Employment law for employers

Changes affecting unfair dismissal and minimum wage

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawEmployment law for employersChanges affecting unfair dismissal and minimum wage

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

2–3 minutes

On 1 July 2016 three (3) significant changes to employment law came into effect:

  • the unfair dismissal high income threshold increased;
  • the maximum compensation for unfair dismissal claims increased; and
  • the minimum wage increased.

Employers need to be aware of these changes as they impact the rights of both current and future employees of a business.

Increase to high income threshold

An employee is protected from unfair dismissal under section 382 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act) if:

  • the person is an employee who has completed a period of employment with his or her employer of at least the minimum employment period; and
  • either:
    • a modern award covers the person;
    • an enterprise agreement applies to the person in relation to the employment; or
    • the employee’s earnings are less than the high income threshold.

The definition of “high income threshold” in section 333 of the Act, which relies on the calculation method stated in the Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth), was updated on 1 July 2016 from $136,700 to $138,900.  This means that more employees will have access to the unfair dismissal remedy.

Increase to maximum compensation

If it is satisfied that an employee has been unfairly dismissed, the Fair Work Commission (FWC), under section 390 of the Act, can order either:

  • that an employee be reinstated; or
  • if reinstatement is inappropriate, that the employee be compensated.

Pursuant to section 392(5) of the Act, the amount of compensation ordered must not exceed the “compensation cap”.  On 1 July 2016 this cap increased from $68,350 to $69,450.  This increase means that employees who have been unfairly dismissed may now be better compensated when reinstatement is not appropriate.

Increase of minimum wage

Section 282 of the Act provides for the Minimum Wage Panel to set and vary minimum wages for “national system employees” (employees not covered by an award or enterprise agreement).  On 1 July 2016 the national minimum wage was increased to $672.70 per 38 hour working week ($17.70 per hour).  This increase benefits the nation’s lowest paid employees, but was strongly opposed by many employers, especially retailers, who argued that the increase may cause them to cut their employee’s hours or prevent them from hiring new staff.

Takeaways for employers

When drafting employment contracts, employers must ensure that all national system employees receive the increased minimum wage, and must be conscious that employees who earn under the new high income threshold will have access to the unfair dismissal remedy.  Employers must also be aware of their liability to pay increased compensation if an employee is unfairly dismissed.

Links and further references

Legislation

Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)

Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth)

Further information about employment law

If you are an employer who needs assistance drafting employment contracts or advice on another area of employment law, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights about employment law

  • Cost awards in unfair dismissal cases – part 4

    Cost awards in unfair dismissal cases – part 4

    This article examines the rare but possible situation in which an employee could be liable to pay the employer’s costs in an Application under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). Find out more about this situation and the case of Ewan Chapman v Ignis Labs Pty Ltd t/a Ignis Labs [2021] FWCFB 932.

    Read more …

  • Cost awards in unfair dismissal cases – part 3

    Cost awards in unfair dismissal cases – part 3

    This article looks at when costs orders can be imposed on a party to an unfair dismissal application, with an example of how costs orders can be imposed on a complainant employee.

    Read more …

  • Cost awards in unfair dismissal cases – part 2

    Cost awards in unfair dismissal cases – part 2

    The case of Clair Petersen v Kizuri Capital Pty Ltd, Maycorp Pty Ltd and Cricklewood Capital Pty Ltd T/A Allpet Products [2021] FWC 526 highlights the importance of parties engaging meaningfully and reasonably throughout the unfair dismissal process. A costs order was made against an employer who ignored settlement offers, demonstrating that such behaviour can…

    Read more …

  • Changes for casual employment – employer’s responsibilites

    Changes for casual employment – employer’s responsibilites

    The Fair Work Amendment Act 2021 (Cth) has changed the landscape of employment for casual employees. Employers need to be aware of the amended definition of casual employees, the “casual conversion” option and the requirement to provide a Casual Employment Information Statement (CEIS).

    Read more …

  • Who is an “officer” in business dealings?

    Who is an “officer” in business dealings?

    The High Court’s decision in Deputy Commissioner v Huang [2021] HCA 43 confirms the Federal Court may make worldwide asset freezing orders. This is an important development in Australian law.

    Read more …

  • Standing down employees – when can it be done?

    Standing down employees – when can it be done?

    This article provides an overview of the legal framework around standing down employees without pay. It examines the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and relevant case law, and emphasises the importance of consulting with employees and exploring alternative arrangements.

    Read more …

  • New Fair Work information statement

    New Fair Work information statement

    In December 2019, the Fair Work Ombudsman updated the Fair Work Information Statement (FWIS).  The new FWIS sets out information for businesses about the conditions of employment for new employees.  Businesses must issue a copy of the FWIS to all new employees before, or as soon as possible after, they commence employment.  This article discusses…

    Read more …

  • Know-how vs confidential information

    Know-how vs confidential information

    Understand the difference between “know-how” and confidential information when it comes to employer-employee relationships. Find out how to protect confidential trade secrets and use broad contractual terms to ensure protection. Click through to get the full details.

    Read more …

  • The doctrine of repudiation – when deals go bad

    The doctrine of repudiation – when deals go bad

    Contracting in business can be tricky, but the doctrine of repudiation may provide a way to end a contract and seek compensation. Learn more about this complex topic.

    Read more …

Send this to a friend