employment law

Productivity Commission publish report on the Workplace Relations Framework

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawEmployment law for employersProductivity Commission publish report on the Workplace Relations Framework

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

1–2 minutes

The Productivity Commission (Commission) has released its draft report (Report) on the workplace relations framework.

In December 2014 the federal government requested the Commission to undertake an inquiry into the workplace relations framework, with the Commission releasing an issues paper on 22 January 2015.

Amongst the issues addressed in the Report are the fiercely debated changes to penalty rates for hospitality and retail workers and the future of minimum wages.  Other recommendations include the introduction of the “Enterprise Contract” which aims to assist small businesses in varying the award of its employees and a host of changes to the unfair dismissal regime.

In the release, the Commission reports that the current workplace relations framework is not dysfunctional and the identified deficiencies can be addressed through repair rather than replacement.  The Commission recommends, amongst other things:

  • the retention of minimum wages and the introduction of complimentary policies rather than any increases to the minimum wage;
  • the reduction of Sunday penalty rates for the hospitality, entertainment and retail industries to align with Saturday rates;
  • changes to the penalty regime for unfair dismissal and the removal of the emphasis on reinstatement in unfair dismissal cases;
  • changes to procedural aspects of the general protections regime and a cap on compensation payable in general protections cases;
  • a recalibration of the test for sham contracting to limit the circumstances where an employer can “escape” prosecution for sham contracting;
  • the introduction of a “no-disadvantage” test to replace the better of overall test for enterprise bargaining; and
  • institutional reform of the Fair Work Commission;

The Commission is inviting public comment on the Report up until 18 September 2015 with the final report due by the end of November 2015.  The Report can be viewed in its entirety at the Commission’s website.

Further information

If you would like further information or advice on employment and industrial relations law, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion: 

Disclaimer

This article contains general commentary only.  You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice.  Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstances.


Related insights about employment law for employers

  • Electronic service of legal documents

    Electronic service of legal documents

    The decision in Conveyor & General Engineering Pty Ltd v Basetec Services Pty Ltd [2014] QSC 30 examined validity of service of documents via email and Dropbox. Find out judgement and “take-aways” to help navigate complex legal process of document service.

    Read more …

  • Enterprise agreements – key considerations for employers

    Enterprise agreements – key considerations for employers

    Enterprise bargaining is an intricate process. The key obligations of employers, from notification to voting, lodging, and approval, are explained. This article examines pre-bargaining, union representation, and good faith bargaining, as well as relevant cases and legislation.

    Read more …

  • Why employers must follow correct processes

    Why employers must follow correct processes

    Employers may be surprised to learn that a valid dismissal can still be deemed unfair by the Fair Work Commission if procedural fairness and natural justice requirements weren’t met.

    Read more …

  • Restraint of trade & commercial contracts – a systemic approach

    Restraint of trade & commercial contracts – a systemic approach

    This article provides an invaluable overview of restraint of trade clauses (ROTs). It examines the enforceability of ROTs, their test of reasonableness, and the role of the Court in determining their reasonableness, providing a valuable guide for those wishing to draft and enforce them.

    Read more …

  • New anti-bullying legislation

    New anti-bullying legislation

    The Fair Work Amendment Bill 2013 (Cth) was passed, introducing anti-bullying measures to protect workers. Employers must take steps to prevent bullying and face fines for contravening orders.

    Read more …

  • Superannuation changes – are you prepared?

    Superannuation changes – are you prepared?

    The Australian Government has introduced significant changes to superannuation, with gradual increases in the compulsory superannuation rate set to impact both employers and employees. Starting in July 2013, employers will be required to contribute more to their employees’ superannuation funds, with the rate rising to 12% by 2019. This article breaks down the key changes,…

    Read more …

  • Employee Share Scheme (ESS) offering through options

    Employee Share Scheme (ESS) offering through options

    Offering employees shares or options to acquire securities can be a great way to reward, retain, and entice them. Discover the different types of employee share schemes, their associated tax implications, the reporting and withholding obligations employers must satisfy.

    Read more …

  • Federal Court implies a new duty in employment contracts

    Federal Court implies a new duty in employment contracts

    The landmark Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker [2014] HCA 32 ruling has changed the way employers must manage their employees. Find out how this Federal Court decision could affect your business and what you need to do to ensure compliance.

    Read more …

  • Employee or contractor – impact on intellectual property

    Employee or contractor – impact on intellectual property

    This article explores the legal implications of determining whether an individual is an employee or contractor. Learn how a multi-factor test can help to identify the correct status, and understand the potential impact on intellectual property.

    Read more …


Send this to a friend