Corporate law Brisbane

Proposed amendments to the requirements for listing on the ASX

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawCorporate lawProposed amendments to the requirements for listing on the ASX

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

On 12 May 2016 the ASX released a Consultation Paper on proposed changes to its requirements for admission to the ASX official list.  The changes to the Listing Rules are designed to maintain and strengthen the reputation of ASX as a market of quality and integrity.  The key proposed changes relate mostly to entities seeking to list in the “ASX listing” category and are discussed in detail below.

Increasing the financial thresholds to be eligible for listing

Entities seeking admission to the ASX must satisfy one of two financial tests – the profit test under listing rule 1.2 or the assets test under listing rule 1.3.

Profit test

Entities with established operations and a track record of profitability are able to seek admission under the profit test.  Currently, the profit test requires that the entity:

  • is a going concern and has conducted the same main business activity during the last 3 full financial years prior to admission;
  • has aggregated profit of at least $1 million from continuing operations for the last 3 full financial years prior to admission; and
  • has consolidated profit from continuing operations of at least $400,000 for the 12 months prior to admission.

While the ASX states that it considers that the profit test overall remains appropriate for the Australian market, it is proposed that the requirement for consolidated profit from continuing operations for the 12 months prior to admission be increased from $400,000 to $500,000.   Apparently this increase is aimed at maintaining appropriate minimum standards of size and quality to be listed on the market.

Asset test

Currently, the minimum requirements for entities other than investment entities to meet the assets test are net tangible assets (NTA) of at least $3 million, or a market capitalisation of at least $10 million.  It is proposed to increase these thresholds to an NTA of at least $5 million or a market capitalisation of at least $20 million.  The proposed increases are claimed to provide greater confirmation that the listed entity has sufficient resources to carry on its business for a reasonable period.

A new minimum free float requirement

The ASX does not currently have in place a rules-based requirement for the minimum proportion of an entity’s securities that will be available at listing for investors to freely trade in the public market (Free Float), although ASX Guidance Note 1 anticipates that entities will list with a free float of at least 10%.  The

ASX has proposed to introduce a rules-based 20% minimum free float requirement for ASX listings at the time of admission.  Free Float will be defined by ASX as:

the percentage of the entity’s main class of securities that are not restricted securities or subject to voluntary escrow, and that are held by non-affiliated security holders”.

The proposal is aimed at supporting liquidity in the secondary market and supporting innovation and emerging growth industries.

Changing the spread test

At it presently stands, under listing rule 1.1 condition 7, ASX’s spread test can be satisfied in one of three ways:

  • by having 400 security holders who hold a parcels of securities with a value of at least $2,000; or
  • by having 350 security holders who hold a parcel of securities with a value of at least $2,000, where there is a free float of at least 25%; or
  • by having 300 security holders who hold a parcel of securities with a value of at least $2,000, where there is a free float of at least 50%.

The ASX has proposed to change the minimum spread requirement for ASX listings to require:

200 security holders if the entity has a free float of less than $50 million, or 100 security holders if the entity has a free float of $50 million or more; and
each security holder counted towards spread must hold a parcel of securities with a value of at least $5,000.

The primary purpose of the spread test is to demonstrate sufficient investor interest in an entity to warrant its listing.

Applying the same working capital requirements to all assets test entities

Under listing rule 1.3.3, all entities admitted under the assets test are currently required to have at least $1.5 million in working capital, after taking into account any budgeted revenue for the first full financial year after listing, with additional requirements for mining and oil and gas exploration entities.  The ASX proposes to standardise the minimum working capital requirement by requiring all entities admitted under the assets test to have at least $1.5 million in working capital available after:

  • taking into account the entity’s budgeted revenue for the first full financial that ends after listing; and
  • allowing for the first full financial year’s budgeted administration costs and the cost of acquiring any assets referred to in the prospectus, PDS or information memorandum (to the extent that those costs will be met out of working capital).

The proposal is apparently aimed at providing greater certainty to investors in relation to the availability of working capital.

