We are often asked by employers whether or not they can summarily dismiss an employee for various reasons ranging from persistent poor performance to blatant disobedience. Termination on this basis is also referred to as ‘termination without notice’.
To summarily dismiss an employee:
- the employee must have committed an act of serious misconduct; and
- the employer must afford the employee procedural fairness.
What is serious misconduct?
The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act) defines serious misconduct in section 12 as having the meaning prescribed by regulations. Regulation 1.07(2) of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth)(Regulations) define serious misconduct as including:
- wilful or deliberate behaviour by an employee that is inconsistent with the continuation of the contract of employment;
- conduct that causes serious and imminent risk to the health or safety of a person; or
- conduct that causes serious and imminent risk to the reputation, viability or profitability of the employer’s business;
- the employee, in the course of the employee’s employment, engaging in:
- theft;
- fraud; or
- assault;
- the employee being intoxicated at work; and
- the employee refusing to carry out a lawful and reasonable instruction that is consistent with the employee’s contract of employment.
Examples of actions by employees that amount to serious misconduct
Below are some examples of conduct by employees which have been held to satisfy Regulation 1.07(2):
- Regulation 1.07(2)(a) – wilful or deliberate behaviour by an employee that is inconsistent with the continuation of the contract of employment, such as:
- sending emails to clients of current employer about your new business venture that will be competing with business of employer;
- using a company car without authorisation or without a drivers licence;[2]
- Regulation 1.07(2)(b) – conduct that causes serious and imminent risk to the health or safety of a person, such as:
- Regulation 1.07(2)(c) – conduct that causes serious and imminent risk to the reputation, viability or profitability of the employer’s business, such as:
- Regulation 1.07(2)(d) -an employee, in the course of employment engaging in:
- Regulation 1.07(2)(e) – Intoxication at work
- Consuming alcohol to the degree that the employee is so impaired that they are unfit to be entrusted with their duties or with any duty that they may be called upon to perform;[10]
- Regulation 1.07(2)(f) – the employee refusing to carry out a lawful and reasonable instruction that is consistent with the employee’s contract of employment. Examples include:
Procedural fairness
After identifying conduct by the employee that may amount to serious misconduct, it is necessary to give the employee the opportunity to respond to the allegations (Procedural Fairness). So that the employee cannot claim that they were denied natural justice or Procedural Fairness, the employer must allow the employee to address the allegations, by talking steps such as:
- arranging to meet with the employee, allowing them to have a support person present;
- presenting the employee with all the facts and evidence supporting the allegations of serious misconduct;
- allowing the employee to respond to the allegations; and
- providing the employee with a letter of termination, confirming the facts and evidence supporting the finding of serious misconduct and any response the employee gave.
After providing the employee with the opportunity to respond to your allegations, provided that there is no reasonable explanation, then the employer may be able to terminate the employee for serious misconduct.
Links and further references
Cases
Applicant v Respondent [2014] FWC 3189
Bradford Pedley v IPMS Pty Ltd T/A peckvonhartel [2013] FWC 4282
Burns v Sacred Heart Mission Inc [2014] FWC 3188
Hansen v Mt Martha Community Learning Centre Inc [2015] FCA 1099
Parmalat Food Products Pty Ltd v Wililo [2011] FWAFB 1166
Plessas v Philip Foxman T/A Botany Building Recyclers Pty Ltd [2013] FWC 5910
Powell v Hunter Water Corporation [2012] FWA 6938
Rose v Tahmoor Coal Pty Ltd [2013] FWC 4291
Sheikholeslami v University of NSW (No.3) [2008] FMCA 35
Steri-Flow Filtration Systems (Aust) Pty Ltd v Craig Erskine [2013] FWCFB 1943
Tymoszuk v Comfortdelgro Cabcharge Pty Ltd T/As Westbus Region 1 [2013] FWC 3507
Further information about employment law for employers
As an employer, if you find yourself in a position where you consider that it is necessary to summarily dismiss an employee for serious misconduct, please contact us for an obligation free and confidential discussion.
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Disclaimer
This article contains general commentary only. You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice. Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstances.
[2] Plessas v Philip Foxman T/A Botany Building Recyclers Pty Ltd [2013] FWC 5910 at [41]-[42].
[3] Rose v Tahmoor Coal Pty Ltd [2013] FWC 4291.
[4] Tymoszuk v Comfortdelgro Cabcharge Pty Ltd T/As Westbus Region 1 [2013] FWC 3507 at [43].
[5] Parmalat Food Products Pty Ltd v Wililo [2011] FWAFB 1166.
[6] Applicant v Respondent [2014] FWC 3189 at [37]-[40].
[7] Glenn Howie v The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals T/A RSCPA-ACT [2014] FWC 2771 at [65].
[8] Steri-Flow Filtration Systems (Aust) Pty Ltd v Craig Erskine [2013] FWCFB 1943.
[9] DP World Sydney Limited v Lambley [2012] FWAFB 4810.
[10] Fair Work Regulations 2009 Reg 1.07(3)(b) and 1.07(5).
[11] Sheikholeslami v University of NSW (No.3) [2008] FMCA 35 at [115] – [125].
[12] Powell v Hunter Water Corporation [2012] FWA 6938.
[13] Burns v Sacred Heart Mission Inc [2014] FWC 3188.
Related insights about employment law for employers
-
Know-how vs confidential information
Understand the difference between “know-how” and confidential information when it comes to employer-employee relationships. Find out how to protect confidential trade secrets and use broad contractual terms to ensure protection. Click through to get the full details.
-
The doctrine of repudiation – when deals go bad
Contracting in business can be tricky, but the doctrine of repudiation may provide a way to end a contract and seek compensation. Learn more about this complex topic.
-
Bullying in the workplace by a body corporate
This investigation reveals the legal implications of workplace bullying in a body corporate. Find out what the Obligations of Reasonableness and the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) mean for workers and how to apply for an order to stop the bullying.
-
What’s an unfair preference claim?
Understand the implications of unsecured debts, insolvent transactions, and unfair preference claims in the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Discover the defences available to protect against unfair preference claims and other related legal matters.
-
Contracting with Minors – is it even possible?
In the innovation economy it is becoming more prevalent for individuals aged less than eighteen (18) years (Minors) to seek to build enterprises. From time to time we are asked to consider whether a client can contract with a Minor. The law in Australia[1] and Queensland[2] states that a Minor is someone who has yet…
-
Changes affecting unfair dismissal and minimum wage
Employers should be aware of three changes to employment law that came into effect on 1 July 2016, which have a significant impact on employee rights, including the unfair dismissal high income threshold, maximum compensation for claims, and minimum wage.
-
Terminating a contract with no set end date
In practice, we come across commercial agreements of varying types (Contracts) that, for whatever reason, don’t provide for a term or an end date (Expiry Date). There may have been reasons for this at the time that can no longer be recalled. It raises a number of issues, particularly where the subject matter of the…
-
Letting go of employees threatening to go to the media
When employees leak confidential information or threaten to go to the media, employers can face serious consequences. Find out what the Fair Work Commission says about this issue and what options employers have to protect themselves.
-
Can employers dismiss employees for failing to follow instructions?
When an employee fails to follow their employer’s instructions, the consequences can be serious. Learn about the steps employers must take before termination, and how to protect against unfair dismissal claims.
