Privacy Law

Swiss company hands over user data

HomePrivate: BlogLegal insightsSwiss company hands over user data

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

3–4 minutes

Protonmail, an end-to-end encrypted secure email provider based in Switzerland, was recently obligated by a Swiss Court order to provide a certain class of user’s IP addresses to French police via the transnational Europol law enforcement agency.  This article considers the Australian statutory perspective on obtaining access to ‘encrypted’ data where such information may be contained within end-to-end encrypted communications.

Legislative foundation for accessing encrypted information

It may be the case that similar, encrypted email or instant message platforms in Australia may be susceptible to Court orders much like Protonmail.  Recently, Dundas Lawyers published an article on the Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Bill 2021 (Bill) which is linked here.  That article highlighted how the Bill could be used to access various types of personal information, including data contained in encrypted messages and emails.  Therefore, in Australia there exists avenues through which the government, through the Australian Federal Police or the Australian Crime Commission (as discussed in our earlier article on the passing of the Surveillance Legislation), can access and obtain control of encrypted personal or business communications.  The parallels between Australian law and the circumstance involving Protonmail are clear.

Notwithstanding the newly enacted Bill, there exists a slightly older amendment to statutes providing for governmental intervention in personal or business communications.  The Telecommunications and Other Legislation Amendment (Assistance and Access) Bill 2018  provides for this possibility by amending the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth) (Act), among other acts.  The Act generally operates in relation to the providers of telecommunication services and may obligate such providers to provide information to government agencies.

The primary function of the amendments was to provide law enforcement and intelligence agencies with the power to make ‘technical assistance requests’,[1] ‘technical assistance notices’[2] and ‘technical capability notices’.[3]  In providing this authority, the Act acknowledges that various enforcement agencies were hampered in their ability to carry out their expected functions as a result of their limited technical capacity to do so.  Often, targets of investigations were capable of usurping scrutiny because their communications were encrypted end-to-end.

It’s worth noting that a broad prohibition against the dissemination of any information retrieved subject to, amongst other things, a technical assistance notice, a technical capability notice or a technical assistance request.[4]  That encrypted information can be accessed by the government appears inevitable in certain circumstances, but it does not necessarily follow that the information accessed will enter the public domain.  The legislation takes appropriate steps to safeguard against this possibility.

Takeaways

It appears that the situation in Switzerland with Protonmail is entirely replicable under Australian statute.  Whilst only two (2) avenues have been identified in this article as to how such governmental access could be facilitated, there may be further avenues open to government bodies allowing them access to personal or professional end-to-end encrypted information.  Thus, Australian businesses need to be aware that legislation has adapted to overcome the barrier presented by end-to-end encryption.  Reasonable checks and balances are in place the ensure that a requirement to provide such information is not unjust, but this does not derogate from the reality that encryption is no longer a safe haven for private, electronically communicated messages.  It follows then, that persons and corporations may, in certain circumstances, consider using non-electronic communication means in respect ultra-sensitive information.

Links and further references

Legislation

Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Bill 2021

Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth)

Telecommunications and Other Legislation Amendment (Assistance and Access) Bill 2018

Further information about accessing encrypted data

If you are a business and need advice on accessing encrypted data, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:

[1] Act s 317G.

[2] Act s 317L.

[3] Act s 317T.

[4] Act s 317ZF.


Related insights about accessing encrypted data

  • Patent granted for software tracking user actions

    Patent granted for software tracking user actions

    A decision by Australian Patent Office provides insight into patentable subject matter for computer-implemented inventions. Case of Facebook, Inc. [2020] APO 19 is a successful example of technical improvement in computer-implemented method, resulting in patentability even with generic computer implementation.

    Read more …

  • Use of IRUs in a telecommunications capacity

    Use of IRUs in a telecommunications capacity

    Learn how to structure IRUs for tax compliance and ensure your cable system capacity services are secure. Discover the key elements you need to include in your agreement to guarantee exclusive access and economic ownership rights.

    Read more …

  • Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (Cth) overview

    Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (Cth) overview

    Online gaming operators in Australia must abide by the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (Cth). Learn more about the rules and regulations, and the consequences when they are not followed.

    Read more …

  • Standard form IT procurement contracts – legal issues

    Standard form IT procurement contracts – legal issues

    Do you know what to look for in an IT procurement agreement? Learn more about the Queensland government QITC framework and key areas to consider when drafting or negotiating an agreement to protect your company’s commercial value.

    Read more …

  • OAIC Notifiable Data Breaches report – July 2020

    OAIC Notifiable Data Breaches report – July 2020

    The OAIC’s Notifiable Data Breaches Report reveals 518 data breaches reported by eligible entities in the first half of 2020. Learn more about the types of personal information involved, the highest reporting sector, and the key takeaways from the report to protect your data.

    Read more …

  • Telco reseller agreements – legal issues

    Telco reseller agreements – legal issues

    Commonwealth supported place (CSP)s must consider legal implications, including liability, data security protocols, and applicable laws when entering into a reseller agreement with a network service provider. Learn more about the obligations and requirements.

    Read more …

  • Website blocking orders – what has to be proven?

    Website blocking orders – what has to be proven?

    This article provides an overview of the requirements for companies wishing to offer equity-based crowd-sourced funding in Australia. It covers the types of companies eligible, the type of securities allowed, and the issuer cap.

    Read more …

  • Dark fibre contracts for telecommunications providers

    Dark fibre contracts for telecommunications providers

    This article explains the complexities and benefits of dark fibre access, outlining key elements to consider for telecoms service agreements between providers and business end users. It covers supplier’s service levels, liability and security provisions.

    Read more …

  • What does a network access agreement cover?

    What does a network access agreement cover?

    Network access agreements are complex legal documents. This article outlines key areas to consider, such as routing, fault and interruption, acceptance testing, suspension, pass through costs, and indemnity.

    Read more …

Send this to a friend