Corporate law Brisbane

What are Teaming Agreements?

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawCorporate lawWhat are Teaming Agreements?

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

3–4 minutes

A teaming agreement (Teaming Agreement) is a contract between two or more parties (Team Members) that is used to regulate the rights and obligations where one of them pursues a tender or contract with a with a third party (Prime Contract).  Once the Prime Contract is entered into between the third party and Team Member # 1, a sub-contract is executed between Team Member # 1 and the other Team Member(s) to enable Team Member # 1 to discharge its obligations under the Prime Contract. 

The benefits of Teaming Agreements are that they allow parties to pool resources for a limited purpose (Permitted Purpose), without necessarily requiring the establishment of a joint venture entity – however, the Team Members could do this if they wanted to.

Common clauses in Teaming Agreements

A Teaming Agreement is flexible depending on the resources of the Team Members and the contract they hope to pursue, however, common clauses include:

  • confidentiality – neither Team Member may disclose the confidential information of the other;
  • dispute resolution – which jurisdiction’s laws govern the agreement and are there are any mandatory pre-filing dispute resolution practices, such as mediation or arbitration;
  • intellectual property – who owns the intellectual property created during the term of the Agreement, and is any intellectual property assigned or licenced from one Team Member to the other;
  • liability – neither Team Member is liable to the other in respect of any loss or damage suffered or incurred in respect of goods or services supplied pursuant to this Agreement, except to the extent that the loss or damage is caused by resources contributed by one Team Member infringing any intellectual property rights;
  • leadership – who controls the contracting process and how is communication to be regulated;
  • management – a group of representatives from each Team Member (Teaming Committee) usually meets regularly to manage the pursuit of the contractor;
  • non-circumvention – neither Party should submit or participate in independent proposals to the third party and both parties should act in good faith when discharging their obligations under the Agreement;
  • parties – the relationship between the parties is that of prime contractor and subcontractor, not that of principal and agent;
  • resource contributions – what property, human resources and financial resources are the Team Members required to provide in order to tender for the Prime Contract, and does the other Team Member have a licence to use these resources; and
  • termination – what events trigger a right to termination and how much notice (if any) is required.

Common issues with Teaming Agreements

One limitation with Teaming Agreements is that they need to be renegotiated for every new Prime Contract.  There is also the risk that one Team Member will go around or circumvent the other Team Member in order to contract directly with the third party, or that one Team Member will solicit clients or employees from the other.  This is why clear non-circumvention clauses are important elements of Teaming Agreements.

Links and further references

Cases

BNWP Enterprises Pty Ltd v Unisys Australia Ltd [1997] FCA 1– in this case the parties’ tender on the Prime Contract was successful but they were unable to conclude negotiations on a Sub-contract.  The Federal Court held that the Teaming Agreement was a contract for a joint bid, therefore the Prime Contract was subject to the parties entering into a binding Sub-contract.

Awards

Lawyer Monthly Legal Awards 2016 - Winner Joint Ventures Law Firm of the Year

Further information about Teaming Agreements and Joint Ventures

If you need assistance preparing a Teaming Agreement or a Joint Venture, please telephone me for an obligation free and confidential discussion.


Related insights about Teaming Agreements and Joint Ventures

  • Employee share scheme reforms from 1 October 2022

    Employee share scheme reforms from 1 October 2022

    Changes to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (CA) will reduce regulatory requirements and remove barriers for businesses to offer employee share schemes (ESS). This offers cash-poor businesses the potential to attract and retain employees who can benefit from ESS.

    Read more …

  • Director’s right to review company records

    Director’s right to review company records

    As a director, it is important to understand your obligations and rights, including the right to access the company books. Explore this further in this article, which examines the case of Oswal v Burrup Holdings Limited [2011] FCA 609 and the implications of a company refusing a director access.

    Read more …

  • Director identification numbers now a reality

    Director identification numbers now a reality

    The Federal Government has passed a law requiring all directors to obtain a Director Identification Number (DIN). Learn more about the implications of this law, including the potential penalties for non-compliance.

    Read more …

  • Shareholder oppression – a taxonomy of corporate wrongs

    Shareholder oppression – a taxonomy of corporate wrongs

    This article examines the concept of shareholder oppression and provides examples of when the Court has found oppressive conduct, as well as when it has not. It also outlines the remedies the Court prefers when faced with oppressive conduct.

    Read more …

  • Are fiduciary duties owed by former company directors?

    Are fiduciary duties owed by former company directors?

    A former director’s duties and responsibilities to their previous company may not end with their resignation. Find out how the Advanced Fuels Technology Pty Ltd v Blythe & Ors [2018] VSC 286 case explored this concept and what the Court had to say.

    Read more …

  • The legal requirements of crowdfunding in business

    The legal requirements of crowdfunding in business

    Mareva Orders are a tool to protect the proper administration of justice and prevent an abuse of Court processes. The Court can restrain a defendant from disposing of their assets, ensuring the plaintiff has an effective remedy.

    Read more …

  • Director resignations – effects from 18 February 2021

    Director resignations – effects from 18 February 2021

    The Treasury Laws Amendment (Combating Illegal Phoenixing) Act 2020 (Phoenixing Act) introduced major changes to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act), with implications for directors. Learn more about the timeline for director resignations and the potential liabilities of directors under the new law.

    Read more …

  • Shareholder oppression – the early warning signs

    Shareholder oppression – the early warning signs

    This article explores the legal framework of shareholder oppression and identifies early warning signs to look out for when starting a new venture, such as entity type, relationship with advisors, exclusion from management, access to info and non-flexible negotiation.

    Read more …

  • Understanding deal fatigue in business transactions

    Understanding deal fatigue in business transactions

    Learn how to reduce deal fatigue in commercial transactions. Tips include increasing bargaining position, introducing lawyers and planning the deal. Get advice to help you make the most of your next commercial transaction.

    Read more …


Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend