copyright law

Canva – who owns the artwork created by users?

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

The general rule about ownership of copyright in a literary or artistic work is that copyright vests in the ‘original author’, as per section 35(2) of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (Copyright Act).[1]  From there, ownership depends on whether or not the original author is doing the work within the scope of their employment, in which case the works belong to the employer unless the author is an individual contractor, whereby they retain ownership regardless.[2]  This article discusses ownership of copyright in the context of the popular graphic design platform-as-a-service Canva.

There are ten (10) agreements (Canva Agreements) that govern the customers’ use of Canva, as follows:

This article discusses the Terms of Use, Content License Agreement and AI Product Terms

The following terms are relevant to the ownership of copyright works as defined in the Canva Agreements:

  • User Content is defined as any content uploaded to Canva by the User; and
  • Licensed IP means content accessible to Users provided by Canva and its associated content providers.

Creation of artistic works by users of Canva

There are several different scenarios that apply to a user creating an artistic work in Canva.  We consider the major scenarios below.

What if the user creates an image using Canva from scratch?

Anyone who uses Canva automatically becomes a user who is subject to the Canva Agreements (User).  Canva’s Terms of Use states at paragraph 4a that Users “own all rights, title and interest in and to… User Content”.  Users automatically grant a license to Canva over their work, however the Terms of Use state that this will be exercised “solely to the extent necessary” and only to the User that created it.[3]

If a User creates an original artistic work entirely from scratch using tools, such as drawing shapes, selecting fonts, inserting text or uploading their own images, then they are the original author, and it follows that they are the owner of any copyright.  Since the work is not a derivative of or an adaption of Canva’s intellectual property, the user retains full ownership over the design.  This concept is no different to a licensed user of Adobe Photoshop creating the same work using that program.

What if the image created incorporates Canva’s licensed IP?

If the User creates an artistic work that incorporates Licensed IP, such as stock photos, icons, fonts, or templates, then copyright ownership becomes more complex.  While the User has the right to use the new arrangement or combination of elements they created, the design does not attract copyright protection because it is not an original work.

Instead, the User is granted a “perpetual, non-exclusive, non-transferable worldwide license” to use those elements under Canva’s Content Licence Agreement.[4]  This license permits designs incorporating Canva’s intellectual property to be used for personal, promotional, resale, relicense and other distribution purposes.[5]

Despite the breadth of permitted uses, all final designs remain subject to licensing restrictions as Canva retains ownership of its intellectual property, and User’s rights are derivative and conditional.  Users cannot “sub-license, re-sell, rent, lend, assign, gift or otherwise transfer or distribute” the standalone content or the rights to the content,[6] nor can any part of the content be trademarked.[7]

This means that any content created in Canva that incorporates pre-existing designs or design elements can be used by the User but cannot be subject to copyright protection.

What if a User asks the AI feature to create an image?

When Canva’s Artificial Intelligence (AI) features, such as the text-to-image tool, are utilised to create a completely new image, the resulting output is subject to the AI Product Terms

According to these terms, the User retains all rights of both the Input, such as their written prompts or uploaded files, and the Output, usually an AI-generated image, to the extent permitted by law.[8]  Currently, the Copyright Act does not extend intellectual property protection to any computer-generated work as the AI ‘creation’ process lacks the required elements of an identifiable ‘author’ and ‘independent intellectual effort’.[9]  Therefore, Canva could not claim or enforce ownership over works generated by its AI system even if it sought to. 

Canva’s AI Product Terms state that it “will not make any copyright ownership claim over your Input or Output” and that the created artistic works may be used “for any legal purpose” as long as the User does not violate the following requirements to:

Manually review each Output before sharing or while streaming;

Attribute the content to your name or your company;

Indicate that the content is AI-generated in a way no user could reasonably miss or misunderstand;

Once again, the result is that AI-generated designs created on Canva’s platform have no restrictions on use, but ownership does not vest in the User or any other entity.

