Commercial law

The Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth) – explained

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawThe Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth) – explained

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

3–4 minutes

The Australian Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth) (Act) entered into force on 1 January 2019, which established a national Modern Slavery Reporting Requirement (Reporting Requirement) throughout the country.  The Reporting Requirement applies to businesses and entities with annual consolidated revenue of AUD$100 million or more.  The purpose of the Reporting Requirement is to support the Australian business community in addressing and identifying modern slavery risks, as well as maintaining transparent and responsible supply chains.

So just what is modern slavery?

Modern slavery is a term used to describe serious exploitation, which may occur in every industry and sector and has severe consequences for victims. As defined in section 4 of the Act, the following conducts constitute modern slavery:

  • human trafficking;
  • slavery;
  • servitude;
  • forced labour;
  • debt bondage;
  • forced marriage; and
  • the worst forms of child labour.

What responsibilities do businesses have to respect human rights in their operations?

Modern slavery in business practices distorts global markets and undermines responsible business, leading to legal and reputational consequences for entities.  The United Nations Guiding principles on Business and Human Rights provides a framework for businesses and includes guidelines as to how to take steps to asses and address the risks associated with modern slavery.

Modern Slavery Act 2018

Section 3 of the Act requires entities based or operating in Australia, with an annual consolidated revenue of at least AUD$100 million to file an annual report on the risks of modern slavery in their operations and supply chains, as well as on the actions taken in addressing these risks.

Entities that do not meet the threshold of AUD$100 million for mandatory reporting may volunteer to report under section 6 of the Act. Modern slavery statements must be given annually to the Minister.  If an entity fails to comply with its obligations under the Act, the Minister has power to request explanation as to why did it failed to comply with the reporting requirements set out in the Act.

Contents of the modern slavery statements

A modern slavery statement must contain the following pursuant to section 6 of the Act:

  • identifying the reporting entity;
  • describing the structure, operations and supply chains of the reporting entity;
  • describing risks if modern slavery practices in the operations and supply chains of the entity;
  • describing the actions taken to assess and address these risks, including due diligence and remediation processes;
  • describing how the entity assesses the effectiveness of actions taken;
  • describing the process of consultation with entities controlled or owned by the reporting entity;
  • including any information that may be relevant to the reporting entity; and
  • the report must contain the details of approval by the principal governing body of the entity.

How to submit a modern slavery statement

Entities with a mandatory reporting obligation or intending to voluntarily make a statement can upload their statements to the Australian Government’s Online Register for Modern Slavery Statements.  The statements are assessed and reviewed by the ABF, which may result in requiring the entities to revise non-compliant statements.

Modern slavery statements are registered by the Minister in the Online Register for Modern Slavery Statements and the register is made available to the public on the internet pursuant to section 17 of the Act.

Takeaways

Filing a modern slavery statement is only compulsory for entities with  an AUS$100 million annual consolidated revenue.  Businesses with lower annual consolidated revenue may file a statement voluntarily.  Whether an entity should opt in so to speak should be assessed on a case by case basis as the burden in compiling and filing a statement may not be practically viable.

Links and further references

Legislation

United Nations Guiding principles on Business and Human Rights

Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth)

Further information about compliance with the Modern Slavery Act

If you are an Australian organisation and need advice on compliance with the reporting requirements of the Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth), contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights about compliance

  • Drag-along provisions challenged in Mobile Asset Case

    Drag-along provisions challenged in Mobile Asset Case

    The case of Mobile Asset Holdings Ltd [2026] ATP 7 (Mobile Asset Case) concerned a proposed special resolution to insert drag-along and tag-along rights into the company constitution of Mobile Asset Holdings Ltd ACN 614 791 043 (Mobile Asset).[1]  Ultimately, the Australian Takeovers Panel (Panel) decided that Mobile Asset could not hold a general meeting…

    Read more …

  • Breach of duties as oppression – Our Jim & Felicja Superfund v Lindenfels

    Breach of duties as oppression – Our Jim & Felicja Superfund v Lindenfels

    The case of Our Jim & Felicja Superfund Pty Ltd as trustee for the Jim & Felicja Superannuation Fund v Lindenfels Pte Ltd [2026] FCA 307 (Superfund v Lindenfels) is a reminder that shareholder oppression under section 232 of the Corporations Act 2001(Cth) (Corporations Act) must be established on its own terms, particularly where a…

    Read more …

  • What ASIC’s new DIN laws mean for Australian directors

    What ASIC’s new DIN laws mean for Australian directors

    The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has announced that, from 1 July 2027, obligations surrounding director identification numbers (Director IDs) will change.  The amendments to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) which are set to commence will require that companies provide Director IDs to ASIC.  This article will briefly explain the function of…

    Read more …

  • WIJOAV v Goldstone – shareholder oppression in a private equity context

    WIJOAV v Goldstone – shareholder oppression in a private equity context

    The recent case of WIJOAV Services Pty Ltd v Goldstone Private Equity Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 622 (WIJOAV v Goldstone) involved a claim of shareholder oppression under section 232 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act).  The case established that a shareholder in a private equity fund may be oppressed by a co-investor where…

    Read more …

  • Mere puffery vs misleading and deceptive conduct – where is the line?

    Mere puffery vs misleading and deceptive conduct – where is the line?

    In the case of Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54 (ACCC v TPG), the High Court of Australia (High Court) drew a distinction between mere puffery and representations with the intention of marketing.  This article explores the decision in ACCC v TPG and the distinction between puffery and…

    Read more …

  • Federal Court dismisses continuous disclosure claim

    Federal Court dismisses continuous disclosure claim

    The Federal Court recently dismissed Australia Securities and Investment Commission’s (ASIC) claim in Australian Securities and Investment Commission v Nuix Limited [2026] FCA 490 (ASIC v Nuix) that Nuix Limited breached its obligations under section 674 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act).  Nuix Limited (Nuix) successfully contested ASIC’s allegation that it had breached…

    Read more …

  • Individual Flexibility Arrangements: an overview

    Individual Flexibility Arrangements: an overview

    Modern awards and enterprise agreements set out the minimum terms and conditions of employment for most Australian workers performing different roles.  The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act) provides a mechanism by which an employer and an individual employee may, by agreement, adjust the operation of certain terms in their Award to better suit theircircumstances. …

    Read more …

  • Coercive control and shareholder oppression

    Coercive control and shareholder oppression

    The Criminal Law (Coercive Control and Affirmative Consent) and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2024 (Qld) came into effect on 18 March 2024, by adding chapter 29A to the Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld) (Criminal Code).  This chapter establishes a separate offence of “coercive control’, which stems from domestic violence offences and involves the use of…

    Read more …

  • Overview of the Unfair Trading Practices Bill 2026

    Overview of the Unfair Trading Practices Bill 2026

    On 1 April 2026, the Australian Government introduced the Competition and Consumer Amendment (Unfair Trading Practices) Bill 2026 (Cth) (Bill) to amend the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA) and Australian Consumer Law (ACL).[1]  If passed, the reform will take effect on 1 July 2027.  The Bill’s amendments aim to protect consumers from manipulative…

    Read more …


Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend