Tax Law

Tax incentives for early-stage innovation investors

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawCorporate lawTax incentives for early-stage innovation investors

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

2–3 minutes

The Australian Government has tabled the Tax Laws Amendment (Tax Incentives for Innovation) Bill 2016 (Bill) to amend the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) (ITAA).  The purpose of the Bill is to encourage innovation and foster an entrepreneurial and risk taking culture.  According to the summary of the first reading of the Bill it seeks to address the difficulties faced in raising capital by many Australian Early Stage Innovation Companies (ESICs), by connecting relevant start-ups with investors that have both the requisite funds and business experience to assist entrepreneurs in developing successful and innovative companies.

What changes does the Bill propose?

The Bill creates a new Subdivision 360-A ‘Tax incentives for early stage investors in innovation companies’, of the ITAA which allows entities that acquire newly issued shares in a qualifying ESIC to receive a non-refundable carry-forward tax offset of 20 per cent of the value of their investment subject to a maximum offset cap of $200,000. In addition, investors may disregard capital gains realised on shares in qualifying ESICs that have been held for between one (1) and ten (10) years, and must disregard any capital losses realised on these shares held for less than ten (10) years.

What investments qualify for the scheme?

Qualifying investors must invest directly, or through a company, trust or partnership in qualifying shares of the ESIC. Qualifying shares are newly issued equity interests in the ESIC. Whilst there are no restrictions on the investor’s residency, the investor must not be affiliated with the ESIC.

Moreover, there is total annual investment limit of $50,000 for retail (non-sophisticated) investors. Moreover, the investor must not be affiliated with the ESIC.

What is a qualifying ESIC?

Qualifying ESICs are Australian-incorporated companies that pass a two-limb test:

  1. The early stage limb – the company must be in the early stage of its development. A company will satisfy this limb if:
    1. it has been recently incorporated or registered in the Australian Business Register; and
    2. it has total expenses of $1 million or less; and
    3. it has assessable income of $200,000 or less; and
    4. it is not listed on a stock exchange.
  2. The innovation limb – the company must be developing new or significantly improved innovations with the purpose of commercialisation to generate an economic return. To satisfy this test, a company can either:
    1. fulfil a principle-based definition (which takes into account matters such as the company’s potential for high growth); or
    2. have at least 100 points for meeting certain objective activity-based criteria.

If enacted when will the amendments commence?

The Bill is proposed to commence on 1 July 2016.  In four (4) years the Government aims to review the tax incentive to determine if it is delivering on its policy outcomes. There may even be scope to extend the incentive to indirect investments through an Australian Innovation Fund, depending on stakeholder feedback.

Links and further references

Legislation

Tax Laws Amendment (Tax Incentives for Innovation) Bill 2016

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth)

Other links

ESIC Directory

Further information about corporate law

If you need advice to ensure that an investment in your early stage investment company is likely comply, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion: 


Related insights about corporate law

  • Working with an Expert Adviser

    Working with an Expert Adviser

    Expert advisors may be consulted for business acquisitions, including IT consultants, industry experts, insurance brokers, scientists, lawyers, and patent attorneys. Advisory team must understand role, scope of work, and due date for successful work.

    Read more …

  • Pre-acquisition planning – shares or assets?

    Pre-acquisition planning – shares or assets?

    Planning a business acquisition? Consider structure, ownership, securities, contract and assets. Generally, asset purchase or security acquisition? Don’t forget to factor in the Target’s wishes.

    Read more …

  • Selecting a business valuation methodology

    Selecting a business valuation methodology

    Are you considering a business acquisition? Learn three methods of valuation and which are best for businesses with high asset values, those that are not profitable, and those valued on a going concern basis. Read this article from RSM Bird Cameron Chartered Accountants to find out more.

    Read more …

  • Should you work in the industry before you buy?

    Should you work in the industry before you buy?

    Are you considering a business acquisition? Learn how working in the business can help verify takings and the importance of a tuition period in the Real Estate Institute of Queensland (REIQ) Business Sale Contract. Click through to find out more.

    Read more …

  • How to identify fraudulent workers’ comp claims

    How to identify fraudulent workers’ comp claims

    Learn how to identify and prevent Worker’s Compensation fraud with this article. Employees found guilty of fraud face criminal convictions, fines up to $55,000 and a max of five (5) years imprisonment.

    Read more …

  • Electronic service of legal documents

    Electronic service of legal documents

    The decision in Conveyor & General Engineering Pty Ltd v Basetec Services Pty Ltd [2014] QSC 30 examined validity of service of documents via email and Dropbox. Find out judgement and “take-aways” to help navigate complex legal process of document service.

    Read more …

  • Shareholders’ agreements and inconsistency clauses explained

    Shareholders’ agreements and inconsistency clauses explained

    When shareholders are restricted from accessing company information, it may be a sign of a dispute. The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) provides mechanisms for minority shareholders to obtain relevant information, but they must prove they are acting in ‘good faith’ and ‘for a proper purpose’.

    Read more …

  • ACCC v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 634

    ACCC v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 634

    In Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Limited [2014] FCA 634, Coles has been accused of misleading customers over their partially-baked bread. Learn more, including the obiter suggested by Allsop CJ, by clicking through to the article.

    Read more …

  • ACCC v A Whistle (1979) PL

    ACCC v A Whistle (1979) PL

    The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has taken action against a business for allegedly publishing false reviews online. Learn more about the case and what businesses can do to avoid breaching the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) and ACCC guidelines.

    Read more …

Send this to a friend