On 1 July 2016 three (3) significant changes to employment law came into effect:
- the unfair dismissal high income threshold increased;
- the maximum compensation for unfair dismissal claims increased; and
- the minimum wage increased.
Employers need to be aware of these changes as they impact the rights of both current and future employees of a business.
Increase to high income threshold
An employee is protected from unfair dismissal under section 382 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act) if:
- the person is an employee who has completed a period of employment with his or her employer of at least the minimum employment period; and
- either:
- a modern award covers the person;
- an enterprise agreement applies to the person in relation to the employment; or
- the employee’s earnings are less than the high income threshold.
The definition of “high income threshold” in section 333 of the Act, which relies on the calculation method stated in the Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth), was updated on 1 July 2016 from $136,700 to $138,900. This means that more employees will have access to the unfair dismissal remedy.
Increase to maximum compensation
If it is satisfied that an employee has been unfairly dismissed, the Fair Work Commission (FWC), under section 390 of the Act, can order either:
- that an employee be reinstated; or
- if reinstatement is inappropriate, that the employee be compensated.
Pursuant to section 392(5) of the Act, the amount of compensation ordered must not exceed the “compensation cap”. On 1 July 2016 this cap increased from $68,350 to $69,450. This increase means that employees who have been unfairly dismissed may now be better compensated when reinstatement is not appropriate.
Increase of minimum wage
Section 282 of the Act provides for the Minimum Wage Panel to set and vary minimum wages for “national system employees” (employees not covered by an award or enterprise agreement). On 1 July 2016 the national minimum wage was increased to $672.70 per 38 hour working week ($17.70 per hour). This increase benefits the nation’s lowest paid employees, but was strongly opposed by many employers, especially retailers, who argued that the increase may cause them to cut their employee’s hours or prevent them from hiring new staff.
Takeaways for employers
When drafting employment contracts, employers must ensure that all national system employees receive the increased minimum wage, and must be conscious that employees who earn under the new high income threshold will have access to the unfair dismissal remedy. Employers must also be aware of their liability to pay increased compensation if an employee is unfairly dismissed.
Links and further references
Legislation
Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth)
Further information about employment law
If you are an employer who needs assistance drafting employment contracts or advice on another area of employment law, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Disclaimer
This article contains general commentary only. You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice. Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstances.
Related insights about employment law
-
Bullying in the workplace by a body corporate
This investigation reveals the legal implications of workplace bullying in a body corporate. Find out what the Obligations of Reasonableness and the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) mean for workers and how to apply for an order to stop the bullying.
-
What’s an unfair preference claim?
Understand the implications of unsecured debts, insolvent transactions, and unfair preference claims in the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Discover the defences available to protect against unfair preference claims and other related legal matters.
-
Shadow directors and de facto directors explained
This article examines the legal reality of de facto directors and shadow directors, which go beyond those validly appointed. It also considers whether advisory board members can be classed as such, and the implications of this status, with reference to relevant case law.
-
Contracting with Minors – is it even possible?
In the innovation economy it is becoming more prevalent for individuals aged less than eighteen (18) years (Minors) to seek to build enterprises. From time to time we are asked to consider whether a client can contract with a Minor. The law in Australia[1] and Queensland[2] states that a Minor is someone who has yet…
-
Changes affecting unfair dismissal and minimum wage
Employers should be aware of three changes to employment law that came into effect on 1 July 2016, which have a significant impact on employee rights, including the unfair dismissal high income threshold, maximum compensation for claims, and minimum wage.
-
Terminating a contract with no set end date
In practice, we come across commercial agreements of varying types (Contracts) that, for whatever reason, don’t provide for a term or an end date (Expiry Date). There may have been reasons for this at the time that can no longer be recalled. It raises a number of issues, particularly where the subject matter of the…
-
Letting go of employees threatening to go to the media
When employees leak confidential information or threaten to go to the media, employers can face serious consequences. Find out what the Fair Work Commission says about this issue and what options employers have to protect themselves.
-
Can employers dismiss employees for failing to follow instructions?
When an employee fails to follow their employer’s instructions, the consequences can be serious. Learn about the steps employers must take before termination, and how to protect against unfair dismissal claims.
-
Terminating an employee for serious misconduct
These tips include asset sale or share sale, intellectual property ownership, legal and accounting due diligence, change of control issues, restraint of trade clauses, key personnel, and more.
