Privacy Law

Swiss company hands over user data

HomePrivate: BlogLegal insightsSwiss company hands over user data

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

3–4 minutes

Protonmail, an end-to-end encrypted secure email provider based in Switzerland, was recently obligated by a Swiss Court order to provide a certain class of user’s IP addresses to French police via the transnational Europol law enforcement agency.  This article considers the Australian statutory perspective on obtaining access to ‘encrypted’ data where such information may be contained within end-to-end encrypted communications.

Legislative foundation for accessing encrypted information

It may be the case that similar, encrypted email or instant message platforms in Australia may be susceptible to Court orders much like Protonmail.  Recently, Dundas Lawyers published an article on the Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Bill 2021 (Bill) which is linked here.  That article highlighted how the Bill could be used to access various types of personal information, including data contained in encrypted messages and emails.  Therefore, in Australia there exists avenues through which the government, through the Australian Federal Police or the Australian Crime Commission (as discussed in our earlier article on the passing of the Surveillance Legislation), can access and obtain control of encrypted personal or business communications.  The parallels between Australian law and the circumstance involving Protonmail are clear.

Notwithstanding the newly enacted Bill, there exists a slightly older amendment to statutes providing for governmental intervention in personal or business communications.  The Telecommunications and Other Legislation Amendment (Assistance and Access) Bill 2018  provides for this possibility by amending the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth) (Act), among other acts.  The Act generally operates in relation to the providers of telecommunication services and may obligate such providers to provide information to government agencies.

The primary function of the amendments was to provide law enforcement and intelligence agencies with the power to make ‘technical assistance requests’,[1] ‘technical assistance notices’[2] and ‘technical capability notices’.[3]  In providing this authority, the Act acknowledges that various enforcement agencies were hampered in their ability to carry out their expected functions as a result of their limited technical capacity to do so.  Often, targets of investigations were capable of usurping scrutiny because their communications were encrypted end-to-end.

It’s worth noting that a broad prohibition against the dissemination of any information retrieved subject to, amongst other things, a technical assistance notice, a technical capability notice or a technical assistance request.[4]  That encrypted information can be accessed by the government appears inevitable in certain circumstances, but it does not necessarily follow that the information accessed will enter the public domain.  The legislation takes appropriate steps to safeguard against this possibility.

Takeaways

It appears that the situation in Switzerland with Protonmail is entirely replicable under Australian statute.  Whilst only two (2) avenues have been identified in this article as to how such governmental access could be facilitated, there may be further avenues open to government bodies allowing them access to personal or professional end-to-end encrypted information.  Thus, Australian businesses need to be aware that legislation has adapted to overcome the barrier presented by end-to-end encryption.  Reasonable checks and balances are in place the ensure that a requirement to provide such information is not unjust, but this does not derogate from the reality that encryption is no longer a safe haven for private, electronically communicated messages.  It follows then, that persons and corporations may, in certain circumstances, consider using non-electronic communication means in respect ultra-sensitive information.

Links and further references

Legislation

Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Bill 2021

Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth)

Telecommunications and Other Legislation Amendment (Assistance and Access) Bill 2018

Further information about accessing encrypted data

If you are a business and need advice on accessing encrypted data, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:

[1] Act s 317G.

[2] Act s 317L.

[3] Act s 317T.

[4] Act s 317ZF.


Related insights about accessing encrypted data

  • What is a trade secret – Australian law?

    What is a trade secret – Australian law?

    Trade secrets are essential for business success. Learn about their characteristics, how to protect them, and what is not a trade secret. Get the key takeaways for businesses to maintain a competitive advantage.

    Read more …

  • What are Software Development Agreements?

    What are Software Development Agreements?

    Having a Software Development Agreement (SDA) is essential for any successful software development project. Learn more about the key clauses involved and how to avoid potential issues.

    Read more …

  • Enforcing confidentiality agreement terms

    Enforcing confidentiality agreement terms

    Learn how to protect confidential information and the legal remedies available if a breach occurs. Find out what elements must be established for a successful claim.

    Read more …

  • What exactly is a “Confidentiality Agreement”?

    What exactly is a “Confidentiality Agreement”?

    This article explores the importance of Confidentiality Agreements (NDAs) and what must be established in order to protect confidential information. Learn what elements and expectations are typically found in such agreements.

    Read more …

  • Meeting the evidentiary burden for a search order

    Meeting the evidentiary burden for a search order

    An Anton Piller Order is usually made without the presence of the respondent (ex parte) and consequently the Courts require the satisfaction of a high evidential threshold before granting orders of this nature.  As stated in George Rofail v Landmark Recruitment Pty Ltd and Others [2004] NSWIRComm 260 (7 September 2004), they are usually made…

    Read more …

  • Is your confidential information truly protected?

    Is your confidential information truly protected?

    This article examines the complex nuances around protecting confidential information, essential for commercial transactions. It looks at the quality of confidence, circumstances implying an obligation of confidence, and various Court cases to determine the confidentiality of information.

    Read more …

  • Legal risks in the in-app purchase model

    Legal risks in the in-app purchase model

    Software developers and publishers are offering users the chance to make In-App Purchases within their software, but there are legal risks involved. Learn how to protect yourself and your business by understanding the requirements of distribution platforms and Australian consumer law.

    Read more …

  • The risks of ‘manufactured’ business testimonials: lessons from the ACCC

    The risks of ‘manufactured’ business testimonials: lessons from the ACCC

    The Federal Court has imposed hefty fines and corrective measures on A Whistle and Co Pty Ltd, a franchisor found guilty of breaching the Australian Consumer Law by publishing fake customer testimonials. This serves as a warning to businesses to engage in genuine and legitimate marketing activities, not deceptive practices.

    Read more …

  • App developers – take care with Apple Developer License

    App developers – take care with Apple Developer License

    Creating apps for Apple devices requires adherence to Apple’s Developer Agreement, Program Licence Agreement, and App Store Review Guidelines. Learn about your rights and obligations when it comes to agreeing to Apple’s terms and conditions, and the consequences of ignoring them.

    Read more …

Send this to a friend