internet law

What does a network access agreement cover?

HomePrivate: BlogLegal insightsWhat does a network access agreement cover?

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Network access agreements are agreements between licenced carriers in which a carrier (First Carrier) gives another carrier (Second Carrier) access to its network, which the Second Carrier can then access to provide telecommunications services to end customers or other wholesale carriers.  Below we set out the key considerations, carriers need to cover in their network access agreements.

Routing

Carriers need freedom to re-route services as required.  It is important for the First Carrier to clearly state that the service does not include redundancy, particular wavelengths, particular equipment, assets or links or particular routing, unless specified in a service order, otherwise the First Carrier could be in breach of the agreement if it re-routes services between the points of interconnect or changes the equipment used to provide the service.   Likewise, carriers should not take on obligations to provide or utilise any specific configuration of assets, links or waveforms, network architecture, technology or related equipment, in providing the network services, unless agreed in a service order.

Faults and interruptions

Network access agreements should clearly provide that the First Carrier is not responsible for rectifying any fault in a service where the fault arises in or is caused by the Second Carrier’s network, equipment or facilities beyond the points of interconnect.

Acceptance testing

Where the network service is subject to acceptance testing, the criteria needs to be clearly set out in the order.  Where the Second Carrier does not give the First Carrier a certificate of acceptance or a notice of failure within a certain period of the service activation date, the agreement should state that the Second Carrier is deemed to have accepted the service.

Suspension

It is important that the First Carrier has the right to suspend its services to the Second Carrier if an upstream supplier terminates or suspends the underlying service.  There are two (2) broad approaches to addressing the risk of an upstream supplier cancelling the underlying service:

  • giving the First Carrier a broad suspension right; and
  • specifying more detailed scenarios where the First Carrier can suspend which more closely reflect upstream supplier’s rights to terminate or suspend.

Pass through charges

It is imperative that the First Carrier has the right to charge the Second Carrier additional amounts to cover events which cause the cost to provide the service increase, such as:

  • additional pass through charges directly imposed by an upstream supplier (including price increases, network extension costs, special and one-off charges);
  • to service, modify, repair or replace a service or any equipment, as a result of the Second Carrier’s breach of the agreement, failure of the Second Carrier’s equipment, or an act or omission of Second Carrier, Second Carrier’s personnel or an end user;
  • for installation or activation, if the information Second Carrier provides to determine the installation required is incomplete or inaccurate; and
  • for installation, maintenance and any other services that Second Carrier requests that the First Carrier provide outside normal business hours.

Network obligations – Second Carrier

The agreement should clearly state that the Second Carrier must ensure that its network and equipment is compatible with the First Carrier’s network and equipment, including all technical requirements set out in the Service Order, otherwise the service will not function properly.

 A prohibition on the Second Carrier Customer installing or connecting any equipment to the First Carrier’s network without first the First Carrier’s express written consent should be clearly stated, otherwise there is a risk that the equipment of the Second Carrier could interrupt, degrade or damage the First Carrier’s network and equipment which can cause service interruption to other carriers and end users.

Indemnity

It is important that the First Carrier is not faced with claims made by third parties against it arising from the acts or omissions of the Second Carrier.  To protect the First Carrier, the agreement should include an indemnity given by the Second Carrier against such claims.  The Second Carrier may request that the First Carrier give a reciprocal indemnity. 

 If the First Carrier considers this, the scope of such indemnity should be to the extent the liabilities of the Second Carrier has to third parties do not exceed the liability of the First Carrier to Second Carrier under the agreement For example, up to the designated cap with certain types of loss excluded, such as loss of profits.

Takeaways

Network access agreements require careful consideration to ensure carriers are not liable for any service interruption caused by upstream carriers or by its carrier customers.  A well-drafted network access agreement can avoid these scenarios and give the First Carrier freedom to re-route and suspend services as required and on-charge any pass-through costs.

Links and further references

Legislation

Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth)

Further information about network access agreements

If you need advice on network access agreements, please feel free to contact me for a confidential and obligation free discussion.


Related insights about technology law

  • e-Signatures – legally binding on companies?

    e-Signatures – legally binding on companies?

    E-signatures are becoming increasingly popular, but are they legally binding? Find out in this article, which examines the Adelaide Bank case and reveals the limitations of e-signatures when it comes to executing a deed. Click through to learn more.

    Read more …

  • New safety standards proposed for online platforms

    New safety standards proposed for online platforms

    The Australian Government has proposed an Online Safety Act that could significantly change the way businesses manage user-generated content online. Find out how this proposed Act could affect your business and how you can prepare for it.

    Read more …

  • Has my software been copied? – legal test explained

    Has my software been copied? – legal test explained

    This article examines the legal test for a “substantial reproduction” of computer code, as established by the High Court in Data Access Corporation v Powerflex Services Pty Ltd [1999] HCA 49 and further discussed in subsequent cases. The Court will consider the essential features of the work to determine if there has been a substantial…

    Read more …

  • Technology startups – top 5 legal considerations

    Technology startups – top 5 legal considerations

    Start your tech startup on the right footing by considering the top five (5) legal considerations: entity structure and asset protection, intellectual property (IP), confidentiality, contracts, privacy and compliance.

    Read more …

  • Legal concerns in software support agreements

    Legal concerns in software support agreements

    Software developers must consider tech and product support services when taking software to market, such as differences between technical and product support, supported and non-supported items, and differences between installed and hosted software support agreements.

    Read more …

  • De-encryption Bill currently before Joint Committee

    De-encryption Bill currently before Joint Committee

    The much awaited Telecommunications and other Legislation Amendment (Assistance And Access) De-encryption Bill 2018 (De-encryption Bill) has been referred to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security (Joint Committee).  The Joint Committee has allowed three (3) weeks for submissions.  It is a very short time-frame for submissions considering the controversial nature of the Bill.…

    Read more …

  • Making financial forecasts – legal pitfalls for business

    Making financial forecasts – legal pitfalls for business

    Organisations must be aware of the legal risks associated with social media use, such as wrongful dismissal, trade mark infringement, and defamation. This article outlines these risks and provides steps to protect against them.

    Read more …

  • De-encryption laws: compelling tech giants to cooperate with law enforcement

    De-encryption laws: compelling tech giants to cooperate with law enforcement

    The Australian Government is introducing encryption-related legislation that could have significant implications. Get the full scoop on what this Bill could mean for companies and citizens before it is officially announced.

    Read more …

  • EU General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) – How to comply

    EU General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) – How to comply

    The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) applies to Australian entities processing personal data of European Union (EU) citizens/residents. It outlines principles, notification obligations, penalties for non-compliance, and requirements for cross-border data transfers.

    Read more …


Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend