Corporate law Brisbane

Director identification numbers now a reality

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawCorporate lawDirector identification numbers now a reality

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

In June 2020, the Federal Government passed the Treasury Laws Amendment (Registries modernisation and other measures) Act 2020 (No.69, 2020) – Schedule 2 (Act) which introduced the requirement for every director to obtain a Director Identification Number (DIN).  A DIN is a unique 15-digit identification number given to each director.   A director must only apply for a DIN once and will keep the number even if they stop being a director, change company, are the director of multiple companies or move interstate or overseas.  The purpose of a DIN is to allow for data collection to monitor director registrations and detect disqualified or fraudulent directors.  

What sections were added to the Act regarding DINs?

The Act inserted Part 9.1A to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) and Part 6-7A of the Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Act 2006 (Corp Act) which incorporates the requirements to obtain a DIN and offences for failing to do so.

Sections 1272A-H of the Corporations Act provide information relating to infringement, misrepresentation, requirements, eligible officers, and application periods.  Part 6-7A of the Corp Act contains similar provisions.

When must Directors have a DIN?

A DIN is mandatory for all directors and alternate directors.  The date when a DIN is required will depend on the date that the person became a director.

Date of directorshipDIN application deadline
On or before 31 October 2021By 30 November 2022
Between 1 November 2021 and 4 April 2022Within 28 days of appointment as a director
From 5 April 2022Before appointment as a director

If directors do not obtain a DIN within the required timeframe or if directed by the Registrar to do so, there are civil and criminal penalties that may apply.  The Registrar may also issue an infringement notice.

How to apply for a DIN

There is no fee to apply for a DIN.   Applications will be available from November 2021 through the electronic platform provided by the Registrar at ABRS.  A director must first have a myGovID before starting the application process.  It is a requirement that a director apply for themselves to verify their identity.  However, if the Registrar is satisfied that the director is unable to make the application themselves, it may be made on their behalf.

What do directors need to provide?

The Registrar may request the following documents for identity verification purposes when applying for a DIN:

  • names and former names;
  • addresses and former addresses;
  • contact details;
  • date and place of birth; and
  • tax file number.

When making an application, the director must make a declaration that:

  • they are the applicant identified in the application;
  • the information provided is true and correct;
  • the individual is an eligible officer, or intends to become an eligible officer within twelve (12) months of applying for a DIN; and
  • the individual does not already have a DIN, or the individual has been directed by the Registrar to apply, or apply again, for a DIN.

Links and further references

Legislation

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)

Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Act 2006

Treasury Laws Amendment (Registries modernisation and other measure) Act 2020 (No.69, 2020) – Schedule 2

Other sources

Australian Business Registry Service

Further information about Director Identification Numbers

If you need advice in relation to the new laws regarding Director Identification Numbers, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights about Director Identification Numbers

  • Computer code libraries and copyright ownership

    Computer code libraries and copyright ownership

    The Australian case of Redrock Holdings Pty Ltd and Hotline Communications Ltd v Hinkley [2001] VSC 91 has shed light on how the ownership of copyright in code libraries is determined. Learn more about the dispute and its implications for copyright ownership in this blog post.

    Read more …

  • e-Signatures – legally binding on companies?

    e-Signatures – legally binding on companies?

    E-signatures are becoming increasingly popular, but are they legally binding? Find out in this article, which examines the Adelaide Bank case and reveals the limitations of e-signatures when it comes to executing a deed. Click through to learn more.

    Read more …

  • New safety standards proposed for online platforms

    New safety standards proposed for online platforms

    The Australian Government has proposed an Online Safety Act that could significantly change the way businesses manage user-generated content online. Find out how this proposed Act could affect your business and how you can prepare for it.

    Read more …

  • Has my software been copied? – legal test explained

    Has my software been copied? – legal test explained

    This article examines the legal test for a “substantial reproduction” of computer code, as established by the High Court in Data Access Corporation v Powerflex Services Pty Ltd [1999] HCA 49 and further discussed in subsequent cases. The Court will consider the essential features of the work to determine if there has been a substantial…

    Read more …

  • Company funds must be used for company purposes

    Company funds must be used for company purposes

    This article examines the legal principles behind when it is permissible to use company funds, focusing on the case of Re D G Brims and Sons Pty Ltd (1995) 16 ASCR 559, which established that company funds must only be used for company purposes and not to pay for legal costs of proceedings for the…

    Read more …

  • The running account defence to unfair preference claims

    The running account defence to unfair preference claims

    Creditors who have been paid by a customer on credit may find themselves facing an Unfair Preference claim letter from a liquidator. Learn more about the defences available to creditors and how to protect yourself from repaying more than your fair share.

    Read more …

  • Unfair preferences & the set-off defence

    Unfair preferences & the set-off defence

    Under section 588FA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act) an unfair preference is defined as a transaction, such as payment of an outstanding debt, between a company and an unsecured creditor which results in that unsecured creditor receiving more than it would have received if it had to prove in the winding up of the…

    Read more …

  • Technology startups – top 5 legal considerations

    Technology startups – top 5 legal considerations

    Start your tech startup on the right footing by considering the top five (5) legal considerations: entity structure and asset protection, intellectual property (IP), confidentiality, contracts, privacy and compliance.

    Read more …

  • Legal concerns in software support agreements

    Legal concerns in software support agreements

    Software developers must consider tech and product support services when taking software to market, such as differences between technical and product support, supported and non-supported items, and differences between installed and hosted software support agreements.

    Read more …


Posted

in

, ,
Send this to a friend