copyright dispute lawyer

Proposed changes to use of orphan works

HomePrivate: BlogIP litigation and disputesCopyright infringementProposed changes to use of orphan works

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

3–4 minutes

On 13 August 2020, Paul Fletcher MP, Minister for Communications, Cyber Safety and the Arts, announced amendments to the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (Act).  The amendments follow two (2) years of stakeholder consultation, and finalise the Government’s response to the Productivity Commission’s 2016 Intellectual Property Arrangements Report.  The reforms focus on the use of “orphan works”, with an aim to provide a framework for copyright that is fit for the digital age.

What are orphan works?

Orphan works are works where the copyright owner cannot be identified, meaning it is difficult for a proposed user to seek permission to reproduce them.  An orphan work can be any type of work in which copyright subsists, such as photographs, paintings, written works and sound recordings (Orphan Work).

Works may be orphaned through a variety of circumstances, including where:

  • the work created was a long time ago;
  • required information was missing or deliberately removed, such as lack of metadata on images online; and
  • the owner has inadequate skills or tools to accurately claim rights in the works.

There is no specific provision in relation to the use of Orphan Works in the Act.  Unless covered by an exception or licence, the use of an orphan work may amount to an infringement of copyright.

Exceptions

There are some exceptions which allow individuals to use or reproduce orphan works.  These include the fair dealing exception and a statutory license.  The fair dealing exception only covers specific circumstances, including:

  • giving legal advice;
  • news reporting;
  • criticism;
  • research; and
  • parody.

Libraries and archives may also utilise orphan works for socially useful purposes under section 200AB of the Act.  The Copyright Amendment (Disability Access and Other Measures) Act 2017 (Cth) enhanced protection for libraries and archives to an extent by permitting them to create “preservation copies” of resource in their collections without infringing copyright.

A proposed limited liability scheme for use of orphan works

The proposed amendments include a limited liability scheme for use of Orphan Works.  This scheme will permit the use of copyright material where:

  • a reasonably diligent search has been performed, but the copyright owner cannot be identified or located; and
  • as far as reasonably possible, the work has been clearly attributed to the author.

The scope of diligent searches has not yet been confirmed, so it is strongly recommended for creative industries and other relevant sectors to assist in establishing guidelines around performing diligent searches.

If a copyright owner comes forward, users will be exempt from liability for use of the work for the period it was orphaned.  However, users will only be allowed to continue using the work on reasonable terms as agreed with the copyright owner or as fixed by the Copyright Tribunal.  If reasonable terms cannot be met, the copyright owner may seek an injunction against future use of their work.

Other proposed amendments

There are other proposed amendments of the limited liability scheme, including:

  • new specific fair dealing exception for quoting copyright material, subject to the quotation occurring for the purposes of non-commercial use;
  • the update of the library and archives exceptions, so that they are equally applied to all copyright materials and are technologically neutral;
  • the amendment of education exceptions, where current limitations and uncertainties around the use of copyright material in classroom teaching are removed; and
  • the streamline of government statutory licensing regime, which involves simplifying the method of determining fees payable to collecting societies and how these are paid.

Takeaways

The proposed reforms are forecast to benefit both the owner of an Orphan Work and the users of the works. It will allow orphan works to be utilised in creative industries, and will result in larger collections of works to be increasingly accessible by libraries, archives and educational institutions.

Links and further references

Legislation

Copyright Act 1968 (Cth)

Copyright Amendment (Disability Access and Other Measures) Act 2017 (Cth)

Report

2016 Intellectual Property Arrangements Report

Further information about orphan works

If you need advice on any protecting your copyright, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free and discussion:


Related insights about orphan works

  • Patentability of computer-implemented inventions

    Patentability of computer-implemented inventions

    The question of patentability of so called “computer-implemented” inventions has been the subject of legal debate in Australia for a number of years.  The September 2018 of the Full Court of the Federal Court in  Encompass Corporation Pty Ltd v Infotrack Pty Ltd [2019] FCAFC 161 was long anticipated by intellectual property lawyers and patent…

    Read more …

  • Phasing out the innovation patent system

    Phasing out the innovation patent system

    The Senate has recommended a bill that could have a major impact on small and medium-sized businesses. Find out what changes are proposed and what it could mean for your intellectual property.

    Read more …

  • Software litigation – how much evidence is sufficient?

    Software litigation – how much evidence is sufficient?

    The Court was asked to decide if the applicant had enough info to begin proceedings for copyright infringement and breach of confidence in Qudos Mutual Ltd v Infosys Ltd [2019] FCA 702. Qudos was not satisfied with what they had, so the Court ordered the production of further documents and source code.

    Read more …

  • Has my software been copied? – legal test explained

    Has my software been copied? – legal test explained

    This article examines the legal test for a “substantial reproduction” of computer code, as established by the High Court in Data Access Corporation v Powerflex Services Pty Ltd [1999] HCA 49 and further discussed in subsequent cases. The Court will consider the essential features of the work to determine if there has been a substantial…

    Read more …

  • Not so swole – Trade marks removed for non-use

    The Federal Court examined the evidence needed to prove intention to use a trade mark in good faith. Find out what happened when an application for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal was refused.

    Read more …

  • Confusing marks – Sensis v Senses

    Sensis Pty Ltd v Senses Direct Mail and Fulfillment Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 719: Court ruled SENSES marks deceptively similar to SENSIS marks, highlighting importance of engaging intellectual property lawyers when building a brand. Marks can be infringing if spelling is only slightly different, if it resembles another and likely to deceive and cause confusion.

    Read more …

  • Security for legal costs in patent invalidity cross-claims

    Security for legal costs in patent invalidity cross-claims

    This article examines the application of section 232 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) in 50/50 or equal ownership disputes. The WA Supreme Court has found that oppressive conduct can still be asserted in equal ownership situations.

    Read more …

  • Use of competitor’s confidential information

    Use of competitor’s confidential information

    Many businesses try to increase market share by employing a competitor’s member of staff who may bring with them relationships and information acquired over the years.  Employees owe fiduciary duties to their employers meaning, among other things, that an employee cannot make a personal gain by using confidential information acquired in the course of their…

    Read more …

  • Patent infringement lawyer

    Patent infringement lawyer

    This article explores the complexities of patent infringement in Australia. Learn more about the patent layout, essential integers, and remedies available to protect your intellectual property.

    Read more …

Send this to a friend