Lawyers for litigation

Mokhtari v Piacentini & Son PL [2025] FCA 26

Mokhtari v Piacentini & Son PL [2025] FCA 26

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for orders for preservation of documents – where orders made referring the issue of the extent and nature of discovery for consideration at a conference by a registrar – where applicant alleges that system updates to computing software used by the respondent may compromise the discovery process – whether likely that documents will be lost or destroyed – whether preservation orders appropriate in the circumstances – held materials in support of application do not reveal a basis for concern that critical documents will be destroyed or lost – orders as sought by the applicant would circumvent the conference to be convened before the registrar – application dismissed


Related cases – asset preservation orders

  • Raiz v Director of Professional Services Review [2023] FCA 771

    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory application seeking orders for non-standard discovery – where the applicant seeks discovery by way of categories – whether discovery sought wider than issues raised by grounds for judicial review – whether some categories mere “fishing”

  • Commissioner for Consumer Affairs (SA) v Star Plus Group Pty Ltd (in liq) [2023] FCA 778

    CONSUMER LAW – Application by regulator for declaratory and injunctive relief together with the imposition of pecuniary penalties for conduct by the respondents – where respondents posted fake consumer testimonials and reviews of their business to comparator websites – where respondents provided false tax invoices to a comparator website in order to post false testimonials…

  • Novartis AG v Pharmacor Pty Limited [2023] FCA 804

    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – patents – where in the principal proceeding the respondent alleges that the patent in suit does not disclose the best method of performing the invention – discovery – where applicants oppose the respondent’s proposed discovery category

Send this to a friend