Corporate law Brisbane

Director identification numbers now a reality

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawCorporate lawDirector identification numbers now a reality

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

In June 2020, the Federal Government passed the Treasury Laws Amendment (Registries modernisation and other measures) Act 2020 (No.69, 2020) – Schedule 2 (Act) which introduced the requirement for every director to obtain a Director Identification Number (DIN).  A DIN is a unique 15-digit identification number given to each director.   A director must only apply for a DIN once and will keep the number even if they stop being a director, change company, are the director of multiple companies or move interstate or overseas.  The purpose of a DIN is to allow for data collection to monitor director registrations and detect disqualified or fraudulent directors.  

What sections were added to the Act regarding DINs?

The Act inserted Part 9.1A to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) and Part 6-7A of the Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Act 2006 (Corp Act) which incorporates the requirements to obtain a DIN and offences for failing to do so.

Sections 1272A-H of the Corporations Act provide information relating to infringement, misrepresentation, requirements, eligible officers, and application periods.  Part 6-7A of the Corp Act contains similar provisions.

When must Directors have a DIN?

A DIN is mandatory for all directors and alternate directors.  The date when a DIN is required will depend on the date that the person became a director.

Date of directorshipDIN application deadline
On or before 31 October 2021By 30 November 2022
Between 1 November 2021 and 4 April 2022Within 28 days of appointment as a director
From 5 April 2022Before appointment as a director

If directors do not obtain a DIN within the required timeframe or if directed by the Registrar to do so, there are civil and criminal penalties that may apply.  The Registrar may also issue an infringement notice.

How to apply for a DIN

There is no fee to apply for a DIN.   Applications will be available from November 2021 through the electronic platform provided by the Registrar at ABRS.  A director must first have a myGovID before starting the application process.  It is a requirement that a director apply for themselves to verify their identity.  However, if the Registrar is satisfied that the director is unable to make the application themselves, it may be made on their behalf.

What do directors need to provide?

The Registrar may request the following documents for identity verification purposes when applying for a DIN:

  • names and former names;
  • addresses and former addresses;
  • contact details;
  • date and place of birth; and
  • tax file number.

When making an application, the director must make a declaration that:

  • they are the applicant identified in the application;
  • the information provided is true and correct;
  • the individual is an eligible officer, or intends to become an eligible officer within twelve (12) months of applying for a DIN; and
  • the individual does not already have a DIN, or the individual has been directed by the Registrar to apply, or apply again, for a DIN.

Links and further references

Legislation

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)

Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Act 2006

Treasury Laws Amendment (Registries modernisation and other measure) Act 2020 (No.69, 2020) – Schedule 2

Other sources

Australian Business Registry Service

Further information about Director Identification Numbers

If you need advice in relation to the new laws regarding Director Identification Numbers, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights about Director Identification Numbers

  • Do meta tags amount to trade mark infringement?

    Do meta tags amount to trade mark infringement?

    Find out how the case of Accor Australia & New Zealand Hospitality Pty Ltd v Liv Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 554 highlights the potential risk of trademark infringements to businesses. Read more to discover the case background, takeaways, and tips to protect your business.

    Read more …

  • What exactly is a section 293 direction?

    What exactly is a section 293 direction?

    There are several reasons why a shareholder may require financial information, primarily they are denied access to the ‘accounts’ so as to make informed decision about the company.  The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act) provides various mechanisms for shareholders to obtain financial and accounting information about a company, to allow them to access full and…

    Read more …

  • Director’s misuse of funds held to be oppressive

    Director’s misuse of funds held to be oppressive

    This article explores shareholder oppression, examining Section 232 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and Martin v Australian Squash Club Pty Ltd (1996) 14 ACLC 452, to understand the cumulative effect of individual acts.

    Read more …

  • Electronic document execution by directors

    Electronic document execution by directors

    The Federal Government has issued a ruling allowing companies to sign documents electronically until 6 November 2020. Find out more about how this ruling affects your business.

    Read more …

  • Assigning intellectual property and the right to sue

    Assigning intellectual property and the right to sue

    This case examines Re Taypar Pty Ltd v Benko Santic [1989] FCA 543, which determined that an assignee of intellectual property rights cannot sue for pre-assignment infringements, unless the assignment explicitly assigns a right to do so.

    Read more …

  • Evidence from the Wayback Machine accepted

    Evidence from the Wayback Machine accepted

    Australian Courts are increasingly considering the use of evidence from the Wayback Machine, but questions remain as to whether they will accept such reports in practice and what will be allowed?

    Read more …

  • $750k awarded for fake online reviews

    $750k awarded for fake online reviews

    The Supreme Court of South Australia awarded $A750,000 in damages to a lawyer in the case of Cheng v Lok [2020] SASC 14, demonstrating the serious consequences of posting fake reviews online. Find out more about the implications of this case and alternative legal actions for companies that receive negative reviews.

    Read more …

  • Adaptations and computer code – copyright issues

    Adaptations and computer code – copyright issues

    An adaption in copyright is the exclusive right of the owner of the work in question.  Section 10 of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (Act) defines adaption as it relates to literary works in dramatic and non-dramatic forms, in a computer program and in relation to a musical work.   The rights that apply to adaptions…

    Read more …

  • What are sophisticated investors?

    What are sophisticated investors?

    This article provides an overview of the requirements for a person to be a sophisticated investor under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and the Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth). It covers the definition of ‘person’, the Assets Test and Income Test, Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) guidance, and the complexities of self-managed super funds.

    Read more …


Posted

in

, ,
Send this to a friend