With the recent crackdown by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) on unfair contract terms in online contracts, the question whether website operators terms and conditions are contractually binding has risen again. This is commonly referred to as the click wrap vs browse wrap debate.
Despite the paucity of Australian case law on this issue, the case of eBay International AG v Creative Festival Entertainment Pty Limited (ACN 098 183 281) [2006] FCA 1768 (18 December 2006) (eBay) provides guidance on how a court is likely to determine whether or not the terms and conditions on a website will form a binding contract.
In eBay, the question for determination was whether the operator of the website (Creative) had engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct by including a condition that tickets resold via online auction sites could be cancelled if onsold. The Court held that the relevant conditions “conveyed a misleading representation that the seller is legally entitled to and would detect and cancel any ticket which is resold for profit and the holder of that ticket would be refused entry to the event“.
What was the Court’s reasoning?
In arriving at the conclusion that it did, the Rares J cited various cases which were authority for the principle that the parties cannot rely on the terms and conditions of contract unless at the time the contract was made, the issuer did “all that was reasonably necessary to bring the terms to the other party’s attention“. In case this it was held to be misleading and deceptive to purport to rely on conditions which were not adequately brought to the attention of purchasers.
This case highlights the importance of getting the basics right in preparing online contracts particularly in light of the consumer protection provisions contained in the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth).
Further information
If your business needs more information about online contracts, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Disclaimer
This article contains general commentary only. You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice. Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstances.
Related insights about online law
-
What are Software Development Agreements?
Having a Software Development Agreement (SDA) is essential for any successful software development project. Learn more about the key clauses involved and how to avoid potential issues.
-
Legal risks in the in-app purchase model
Software developers and publishers are offering users the chance to make In-App Purchases within their software, but there are legal risks involved. Learn how to protect yourself and your business by understanding the requirements of distribution platforms and Australian consumer law.
-
App developers – take care with Apple Developer License
Creating apps for Apple devices requires adherence to Apple’s Developer Agreement, Program Licence Agreement, and App Store Review Guidelines. Learn about your rights and obligations when it comes to agreeing to Apple’s terms and conditions, and the consequences of ignoring them.
-
Data security – the increasing burden
The consequences for an Australian business victim for a breach of cyber security are forecast to exponentially increase. In February 2015 the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security (Committee) recommended the introduction of mandatory data breach notification scheme (Scheme) by the end of 2015.[1] Whilst the details of the incoming Scheme are currently scant,…
-
Proposed anti-bullying laws to target social media platforms
The Federal Government is introducing legislation to protect children from online bullying on social media. Find out more about the powers the Children’s e-Safety Commissioner will have to address this issue.
-
Cupid Media risks privacy of the dateless
The Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) (Privacy Act) requires entities to take reasonable steps to secure personal information.
