employment law

Why employers require a drug and alcohol policy

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawEmployment law for employersWhy employers require a drug and alcohol policy

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

3–4 minutes

In Australia, alcohol use is a daily part of many people’s lives.  Although the use of illicit (illegal) drugs is not as common, the effects of both drug and alcohol use during and outside of work hours can have a significant negative impact on workplace health, safety and productivity.

Workers who are impaired by drugs or alcohol present a substantial safety risk to themselves and others as it may affect their ability to exercise judgment, coordination, motor control, concentration and alertness may be impaired, leading to increased risk of injury or accidents to themselves or others and damage to plant or equipment.

To illustrate this point, the Australian Drug Foundation estimates alcohol in the workplace costs businesses approximately $6 billion annually through lost productivity, absenteeism, injuries and workplace deaths.

Drugs and alcohol in the workplace can cause a range of significant problems for employers who have a general ‘duty of care’ obligation under health and safety laws to ensure that, as far as practicable, workers are not exposed to hazards and risks.

As such, an employer may be held liable for any negligent or wrongful acts committed by a drug- or alcohol-impaired worker unless the employer takes all reasonably practicable steps to prevent the behaviour.

For these reasons it is important for employers to implement a drug and alcohol policy for the workplace.

How to draft and implement a drug and alcohol policy

We recommend any employer considering drafting a drug and alcohol in the workplace policy follow these guidelines:

  • develop the policy in consultation with all stakeholders in the workplace such as unions, workers, and health and safety representatives;
    apply the policy equally to all workers across all levels of the business;
  • clearly state what is acceptable behaviour and the consequences of any unacceptable behaviour;
  • if the policy includes testing, describe the testing protocols and procedures; and
  • ensure the policy is clearly communicated to all members of the workforce.

Is testing justified?

Subjecting workers to drug and alcohol testing may be considered to be an unreasonable invasion of their privacy.  Before any decision to conduct testing is made as part of the policy, it is recommended the employer consult with the workers about the safety reasons why testing is important and the proposed testing procedure.

A decision to conduct testing should be based on the effect impairment could have on health and safety in the workplace.  For example, testing would be far more appropriate on a mine site or in a factory where heavy machinery is operated than an office as the impairment from alcohol or drugs is likely to have far more significant consequences.

Even where testing is considered to be necessary, employers must get a worker’s consent before implementing testing.

It is important to note that forcing an employee to be tested may expose an employer to criminal and civil liability.

Once testing has been conducted, it is imperative that the test results are stored securely and that workers’ privacy is protected.

Links and further references

Legislation

Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Qld)

Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)

Cases

Introducing drug and alcohol testing:

Endeavour Energy v Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia and others [2012] FWA 1809

Shell Refining (Australia) Pty Ltd, Clyde Refinery v Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union [2008] AIRC 510

Drug and alcohol testing policy:

Briggs v AWH Pty Ltd [2013] FWCFB 3316

Caltex Australia Limited v Australian Institute of Marine and Power Engineers; The Australian Workers Union [2009] FWA 424

Breaching the company drug and alcohol policy:

Daley v GWA Group Ltd T/A Dux Hot Water [2011] FWA 6993

Murphy v Patrick Stevedores [2011] FWA 6458

Further information

Developing a drug and alcohol policy is a very sensitive issue as it covers two competing workplace interests: private behaviour by an employee versus taking all available measures to ensure a safe working environment.  If you are an employer and require assistance to develop a policy, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights about employment law for employers

  • Know-how vs confidential information

    Know-how vs confidential information

    Understand the difference between “know-how” and confidential information when it comes to employer-employee relationships. Find out how to protect confidential trade secrets and use broad contractual terms to ensure protection. Click through to get the full details.

    Read more …

  • The doctrine of repudiation – when deals go bad

    The doctrine of repudiation – when deals go bad

    Contracting in business can be tricky, but the doctrine of repudiation may provide a way to end a contract and seek compensation. Learn more about this complex topic.

    Read more …

  • Bullying in the workplace by a body corporate

    Bullying in the workplace by a body corporate

    This investigation reveals the legal implications of workplace bullying in a body corporate. Find out what the Obligations of Reasonableness and the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) mean for workers and how to apply for an order to stop the bullying.

    Read more …

  • What’s an unfair preference claim?

    What’s an unfair preference claim?

    Understand the implications of unsecured debts, insolvent transactions, and unfair preference claims in the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Discover the defences available to protect against unfair preference claims and other related legal matters.

    Read more …

  • Contracting with Minors – is it even possible?

    Contracting with Minors – is it even possible?

    In the innovation economy it is becoming more prevalent for individuals aged less than eighteen (18) years (Minors) to seek to build enterprises.  From time to time we are asked to consider whether a client can contract with a Minor. The law in Australia[1] and Queensland[2] states that a Minor is someone who has yet…

    Read more …

  • Changes affecting unfair dismissal and minimum wage

    Changes affecting unfair dismissal and minimum wage

    Employers should be aware of three changes to employment law that came into effect on 1 July 2016, which have a significant impact on employee rights, including the unfair dismissal high income threshold, maximum compensation for claims, and minimum wage.

    Read more …

  • Terminating a contract with no set end date

    Terminating a contract with no set end date

    In practice, we come across commercial agreements of varying types (Contracts) that, for whatever reason, don’t provide for a term or an end date (Expiry Date).   There may have been reasons for this at the time that can no longer be recalled.   It raises a number of issues, particularly where the subject matter of the…

    Read more …

  • Letting go of employees threatening to go to the media

    Letting go of employees threatening to go to the media

    When employees leak confidential information or threaten to go to the media, employers can face serious consequences. Find out what the Fair Work Commission says about this issue and what options employers have to protect themselves.

    Read more …

  • Can employers dismiss employees for failing to follow instructions?

    Can employers dismiss employees for failing to follow instructions?

    When an employee fails to follow their employer’s instructions, the consequences can be serious. Learn about the steps employers must take before termination, and how to protect against unfair dismissal claims.

    Read more …

Send this to a friend