverables”) by the Developer;
  • escrow – requires the Developer to deliver the software to an escrow agent and outlines timeframes and responsibility for payment of such delivery;
  • hosting – details which party is responsible for hosting the Software;
  • indemnity – requires the Developer to compensate the Client for any loss or damage which results from a breach of the Contract;
  • intellectual property ownership – states which party owns copyright in the software source code and any other materials provided to the Client;
  • marketing – details whether the Developer is allowed to use the Software development as part of its marketing and advertising campaigns ;
  • moral rights – the Client may request moral rights (that is, the right to attribution and the right to freedom from derogatory treatment) in the software are waived in the Client’s favour;
  • restraint of trade – the Client may request that the Developer does not create competing software for the Client’s competitors for a specified period of time after expiration or termination of the Agreement; and
  • warranty period – how long the Software should work without major errors or bugs.

Common problems with Software Development Agreements

A common issue is not adequately addressing ownership of intellectual property (IP) in the software itself.  Under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) ownership of copyright in an original work generally rests with the original “author” of the work – in this instance the Developer.  However, this can create issues for the Client who may wish to expand or modify the software in the future.  Alternatively, assigning all copyright in the software to the Client can cause problems for the Developer, in that it prohibits them from using their common core libraries.  To avoid these sorts of issues, it is best that they be documented in the Developer’s standard form contracts.

Links and further references

Cases

Intelmail Explorenet Pty Ltd v Vardanian (No 2) [2009] FCA 1018

Legislation

Copyright Act 1968 (Cth)

Further information about Software Developer Agreements

If you need assistance drafting a Software Development Agreement, please telephone me for an obligation free and confidential discussion.


Related insights about Software Developer Agreements

  • Telegram terror content: eSafety alleges Online Safety Act breach

    Telegram terror content: eSafety alleges Online Safety Act breach

    Australia’s eSafety Commissioner has commenced civil penalty proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia (Court) against Emirati-based Telegram FZ-LLC (Trade License Number 94349) (Telegram), alleging that it failed to comply with obligations to detect, deter and disrupt the distribution of pro-terror material and remove unlawful material from its messaging service. The proceedings, eSafety Commissioner v…

    Read more …

  • Privacy Amendment Bill 2026 proposes Privacy Act amendments

    Privacy Amendment Bill 2026 proposes Privacy Act amendments

    On 31 August 2026, the Australian Government published a Consultation Paper and released an exposure draft of the Privacy Amendment (Personal Data Protection) Bill 2026 (Bill), proposing amendments to the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) (Privacy Act).  The Bill proposes amendments to the Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) codified in Schedule 1 of the Privacy Act. The…

    Read more …

  • Digital Duty of Care Bill 2026

    Digital Duty of Care Bill 2026

    The Australian Labor party has introduced an exposure draft of the Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill 2026 (Digital Duty of Care Bill/Draft Bill) for “consultation”.  The Digital Duty of Care Bill proposes to make a number of minor (and major) amendments to the Online Safety Act 2021(Cth) (Online Safety Act) and adds…

    Read more …

  • AI compliance programs: one size does not fit all

    AI compliance programs: one size does not fit all

    Australia does not have any standalone legislation addressing how businesses can safely implement Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Use of AI by Australian businesses is, however, regulated, not by a patchwork combination of Federal and State legislation, industry-specific legislation and standards, professional body rules and guidance issued by government departments and other regulators.  This article discusses the…

    Read more …

  • AI evidence misleading Court:  Ba v Sterling Parts Australia

    AI evidence misleading Court: Ba v Sterling Parts Australia

    On 17 June 2026, Symons J delivered judgment in the case of Ba v Sterling Parts Australia Pty Ltd [2026] FedCFamC2G 1245 (Ba v Sterling Parts).  Ba v Sterling Parts was a proceeding brought by Weiman Ba (Applicant) in the second division of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Court).  Symons J dismissed…

    Read more …

  • Office of AI announced by Federal Government

    Office of AI announced by Federal Government

    On 15 July 2026, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese (Prime Minister) announced by media release an expansion of the Federal Government’s (Government) existing artificial intelligence (AI) governance framework, including the establishment of a new Office of AI as well as plans to legislate national standards governing large-scale data centres, AI training and the use of Australian…

    Read more …

  • AI businesses should have duty of care

    AI businesses should have duty of care

    In a recent interview with InnovationAus.com, Victorian Senator Michelle Ananda-Rajah (Senator) emphasised the need to adopt digital duty of care laws for artificial intelligence (AI) companies.[1]  As a representative of the ALP and former AI start-up founder, the Senator calls for the proposed digital duty of care to apply to AI companies.  If implemented, the…

    Read more …

  • Federal Court orders winding up of crypto mining investment scheme

    Federal Court orders winding up of crypto mining investment scheme

    The Federal Court of Australia delivered judgment in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v NGS Crypto Pty Ltd (No 5) [2025] FCA 1611, on 18 December 2025 ordering the winding up of two (2) cryptocurrency related entities after finding that they operated an unlicensed financial services business and an unregistered managed investment scheme in contravention…

    Read more …

  • Online Safety – is your online business a DIS or a RES?

    Online Safety – is your online business a DIS or a RES?

    Whether your online business has to comply with the obligations contained in the Online Safety Act 2021 (Cth) (OSA), and related standards and industry codes will largely depend on how your business is classified because of the functionality it provides to end users in Australia.

    Read more …

Send this to a friend