Commercial law

The Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth) – explained

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawThe Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth) – explained

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

3–4 minutes

The Australian Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth) (Act) entered into force on 1 January 2019, which established a national Modern Slavery Reporting Requirement (Reporting Requirement) throughout the country.  The Reporting Requirement applies to businesses and entities with annual consolidated revenue of AUD$100 million or more.  The purpose of the Reporting Requirement is to support the Australian business community in addressing and identifying modern slavery risks, as well as maintaining transparent and responsible supply chains.

So just what is modern slavery?

Modern slavery is a term used to describe serious exploitation, which may occur in every industry and sector and has severe consequences for victims. As defined in section 4 of the Act, the following conducts constitute modern slavery:

  • human trafficking;
  • slavery;
  • servitude;
  • forced labour;
  • debt bondage;
  • forced marriage; and
  • the worst forms of child labour.

What responsibilities do businesses have to respect human rights in their operations?

Modern slavery in business practices distorts global markets and undermines responsible business, leading to legal and reputational consequences for entities.  The United Nations Guiding principles on Business and Human Rights provides a framework for businesses and includes guidelines as to how to take steps to asses and address the risks associated with modern slavery.

Modern Slavery Act 2018

Section 3 of the Act requires entities based or operating in Australia, with an annual consolidated revenue of at least AUD$100 million to file an annual report on the risks of modern slavery in their operations and supply chains, as well as on the actions taken in addressing these risks.

Entities that do not meet the threshold of AUD$100 million for mandatory reporting may volunteer to report under section 6 of the Act. Modern slavery statements must be given annually to the Minister.  If an entity fails to comply with its obligations under the Act, the Minister has power to request explanation as to why did it failed to comply with the reporting requirements set out in the Act.

Contents of the modern slavery statements

A modern slavery statement must contain the following pursuant to section 6 of the Act:

  • identifying the reporting entity;
  • describing the structure, operations and supply chains of the reporting entity;
  • describing risks if modern slavery practices in the operations and supply chains of the entity;
  • describing the actions taken to assess and address these risks, including due diligence and remediation processes;
  • describing how the entity assesses the effectiveness of actions taken;
  • describing the process of consultation with entities controlled or owned by the reporting entity;
  • including any information that may be relevant to the reporting entity; and
  • the report must contain the details of approval by the principal governing body of the entity.

How to submit a modern slavery statement

Entities with a mandatory reporting obligation or intending to voluntarily make a statement can upload their statements to the Australian Government’s Online Register for Modern Slavery Statements.  The statements are assessed and reviewed by the ABF, which may result in requiring the entities to revise non-compliant statements.

Modern slavery statements are registered by the Minister in the Online Register for Modern Slavery Statements and the register is made available to the public on the internet pursuant to section 17 of the Act.

Takeaways

Filing a modern slavery statement is only compulsory for entities with  an AUS$100 million annual consolidated revenue.  Businesses with lower annual consolidated revenue may file a statement voluntarily.  Whether an entity should opt in so to speak should be assessed on a case by case basis as the burden in compiling and filing a statement may not be practically viable.

Links and further references

Legislation

United Nations Guiding principles on Business and Human Rights

Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth)

Further information about compliance with the Modern Slavery Act

If you are an Australian organisation and need advice on compliance with the reporting requirements of the Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth), contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights about compliance

  • Does your start-up meet the ESIC tax-offset criteria?

    Does your start-up meet the ESIC tax-offset criteria?

    Federal government introduced the Tax Laws Amendment (Tax Incentives for Innovation) Act 2016 (Cth) to provide tax incentives for investors in an eligible early stage innovation company (ESIC), including 20% up-front non-refundable tax offset and capital gains tax (CGT) exemption for all types of investors meeting criteria.

    Read more …

  • White-Anting: An employer’s lawful termination guide

    White-Anting: An employer’s lawful termination guide

    Employees who use White Anting tactics to deliberately undermine management or disrupt workplace harmony may be summarily dismissed, provided the relevant legal conditions are met and a proper process is followed.  Following our 28 April 2026 article “White Anting: serious misconduct?“, this article provides practical “how to” steps for employers to lawfully dismiss employees who…

    Read more …

  • White Anting: serious misconduct?

    White Anting: serious misconduct?

    White Anting is an Australian term meaning to sabotage, undermine, or destroy an organisation, project, or person from within.  White Anting in the workplace often involves the quiet, insidious undermining of a colleague or superior through gossip, withholding information, exclusion, or spreading doubt.  White Anting  has been recognised by psychologists as a psychosocial hazard and…

    Read more …

  • ACCC publishes guidance on cash acceptance industry codes

    ACCC publishes guidance on cash acceptance industry codes

    From 1 January 2026, new cash acceptance obligations have commenced under industry codes applying to supermarkets and fuel retailers, overseen by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC).  In March 2026, the ACCC published guidance on these newly enforced regulations, reminding retailers to consider their obligations before penalties apply on 1 July 2026.

    Read more …

  • ESS vs ESOP – what’s the difference?

    ESS vs ESOP – what’s the difference?

    Employee share schemes (ESS) and employee share option plans (ESOP) are commonly used by corporations to incentivise employees and align performance with company growth by providing them with an interest in the company.  While the terms are often used interchangeably, they have distinct legal and structural differences under Australian law.  This article explains the key…

    Read more …

  • Disputed ESOP – Selak v National Tiles Co Pty Ltd

    Disputed ESOP – Selak v National Tiles Co Pty Ltd

    In the case of Selak v National Tiles, the Vic Supreme Court considered whether a company breached an option agreement governed by the terms of an Employee Share Option Plan (ESOP) by requiring an option holder to execute an undisclosed shareholders’ agreement as a condition of exercising vested options.  

    Read more …

  • Bill to allow victims of AI deepfakes to sue for emotional damages

    Bill to allow victims of AI deepfakes to sue for emotional damages

    On 24 November 2025, Senator David Pocock introduced a private Senator’s bill, the Online Safety and Other Legislation Amendment (My Face, My Rights) Bill 2025 (Cth) (Bill) to amend the Online Safety Act 2021 (Cth) (Online Safety Act) and the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) (Privacy Act). 

    Read more …

  • Can a unit trust be wound up by the oppression remedies

    Can a unit trust be wound up by the oppression remedies

    The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corps Act) grants the Courts the power to award remedies under section 233, specifically designed to address situations of oppression within corporate entities under section 232.  These remedies, also known as the “Oppression Remedies”, aim to resolve situations where a company’s conduct unfairly prejudices its members or shareholders.  While primarily…

    Read more …

  • Business Lawyer

    Business Lawyer

    Business Lawyer, commercial and contracts and advisory lawyer, 4-10 years PAE, and $ negotiable performance based, depending on experience.

    Read more …


Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend