technology lawyer

What exactly is an Initial Coin Offering?

HomePrivate: BlogLegal insightsWhat exactly is an Initial Coin Offering?

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

3–5 minutes

With the rise of cryptocurrencies (think Bitcoin and Ethereum), start-up businesses have engaged in a new method of sourcing funding from would-be investors – Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs).  ICOs are becoming an increasingly popular method for new businesses to raise money in a short period of time with minimal effort.  As ICOs are a new concept utilising new technologies, they are yet to be regulated in Australia.  However, with the rise in popularity of ICOs in Australia, and around the world, whether or not ICOs will be regulated is a question many expected to be answered shortly.

What happens when a company does an ICO?

An ICO is a process whereby a company raises capital through the offering of secured tokens of cryptocurrencies.  According to Wikipedia, a cryptocurrency is:

a digital asset designed to work as a medium of exchange using cryptography to secure the transactions and to control the creation of additional units of the currency”.

These tokens are unique to the corporate issuer, thereby aligning the value of the tokens to the value (being the success) of the company.

Why is an ICO different from an IPO?

While an ICO may sound very similar to an IPO (Initial Public Offering) of shares on a stock exchange, there are fundamental differences that investors must be aware of.  These differences include:

  • Where an IPO entitles the purchaser to an equitable stake in the company (a share), an ICO entitles the purchaser to a cryptocurrency ‘token’ that is linked specifically to the company. Unlike the share, the token does not entitle the holder to any “ownership” rights in the company – such as the right to vote on decisions of the company or a right to receive a share of the profit.
  • Where an IPO requires a company to comply with listing rules of the relevant stock exchange and the corporate laws of the respective country, such as the requirement to prepare detailed disclosure documents (generally summarised in the form of a prospectus), there are no such guidelines for ICOs. With that said, companies undertaking an ICO will usually prepare a brief outline of the business opportunity in a ‘white paper’ in order to provide some overview to investors of the potential of the company. As there are not strict rules regulating ICOs (at this time), white papers will generally be far less detailed than their IPO counterparts.
  • Whereas shares purchased through an IPO entitle the holder to a proportion of the profits of the company (commonly referred to as dividends), holders of tokens from an ICO will not receive such payments. The profit to be made on tokens are from the rise in value of the token which will occur as demand for the token increases (similar to the share price movements from an IPO). In this sense, many consider ICOs to involve a large degree of ‘speculation’; but the same may be said of many micro-cap listings on the ASX.

Regulation of ICO’s in Australia

As ICOs are unlike capital raising methods previously used, it presents many unique scenarios for regulators – is an ICO a financial product capable of being regulated, and if so, what is the best method of regulating it?  Are they in fact equities at all?

In Australia, there is currently no detailed regulation of ICOs. While ASIC does provide some consideration of cryptocurrencies (see ASIC Information Sheet 219)(and ASIC’s MoneySmart Virtual currencies information), ASIC has yet to set out whether or not it will regulate ICOs undertaken in Australia.

While ASIC has not yet provided its view on the regulation of ICOs, ASIC Chairman Mr Greg Medcraft, in a recent interview with CoinDesk, did not close the door on regulating ICOs.  As Mr Medcraft noted, while ICOs may not be equities (within the traditional meaning), they may be considered financial products which may be regulated by ASIC.

ASIC is expected to announce whether it will regulate ICOs shortly.

Links and further references

Australian Securities and Investments Commission

Evaluating Distributed Ledger Technology – Information Sheet 219
Money Smart – Virtual currencies

Further information about financial services licencing

If you need assistance regarding financial services licencing, technology law or you are considering doing an initial coin offering, please telephone me for an obligation free and confidential discussion.


Related insights about financial services licencing

  • Managed service agreements for IT businesses

    Managed service agreements for IT businesses

    A Managed Services Agreement (MSA) outlines the roles and responsibilities of IT services provider and client, detailing services, payment, security, and more. It helps mitigate risks and ensure both parties are clear on expectations.

    Read more …

  • Top 11 legal tips for selling a technology business

    Top 11 legal tips for selling a technology business

    These tips include asset sale or share sale, intellectual property ownership, legal and accounting due diligence, change of control issues, restraint of trade clauses, key personnel, and more.

    Read more …

  • s115A Copyright Act – infringement outside Australia

    s115A Copyright Act – infringement outside Australia

    This article examines the concept of shareholder oppression and provides examples of when the Court has found oppressive conduct, as well as when it has not. It also outlines the remedies the Court prefers when faced with oppressive conduct.

    Read more …

  • Do meta tags amount to trade mark infringement?

    Do meta tags amount to trade mark infringement?

    Find out how the case of Accor Australia & New Zealand Hospitality Pty Ltd v Liv Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 554 highlights the potential risk of trademark infringements to businesses. Read more to discover the case background, takeaways, and tips to protect your business.

    Read more …

  • Electronic document execution by directors

    Electronic document execution by directors

    The Federal Government has issued a ruling allowing companies to sign documents electronically until 6 November 2020. Find out more about how this ruling affects your business.

    Read more …

  • Assigning intellectual property and the right to sue

    Assigning intellectual property and the right to sue

    This case examines Re Taypar Pty Ltd v Benko Santic [1989] FCA 543, which determined that an assignee of intellectual property rights cannot sue for pre-assignment infringements, unless the assignment explicitly assigns a right to do so.

    Read more …

  • Evidence from the Wayback Machine accepted

    Evidence from the Wayback Machine accepted

    Australian Courts are increasingly considering the use of evidence from the Wayback Machine, but questions remain as to whether they will accept such reports in practice and what will be allowed?

    Read more …

  • $750k awarded for fake online reviews

    $750k awarded for fake online reviews

    The Supreme Court of South Australia awarded $A750,000 in damages to a lawyer in the case of Cheng v Lok [2020] SASC 14, demonstrating the serious consequences of posting fake reviews online. Find out more about the implications of this case and alternative legal actions for companies that receive negative reviews.

    Read more …

  • Adaptations and computer code – copyright issues

    Adaptations and computer code – copyright issues

    An adaption in copyright is the exclusive right of the owner of the work in question.  Section 10 of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (Act) defines adaption as it relates to literary works in dramatic and non-dramatic forms, in a computer program and in relation to a musical work.   The rights that apply to adaptions…

    Read more …


Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend