internet law

The Australian Cyber Law Map – overview

HomePrivate: BlogIndustry expertiseCyber security consultantsThe Australian Cyber Law Map – overview

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

3–4 minutes

The Australian Cyber Law Map (Map) is a collaborative guide intended to help legal practitioners navigate through the detailed and complicated legal landscape of Australian cyber-related legislation and case law. Within the Map, the ever-evolving area of cyber law has existing principles and new development categorises.  The Map and the categories it focuses on can be easily understood via the following visualisation.

australian-cyber-law-map-table

This article discusses the Map and its key benefits and applications.

The Map’s benefits

The Map provides some clarity, in an area of law that is developing at such a substantial rate that it is difficult for practitioners to keep abreast of changes.  Added to this challenge is the lack of certainty in Australia’s cyber laws.  That is to say, new and rapid technological developments may demand responsive legislative implementations.  There is no dedicated instrument intended solely to respond to the, often positively, disruptive impact that innovative technologies have in various areas of law.  For example, there is no legislation governing the interface between cyber law and the law surrounding commercial enterprises.

Notwithstanding that such interface will often result in safer, more secure commercial dealings, for example, smart contracts protected through blockchain technology, the interface, and other cyber developments, need to be regulated to ensure fairness and deter opportunistic misdealing.

Applications

The Map details how, in the context of an increasingly digital commercial scene, common cyber issues or disputes may give rise to legal remedies. The Map considers how existing legal principles surrounding contracts, directors’ duties and mergers and acquisitions interact with cyber law.  For example, the Map discusses established common law principle, the doctrine of frustration,[1] to modern circumstances.  The Map states that negligence may prevent a party from relying on frustration in response to a cyber risk, such as where careless mistakes are involved.[2]

On a larger scale, the project is contributing to societal welfare by bringing to the forefront of the legal profession expert analysis of how cyber-law may interact with and protect critical infrastructure.  The Map considers the Australian Government’s Critical Infrastructure Resilience Strategy (Strategy) in order to provide analysis which may be assistive in policy decisions.  The Strategy provides the following definition for critical infrastructure:

…those physical facilities, supply chains, information technologies and communication networks, which if destroyed, degraded or rendered unavailable for an extended period, would significantly impact on the social or economic wellbeing of the nation, or affect Australia’s ability to conduct national defence and ensure national security.

One would need to look no further than the recent cyber-attack on the Colonial Pipeline to understand the importance of legislative and policy protections being in place to prevent or deter such attacks.  Proper legislative safeguards surrounding cyber-security will protect critical infrastructure’s continued operation in the face of all hazards.  The Map is assistive in bringing about this end by being a mechanism for the recognition and communication of legal analysis performed by leading experts in the field of cyber law.

Takeaways

The Map aims to guide the legal profession across areas of cyber law in the country and its application to certain areas of law.  These areas are: Commercial Enterprises, Cyber Offences, Infrastructure, International Law, National Security and Personal Rights.  The Map strives to provide clarity amongst the challenges of practicing in the ever-changing legal landscape of Australian cyber law.  What has been evidenced so far is the Map providing frameworks for certain issues such as when negligence can impact on the doctrine of frustration in contract law matters.

Further information about Australian cyber law

If you need advice on the evolving area of Australian cyber law, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights about Australian cyber law

  • ACCC guide on business use of social media

    ACCC guide on business use of social media

    The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has released a guide for businesses engaging with customers on social media, covering response times, substantiating claims and offering refunds. The guide takes into account the size of businesses and amount of followers when determining response times.

    Read more …

  • Custom end user licence agreements for the iStore

    Custom end user licence agreements for the iStore

    Launching an App in the iStore? Developers can create a bespoke End User Licence Agreement to meet Apple’s minimum requirements. Learn more about creating legally binding terms and conditions, as well as the Apple guide, in this article.

    Read more …

  • Selling into the EU – what do the cookie laws mean for your website?

    Selling into the EU – what do the cookie laws mean for your website?

    The UK has adopted the European Union’s cookie laws, requiring website operators to obtain consent from users to save and use cookies. Fines can be imposed for non-compliance, so understanding the law is essential.

    Read more …

  • Are your website’s terms and conditions legally binding?

    Are your website’s terms and conditions legally binding?

    Online contracts have legal implications and must adhere to consumer protection regulations. The Australian case of eBay International AG v Creative Festival Entertainment Pty Limited (ACN 098 183 281) [2006] FCA 1768 highlights the importance of understanding these regulations when drafting online contracts.

    Read more …

  • Thumbs down to McDonald’s “send to friend” campaign

    Thumbs down to McDonald’s “send to friend” campaign

    Businesses should be aware of their legal obligations when using ‘send to friends’ facilities to avoid potential liability for breach of anti-spam laws. Find out how one company faced legal action for failing to comply with the Spam Act 2003 (Cth).

    Read more …

  • User posts can be advertisements!

    User posts can be advertisements!

    The Advertising Standards Board upholds the Code of Ethics for advertising and marketing communications. Decisions included user comments on social media being subject to the Code. Advertisers must take extra care to comply.

    Read more …

  • Social media policies are a necessity for large companies – Fair Work Australia

    Social media policies are a necessity for large companies – Fair Work Australia

    The case of Stutsel v Linfox Australia Pty Limited [2011] FWA 8444 highlights the importance of having a clear social media policy. Mr Stutsel’s dismissal for making derogatory comments on Facebook was deemed unfair, as the company lacked a formal policy on social media use. This case serves as a reminder that businesses should implement…

    Read more …

  • What is a Twitter follower worth?

    What is a Twitter follower worth?

    This legal case could have far-reaching implications for the value of social media followers and connections. Find out what this dispute between Phonedog and Noah Kravitz could mean for employers and employees in the future.

    Read more …

  • Misleading or deceptive conduct through Google AdWords

    Misleading or deceptive conduct through Google AdWords

    The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) took action against Trading Post Australia and Google in 2007. The Federal Court found Trading Post had misled/deceived in Google’s AdWords service on Thursday 22 September 2011. The ACCC’s claims against Google were dismissed.

    Read more …

Send this to a friend