misleading and deceptive

Changes to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Limited [2014] FCA 634

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawChanges to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Limited [2014] FCA 634

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

2–3 minutes

Update to our article published on 23 July 2014

See further update published 14 April 2015

On 29 September 2014, Chief Justice Allsop of the Federal Court handed down his judgment in the Coles “Fresh Bread” case.

This decision highlights the potential perils of “pushing the boundaries” when it comes to advertising products for sale in a way that could be construed as misleading or deceptive within the meaning of section 18 of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) which is contained within Schedule 2 the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth).

Coles has been restrained for a period of 3 years from making any representations on any packaging that its bread was made or baked on the same day it was sold or baked from fresh dough when that is not the case.

Coles has also been ordered to display a corrective notice in a prominent location on counters in Coles Bakery Stores and through a prominent “one-click link” displayed in the top one-third of its homepage.

The Court made various declarations including that in marketing various bread products as “Freshly Baked In-Store” and “Baked Today, Sold Today”, Coles:

  • engaged in conduct in trade or commerce that was misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive, in contravention of section 18 of the ACL
  • made a representation in trade or commerce, in connection with the supply or possible supply or promotion of the supply of goods that was false or misleading as to the history of the goods in contravention of section 29(1)(a) of the ACL; and
  • engaged in conduct in trade or commerce that was liable to mislead the public as to the nature, the manufacturing process, and the characteristics of goods in contravention of section 33 of the ACL.

A copy of his Honour’s reasons for judgment and a copy of the corrective notice can be viewed here: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Limited (No 2) [2014] FCA 1022.

Further information

If you need further information about the potential of making misleading and deceptive statements in advertising, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights on competition and commercial law

  • ACCC guide for platform operators updated

    ACCC guide for platform operators updated

    The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has released a Guide to help Platform Operators in the Sharing Economy understand their legal obligations. Learn more about the four key principles, terms and conditions, policies and pricing obligations.

    Read more …

  • “Approved by ASIC” – a $20,000 issue

    “Approved by ASIC” – a $20,000 issue

    The Australian Securities and Investments Commission has taken action against Huntley Management Limited for advertising their products in a way that could mislead consumers. Learn more about this case and what it means for Australian Financial Services Licence holders.

    Read more …

  • Transfer duty implications for loans

    Transfer duty implications for loans

    Transfer Duty in Queensland: does it apply to loans? This article explores the Duties Act 2001 (Qld) and what constitutes a dutiable transaction and dutiable property. Find out if transfer duty applies to loans and learn more about the implications of loan agreements.

    Read more …

  • Transfer duty and issuing units in a unit trust

    Transfer duty and issuing units in a unit trust

    Discover how Queensland transfer duty is applied to dutiable transactions and what it means for your trust. Click through to the article for a comprehensive guide to the Duties Act 2001 (Qld).

    Read more …

  • What exactly is a Franchise Agreement?

    What exactly is a Franchise Agreement?

    Franchising agreements are legally binding relationships between franchisors and franchisees. But what makes them different from other agreements? Learn more about the key clauses of the code of conduct that must be observed in order to ensure a successful franchising agreement.

    Read more …

  • Enforcing confidentiality agreement terms

    Enforcing confidentiality agreement terms

    Learn how to protect confidential information and the legal remedies available if a breach occurs. Find out what elements must be established for a successful claim.

    Read more …

  • Distribution agreements – an introduction

    Distribution agreements – an introduction

    This article provides an overview of Distribution Agreements, including common clauses, potential risks, and how Dundas Lawyers can assist. Learn how to protect each party’s interests and ensure a successful agreement.

    Read more …

  • Priority issues and the PPS Register

    Priority issues and the PPS Register

    This article takes a closer look at the PPSA and how it affects secured creditors, exploring the Default Priority Rules, Attachment Times and priority time, as well as examples of situations where more specific priority rules apply.

    Read more …

  • Vesting unperfected security interests on liquidation – register or perish!

    Vesting unperfected security interests on liquidation – register or perish!

    In White v Spiers Earthworks Pty Ltd [2014] WASC 139 (White v Spiers), it was held that a security interest granted by a company will vest with the Grantor on insolvency or bankruptcy, unless it is registered on the PPSR. Businesses must take steps to register security interests to avoid potential loss.

    Read more …


Posted

in

, ,
Send this to a friend