What does this mean for businesses using Canva?

Businesses need to be careful when creating artistic works using Canva if they intend to base applications for trade mark protection on such images if they incorporate Canva’s background IP.  The same care needs to be taken if attempting to license artistic works created in Canva.

Links and further references

Canva Terms of Use

Canva Content License Agreement

Canva AI Product Terms

Legislation

Copyright Act 1968 (Cth)

Cases

IceTV Pty Limited v Nine Network Australia Pty Limited [2009] 239 CLR 458

Further information about copyright protection

If you need advice on intellectual property rights and Canva’s terms of use, please contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:

[1] Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) s 35(2).

[2] Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) s 35(6).

[3] Canva, Terms of Use clause 4(a).

[4] Canva, Content License Agreement clauses 2, 3.

[5] Canva, Content License Agreement clause 5.

[6] Canva, Content License Agreement clause 9(1).

[7] Canva, Content License Agreement clause 9(2).

[8] Canva, AI Product Terms.

[9] IceTV Pty Limited v Nine Network Australia Pty Limited [2009] 239 CLR 458 para 48.


Related insights about copyright

  • Assigning intellectual property and the right to sue

    Assigning intellectual property and the right to sue

    This case examines Re Taypar Pty Ltd v Benko Santic [1989] FCA 543, which determined that an assignee of intellectual property rights cannot sue for pre-assignment infringements, unless the assignment explicitly assigns a right to do so.

    Read more …

  • Adaptations and computer code – copyright issues

    Adaptations and computer code – copyright issues

    An adaption in copyright is the exclusive right of the owner of the work in question.  Section 10 of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (Act) defines adaption as it relates to literary works in dramatic and non-dramatic forms, in a computer program and in relation to a musical work.   The rights that apply to adaptions…

    Read more …

  • Innocent copyright infringement explained

    Innocent copyright infringement explained

    This article examines the legal defence of “innocent infringement” in the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Find out what evidence is needed to prove both the subjective and objective elements of this defence, and learn the key takeaways to consider when using it in copyright disputes.

    Read more …

  • Computer code libraries and copyright ownership

    Computer code libraries and copyright ownership

    The Australian case of Redrock Holdings Pty Ltd and Hotline Communications Ltd v Hinkley [2001] VSC 91 has shed light on how the ownership of copyright in code libraries is determined. Learn more about the dispute and its implications for copyright ownership in this blog post.

    Read more …

  • Software litigation – how much evidence is sufficient?

    Software litigation – how much evidence is sufficient?

    The Court was asked to decide if the applicant had enough info to begin proceedings for copyright infringement and breach of confidence in Qudos Mutual Ltd v Infosys Ltd [2019] FCA 702. Qudos was not satisfied with what they had, so the Court ordered the production of further documents and source code.

    Read more …

  • Has my software been copied? – legal test explained

    Has my software been copied? – legal test explained

    This article examines the legal test for a “substantial reproduction” of computer code, as established by the High Court in Data Access Corporation v Powerflex Services Pty Ltd [1999] HCA 49 and further discussed in subsequent cases. The Court will consider the essential features of the work to determine if there has been a substantial…

    Read more …

  • Changes to copyright protection durations

    Changes to copyright protection durations

    The Australian Government passed a major amendment to the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) which will have a significant impact on copyright materials. Find out what the changes are and how they may affect you by reading this article.

    Read more …

  • Copyright infringement for computer code

    Copyright infringement for computer code

    Computer code is automatically protected by copyright. Unauthorised reproduction of it may constitute an infringement, as illustrated by two federal cases. To understand copyright infringement with respect to computer code, read “Who owns the code?”

    Read more …

  • Who holds ownership of the code?

    Who holds ownership of the code?

    Understand who owns the computer code used in software development projects. Consider employee or contractor engagement, joint ownership, and assignment of copyright to ensure your project is protected.

    Read more …

Send this to a friend