Requiring audited accounts from assets test entities

Under listing rule 1.3.5, entities admitted under the assets test are allowed under the rules to provide unaudited accounts and provide accounts for a period shorter than 3 full financial years.  The ASX proposing introducing a new requirement for entities seeking admission under the assets test to produce audited accounts for the last 3 full financial years.  If the accounts for the last full financial year are more than 8 months old, it is proposed that the entity also be required to produce audited or reviewed accounts for the last half year.

The ASX is further proposing that an entity seeking admission under the assets test be required, unless ASX agrees otherwise, to produce 3 full financial years of audited accounts for any entity or business to be acquired by the entity at or ahead of listing.

Strengthening ASX’s ability to refuse admission

The ASX proposes to strengthen its discretion on admission and quotation decisions.  It proposes to amend Guidance Note 1 to:

  • include examples of when the ASX may exercise its discretion not to admit an entity to the official list; and
  • provide actual examples of circumstances that shown when an applicant does not have an acceptable structure and operations to be listed.

We welcome any more practical guidance from the ASX in this regard.

Learning points

Overall, the proposed changes contain more onerous tests and new qualitative criteria with the intention of lifting the quality of listing applications. Whilst the stated intention is altruistic in nature, raising the bar further may appear to be inconsistent with the national innovation agenda.

The changes may be implemented as early as July 2016.

Links and further references

Consultation Paper: Updating ASX’s admission requirements for listed entities, 12 May 2016, ASX Limited

ASX Listing Rules

Further information about corporate law

If you need assistance determining whether your company meets the requirements for listing on the ASX, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights about corporate law

  • Refund obligations for Australian businesses

    Refund obligations for Australian businesses

    In Australia, the main piece of legislation governing the supply of goods and services is the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA), which incorporates the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) in Schedule 2.  These obligations apply in addition to the terms and conditions by which a business trades.  The CCA regulates the interaction between businesses…

    Read more …

  • Are legal expenses tax deductible for new start-ups?

    Are legal expenses tax deductible for new start-ups?

    From 1 July 2015, a newly incorporated company, trust or partnership can immediately deduct a range of professional expenses associated with starting a new business, such as professional, legal and accounting advice.  This change was introduced by the Tax Laws Amendment (Small Business Measures No. 3) Act 2015 (Cth) which amended the Income Tax Assessment…

    Read more …

  • ACCC guide for platform operators updated

    ACCC guide for platform operators updated

    The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has released a Guide to help Platform Operators in the Sharing Economy understand their legal obligations. Learn more about the four key principles, terms and conditions, policies and pricing obligations.

    Read more …

  • “Approved by ASIC” – a $20,000 issue

    “Approved by ASIC” – a $20,000 issue

    The Australian Securities and Investments Commission has taken action against Huntley Management Limited for advertising their products in a way that could mislead consumers. Learn more about this case and what it means for Australian Financial Services Licence holders.

    Read more …

  • What are Share Subscription Agreements?

    What are Share Subscription Agreements?

    A share subscription agreement is a binding promise between a potential shareholder and a company. It outlines the number of shares issued, order and timing of funds advanced,along with common clauses such as conditions precedent, confidentiality, no-shop, and more.

    Read more …

  • Overview of loan agreements

    Overview of loan agreements

    A Loan Agreement is a legally binding document that can help protect the interests of both parties while facilitating the flow of funds. Learn more about common clauses, pitfalls to consider, and relevant cases. For more information, consult a legal expert.

    Read more …

  • What are Teaming Agreements?

    What are Teaming Agreements?

    Teaming agreements can help two or more parties secure a tender or contract with a third party. Learn more about the common clauses, limitations, and risks associated with these agreements, and how to navigate them.

    Read more …

  • Transfer duty implications for loans

    Transfer duty implications for loans

    Transfer Duty in Queensland: does it apply to loans? This article explores the Duties Act 2001 (Qld) and what constitutes a dutiable transaction and dutiable property. Find out if transfer duty applies to loans and learn more about the implications of loan agreements.

    Read more …

  • Transfer duty and issuing units in a unit trust

    Transfer duty and issuing units in a unit trust

    Discover how Queensland transfer duty is applied to dutiable transactions and what it means for your trust. Click through to the article for a comprehensive guide to the Duties Act 2001 (Qld).

    Read more …


Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend