misleading and deceptive

Changes to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Limited [2014] FCA 634

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawChanges to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Limited [2014] FCA 634

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

2–3 minutes

Update to our article published on 23 July 2014

See further update published 14 April 2015

On 29 September 2014, Chief Justice Allsop of the Federal Court handed down his judgment in the Coles “Fresh Bread” case.

This decision highlights the potential perils of “pushing the boundaries” when it comes to advertising products for sale in a way that could be construed as misleading or deceptive within the meaning of section 18 of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) which is contained within Schedule 2 the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth).

Coles has been restrained for a period of 3 years from making any representations on any packaging that its bread was made or baked on the same day it was sold or baked from fresh dough when that is not the case.

Coles has also been ordered to display a corrective notice in a prominent location on counters in Coles Bakery Stores and through a prominent “one-click link” displayed in the top one-third of its homepage.

The Court made various declarations including that in marketing various bread products as “Freshly Baked In-Store” and “Baked Today, Sold Today”, Coles:

  • engaged in conduct in trade or commerce that was misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive, in contravention of section 18 of the ACL
  • made a representation in trade or commerce, in connection with the supply or possible supply or promotion of the supply of goods that was false or misleading as to the history of the goods in contravention of section 29(1)(a) of the ACL; and
  • engaged in conduct in trade or commerce that was liable to mislead the public as to the nature, the manufacturing process, and the characteristics of goods in contravention of section 33 of the ACL.

A copy of his Honour’s reasons for judgment and a copy of the corrective notice can be viewed here: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Limited (No 2) [2014] FCA 1022.

Further information

If you need further information about the potential of making misleading and deceptive statements in advertising, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights on competition and commercial law

  • Failure to review contracts can cost millions…

    Failure to review contracts can cost millions…

    The case of The State of NSW v UXC Limited [2011] NSWCS 530 serves as a reminder of the need for organisations to pay close attention to contract details. An oversight can result in costly damages.

    Read more …

  • What exactly is securities hawking?

    What exactly is securities hawking?

    This article examines Section 736 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), which prohibits security hawking. It outlines exemptions, consequences, definitions and further references.

    Read more …

  • Misleading or deceptive conduct through Google AdWords

    Misleading or deceptive conduct through Google AdWords

    The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) took action against Trading Post Australia and Google in 2007. The Federal Court found Trading Post had misled/deceived in Google’s AdWords service on Thursday 22 September 2011. The ACCC’s claims against Google were dismissed.

    Read more …

  • Commercialising intellectual property assets

    Commercialising intellectual property assets

    Discover the various ways to unlock the commercial value of your Intellectual Property (IP). Learn about intellectual property licensing, intellectual property sale and subsequent licensing, joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions and spin out entities.

    Read more …

  • Strategy over structure

    Strategy over structure

    Strategic planning is essential for new or expanding businesses. It can improve operating efficiencies, provide clarity on company culture, better customer relations, and protect personal/business assets. A comprehensive plan can drive better success for the business and give external stakeholders the best chance to offer value.

    Read more …

  • Licence Agreements to exploit IP

    Licence Agreements to exploit IP

    Discover the benefits of licensing your intellectual property and how to maximise its commercial value. Learn about the rights and permissions you can grant to another party, and the payments or royalties you can receive in exchange.

    Read more …


Posted

in

, ,
Send this to a friend