Employers need to take care when making changes to an employee’s contract of employment as it may give rise to allegations of constructive dismissal.
Section 386(1)(b) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) provides that a person has been dismissed if they were forced to resign from their employment because of conduct, or a course of conduct, by their employer. This is commonly known as constructive dismissal.
The Act reflects the common law concept of constructive dismissal, allowing for a finding that an employee was dismissed in situations where:
- The employer expressly asks the employee to resign or face a threatened or impending dismissal, or;
- The employer’s conduct may leave the employee feeling that he or she has no reasonable choice but to resign.
View on Dundas Lawyers Youtube Channel – Constructive Dismissal
Examples of conduct which could give rise to constructive dismissal
Importantly the definition of “conduct” includes both an act and a failure to act. Unacceptable conduct of the employer may be an unauthorised variation to employment conditions, such as:
- Repeated failure to pay wages;
- A pay-cut;
- Demotion;
- Change of working hours;
- Relocation; or
- Reducing the responsibilities and duties of an employee who returned from maternity leave.
It may also be unacceptable personal treatment of the employee such as:
- Harassment by a fellow worker that the employer has unreasonably failed to prevent or punish; or
- Continued failure to investigate allegations of bullying or to take appropriate steps to protect the employee from the bullying.
Not a separate legal claim
Constructive dismissal is not a separate claim, but is an argument put as part of an unfair dismissal or a general protections (adverse action) claim.
In lodging a claim, an employee must prove on the balance of probabilities that he or she did not leave their employment voluntarily but rather was forced to leave because of the employer’s conduct.
It is a high threshold to prove the employer’s conduct fundamentally damaged the employment relationship to the extent that what the employer did, or failed to do, left the employee with no other option but to resign.
Importantly, the employer’s conduct must involve a significant breach of the employment contract and must be the principal contributing factor leading to the employee’s resignation.
In summary, constructive dismissal cases are rarely straight-forward with each case assessed on its own facts. It is recommended that employers and employees alike seek legal advice whether submitting or defending a claim.
Links and further references
Cases
Australian Hearing v Peary (2009) 185 IR 359
O’Meara v Stanley Works Pty Ltd [2006] AIRCFB PR973462 (11 August 2006)
Mohazbad v Dick Smith Electronics [1995] IRCA 272
Legislation
Further information
If you are an employer or a senior executive and need any assistance regarding a constructive dismissal claim, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Disclaimer
This article contains general commentary only. You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice. Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstance.
Related insights about employment law for employers
-
Individual Flexibility Arrangements: an overview
Modern awards and enterprise agreements set out the minimum terms and conditions of employment for most Australian workers performing different roles. The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act) provides a mechanism by which an employer and an individual employee may, by agreement, adjust the operation of certain terms in their Award to better suit theircircumstances. …
-
White-Anting: An employer’s lawful termination guide
Employees who use White Anting tactics to deliberately undermine management or disrupt workplace harmony may be summarily dismissed, provided the relevant legal conditions are met and a proper process is followed. Following our 28 April 2026 article “White Anting: serious misconduct?“, this article provides practical “how to” steps for employers to lawfully dismiss employees who…
-
White Anting: serious misconduct?
White Anting is an Australian term meaning to sabotage, undermine, or destroy an organisation, project, or person from within. White Anting in the workplace often involves the quiet, insidious undermining of a colleague or superior through gossip, withholding information, exclusion, or spreading doubt. White Anting has been recognised by psychologists as a psychosocial hazard and…
-
The “right to disconnect” from modern workplaces
The right to disconnect, as contained in Part 8 of the Fair Work Amendment (Closing Loopholes No. 2) Bill (Bill), gives employees the right to refuse contact from their employers (or related parties) outside of their working hours, unless the refusal is unreasonable. The changes in Part 8 amend various sections of the Fair Work…
-
Paid family and domestic violence leave for small businesses
The Fair Work Amendment (Paid Family and Domestic Violence Leave) Act 2022 (Cth) (Amending Act) provides that employers must provide 10 days paid leave to all employees. Part-time and casuals also eligible. Confidentiality and ability to take leave in single and separate periods must be respected.
-
Pay secrecy laws come into effect
The Fair Work Legislation Amendment Act 2022 (Cth) has been passed, introducing workplace laws and changing existing rules. Employers must now ensure job ads include minimum wage info and protect confidential info when determining pay. This article provides an overview of the implications.
-
Employers now required to provide paid domestic violence leave
The Federal Government has proposed a bill that provides eligible employees with paid family and domestic violence leave. Find out more about the proposed changes and how they could affect your business.
-
Ex-employees and intellectual property protection
Ex-employees can be a threat to a company’s intellectual property, but with the right contractual clauses, employers can protect their trademarks, copyright, patent, and design. Learn more about how to safeguard your company’s intellectual property.
-
Cost awards in unfair dismissal cases – part 4
This article examines the rare but possible situation in which an employee could be liable to pay the employer’s costs in an Application under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). Find out more about this situation and the case of Ewan Chapman v Ignis Labs Pty Ltd t/a Ignis Labs [2021] FWCFB 932.
